• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量指标:为欧洲癌症信息系统提供数据的癌症登记数据的完整性、有效性和及时性。

Quality indicators: completeness, validity and timeliness of cancer registry data contributing to the European Cancer Information System.

作者信息

Giusti Francesco, Martos Carmen, Negrão Carvalho Raquel, Van Eycken Liesbet, Visser Otto, Bettio Manola

机构信息

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.

Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 28;13:1219128. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1219128. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1219128
PMID:37576881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10421659/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Population-based Cancer Registries (PBCRs) are tasked with collecting high-quality data, important for monitoring cancer burden and its trends, planning and evaluating cancer control activities, clinical and epidemiological research and development of health policies. The main indicators to measure data quality are validity, completeness, comparability and timeliness. The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of PBCRs data collected in the first ENCR-JRC data call, dated 2015.

METHODS

All malignant tumours, except skin non-melanoma, and and uncertain behaviour of bladder were obtained from 130 European general PBCRs for patients older than 19 years. Proportion of cases with death certificate only (DCO%), proportion of cases with unknown primary site (PSU%), proportion of microscopically verified cases (MV%), mortality to incidence (M:I) ratio, proportion of cases with unspecified morphology (UM%) and the median of the difference between the registration date and the incidence date were computed by sex, age group, cancer site, period and PBCR.

RESULTS

A total of 28,776,562 cases from 130 PBCRs, operating in 30 European countries were included in the analysis. The quality of incidence data reported by PBCRs has been improving across the study period. Data quality is worse for the oldest age groups and for cancer sites with poor survival. No differences were found between males and females. High variability in data quality was detected across European PBCRs.

CONCLUSION

the results reported in this paper are to be interpreted as the baseline for monitoring PBCRs data quality indicators in Europe along time.

摘要

未标注

基于人群的癌症登记处(PBCRs)的任务是收集高质量数据,这对于监测癌症负担及其趋势、规划和评估癌症控制活动、临床和流行病学研究以及制定卫生政策至关重要。衡量数据质量的主要指标是有效性、完整性、可比性和及时性。本文的目的是评估在2015年第一次ENCR-JRC数据调用中收集的PBCRs数据的质量。

方法

从130个欧洲普通PBCRs获取了所有恶性肿瘤(皮肤非黑色素瘤除外)以及膀胱行为不确定的病例,这些病例来自19岁以上的患者。按性别、年龄组、癌症部位、时期和PBCR计算仅持有死亡证明的病例比例(DCO%)、原发部位未知的病例比例(PSU%)、显微镜检查确诊的病例比例(MV%)、死亡率与发病率之比(M:I)、形态未明确的病例比例(UM%)以及登记日期与发病日期之差的中位数。

结果

分析纳入了在30个欧洲国家运作的130个PBCRs的总共28,776,562例病例。在整个研究期间,PBCRs报告的发病数据质量一直在提高。年龄最大的年龄组以及生存率低的癌症部位的数据质量较差。未发现男性和女性之间存在差异。在欧洲PBCRs中检测到数据质量存在很大差异。

结论

本文报告的结果应被解释为长期监测欧洲PBCRs数据质量指标的基线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/2d5dcc08dca0/fonc-13-1219128-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/d3f2e5bd5a67/fonc-13-1219128-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/9684bf70b4e5/fonc-13-1219128-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/c337e5a2abd2/fonc-13-1219128-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/cd617fbde81c/fonc-13-1219128-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/f0c8187fa2f6/fonc-13-1219128-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/96bb40e6ce63/fonc-13-1219128-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/2d5dcc08dca0/fonc-13-1219128-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/d3f2e5bd5a67/fonc-13-1219128-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/9684bf70b4e5/fonc-13-1219128-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/c337e5a2abd2/fonc-13-1219128-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/cd617fbde81c/fonc-13-1219128-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/f0c8187fa2f6/fonc-13-1219128-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/96bb40e6ce63/fonc-13-1219128-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f9/10421659/2d5dcc08dca0/fonc-13-1219128-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality indicators: completeness, validity and timeliness of cancer registry data contributing to the European Cancer Information System.质量指标:为欧洲癌症信息系统提供数据的癌症登记数据的完整性、有效性和及时性。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 28;13:1219128. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1219128. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of Data Quality of Four New Population Based Cancer Registries (PBCRs) in Chandigarh and Punjab, North India- A Quality Control Study.评价印度北部昌迪加尔和旁遮普邦四个新的基于人群的癌症登记处(PBCR)的数据质量:一项质量控制研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 May 1;22(5):1421-1433. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.5.1421.
3
Data quality in Brazilian population-based cancer registries for gastrointestinal cancers.巴西基于人群的癌症登记处胃肠道癌症的数据质量。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12477-2.
4
Quality assessment of a rural population-based cancer registry (PBCR) at Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India for the years 2017-18.2017 - 18年印度马哈拉施特拉邦拉特纳吉里农村人群癌症登记处(PBCR)的质量评估。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Feb 21;18:1672. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1672. eCollection 2024.
5
Completeness of regional cancer registry data in Northwest Russia 2008-2017.2008-2017 年俄罗斯西北部地区癌症登记数据的完整性。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11492-z.
6
Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.《2012年意大利癌症数据报告:儿童和青少年癌症》
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1 Suppl 1):1-225.
7
The Joint Research Centre-European Network of Cancer Registries Quality Check Software (JRC-ENCR QCS).联合研究中心-欧洲癌症登记处网络质量检查软件(JRC-ENCR QCS)
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 26;13:1250195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1250195. eCollection 2023.
8
Indicators of Data Quality at the Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug in Switzerland.瑞士苏黎世和楚格癌症登记处的数据质量指标。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jun 13;2018:7656197. doi: 10.1155/2018/7656197. eCollection 2018.
9
Comparability and validity of cancer registry data in the northwest of Russia.俄罗斯西北部癌症登记数据的可比性和有效性。
Acta Oncol. 2021 Oct;60(10):1264-1271. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1967443. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
10
Data quality at the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.保加利亚国家癌症登记处的数据质量:可比性、完整性、有效性和及时性概述。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;39(3):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural language processing for local, regional, and distant breast cancer relapse identification in pathology reports.用于在病理报告中识别局部、区域和远处乳腺癌复发的自然语言处理技术。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07801-8.
2
Looking at randomized trials with the critical eyes of epidemiologists: the case of screening colonoscopy.以流行病学家的批判性眼光审视随机试验:结肠镜筛查的案例
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01269-y.
3
Changes in female cancer diagnostic billing rates over the COVID-19 period in the Ontario Health Insurance Plan.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of data quality at the Hungarian National Cancer Registry, 2000-2019.2000 - 2019年匈牙利国家癌症登记处的数据质量评估
Cancer Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;82:102306. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102306. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
2
Comparability and validity of cancer registry data in the northwest of Russia.俄罗斯西北部癌症登记数据的可比性和有效性。
Acta Oncol. 2021 Oct;60(10):1264-1271. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1967443. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
3
Indicators of Data Quality at the Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug in Switzerland.瑞士苏黎世和楚格癌症登记处的数据质量指标。
安大略省医疗保险计划中女性癌症诊断计费率在新冠疫情期间的变化。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 May 26;17:17588359251339919. doi: 10.1177/17588359251339919. eCollection 2025.
4
Trends and projections in cervical cancer incidence in northern Tunisia (1994-2040).突尼斯北部宫颈癌发病率的趋势及预测(1994 - 2040年)
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13626-x.
5
Completeness Evaluation of Adult-Population-Based Cancer Registries: A Systematic Review.基于成人人群的癌症登记处完整性评估:一项系统综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 27;17(7):1123. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071123.
6
Automated Identification of Breast Cancer Relapse in Computed Tomography Reports Using Natural Language Processing.使用自然语言处理技术在计算机断层扫描报告中自动识别乳腺癌复发情况
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Dec;8:e2400107. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00107. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
7
Delayed Cancer Registration and Estimation of Screening Colonoscopy Effects.癌症登记延迟与结肠镜筛查效果评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2435669. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35669.
8
Facing further challenges in cancer data quality and harmonisation.癌症数据质量与整合面临进一步挑战。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 25;14:1438805. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1438805. eCollection 2024.
9
Geographical and temporal differences in gastric and oesophageal cancer registration by subsite and morphology in Europe.欧洲胃癌和食管癌按亚部位及形态学进行登记的地理和时间差异
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 20;14:1250107. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1250107. eCollection 2024.
10
Utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer: A scoping narrative literature review with a focus on the introduction of evidence-based therapeutic approaches in Europe.肺癌放疗的应用:一项范围界定性叙述性文献综述,重点关注欧洲循证治疗方法的引入。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023 Dec 18;45:100717. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100717. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jun 13;2018:7656197. doi: 10.1155/2018/7656197. eCollection 2018.
4
Evaluation of data quality at the National Cancer Registry of Ukraine.乌克兰国家癌症登记处的数据质量评估。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;53:156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
5
The history and use of cancer registry data by public health cancer control programs in the United States.美国公共卫生癌症控制项目对癌症登记数据的历史及应用情况。
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):4969-4976. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30905.
6
Evaluation of completeness of case ascertainment in Swiss cancer registration.瑞士癌症登记中病例确诊完整性的评估。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017 Sep;26 Joining forces for better cancer registration in Europe:S139-S146. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000380.
7
Quality measures of the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry indicate sound data quality for solid malignant tumours.基于人群的芬兰癌症登记处的质量指标表明实体恶性肿瘤的数据质量良好。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;77:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
8
Data quality in rare cancers registration: the report of the RARECARE data quality study.罕见癌症登记中的数据质量:RARECARE数据质量研究报告
Tumori. 2017 Jan 21;103(1):22-32. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000559. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
9
Data quality at the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.保加利亚国家癌症登记处的数据质量:可比性、完整性、有效性和及时性概述。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;39(3):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
10
Recent trends in cancer incidence: impact of risk factors, diagnostic activities and data quality of registration.癌症发病率的近期趋势:风险因素、诊断活动及登记数据质量的影响
Tumori. 2014 Jul-Aug;100(4):399-405. doi: 10.1700/1636.17894.