Institute for Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tecomarias Avenue, Botucatu, SP, 18607-440, Brazil.
Department of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Prof. Walter Maurício Correa St., SP, 18618-681, Botucatu, Brazil.
Braz J Microbiol. 2023 Sep;54(3):2173-2182. doi: 10.1007/s42770-023-01095-y. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
Salmonella is present in the poultry production chain and is a major challenge in terms of food safety and animal health. The early Salmonella detection is one of the main tools to control and prevent the transmission of this pathogen. Microbiological isolation and serotyping to identify and differentiate Salmonella serovars are laborious processes, time-consuming, and expensive. Therefore, molecular diagnostic methods can be rapid and efficient alternatives to the detection of this pathogen. Thus, the aim herein was to standardize and evaluate the use of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) in comparison with real-time PCR (qPCR) for detection of Salmonella associated with a multiplex qPCR for simultaneous identification and differentiation of S. Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium, S. Pullorum, and S. Gallinarum. The LAMP, qPCR, and multiplex qPCR assays were comparable in specificity. The three techniques were evaluated for specificity for 16 different serovars of Salmonella and for 37 strains of the serovars of interest. The limit of detection and the efficiency of the LAMP, qPCR, and multiplex qPCR reactions were determined. The techniques were applied to 33 samples of chicken carcasses and compared to the results of conventional microbiology for validation. As results, LAMP was specific in the detection of different Salmonella serovars but presented lower limit of detection ranging from 10 to 10 CFU/reaction. In comparison, qPCR could detect less cells (10 to 10 CFU/reaction), reaching equal specificity and better repeatability in the assays. The qPCR multiplexing for identification of the different serovars also showed good specificity, with the detection threshold between entre 10 and 10 CFU/reaction. The results obtained in the analyses on poultry carcasses suggested a correspondence between the results obtained in molecular methods and in conventional microbiology. Thus, the proposed assays are promising for the diagnosis of Salmonella in poultry carcasses, already proved to be faster and more efficient than conventional diagnostics techniques, being of great interest for poultry production, animal, and public health.
沙门氏菌存在于家禽生产链中,是食品安全和动物健康方面的主要挑战。早期沙门氏菌检测是控制和预防这种病原体传播的主要工具之一。微生物分离和血清分型以鉴定和区分沙门氏菌血清型是费力、耗时且昂贵的过程。因此,分子诊断方法可以快速有效地替代这种病原体的检测。因此,本研究旨在标准化和评估环介导等温扩增(LAMP)与实时 PCR(qPCR)的使用,以比较检测与多重 qPCR 同时鉴定和区分肠炎沙门氏菌、鼠伤寒沙门氏菌、鸡白痢沙门氏菌和鸡伤寒沙门氏菌的沙门氏菌。LAMP、qPCR 和多重 qPCR 检测在特异性方面具有可比性。三种技术均针对 16 种不同的沙门氏菌血清型和 37 株感兴趣的血清型进行了特异性评估。确定了 LAMP、qPCR 和多重 qPCR 反应的检测限和效率。将这些技术应用于 33 个鸡胴体样本,并与传统微生物学结果进行比较以验证。结果表明,LAMP 可特异性检测不同的沙门氏菌血清型,但检测限较低,范围为 10 至 10 CFU/反应。相比之下,qPCR 可以检测到更少的细胞(10 至 10 CFU/反应),在检测中具有相同的特异性和更好的重复性。用于不同血清型鉴定的 qPCR 多重检测也表现出良好的特异性,检测阈值在 10 至 10 CFU/反应之间。在对禽胴体的分析中获得的结果表明,分子方法和传统微生物学获得的结果之间存在对应关系。因此,所提出的检测方法有望用于禽胴体中的沙门氏菌诊断,已经被证明比传统诊断技术更快、更有效,对家禽生产、动物和公共卫生具有重要意义。