• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分阶段评估和优化非药物干预措施以控制美国的 COVID-19 大流行

Phase-wise evaluation and optimization of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S.

机构信息

Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

Senseable City Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;11:1198973. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1198973. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1198973
PMID:37601210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10434774/
Abstract

Given that the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and other therapies is greatly limited by the continuously emerging variants, non-pharmaceutical interventions have been adopted as primary control strategies in the global fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. However, implementing strict interventions over extended periods of time is inevitably hurting the economy. Many countries are faced with the dilemma of how to take appropriate policy actions for socio-economic recovery while curbing the further spread of COVID-19. With an aim to solve this multi-objective decision-making problem, we investigate the underlying temporal dynamics and associations between policies, mobility patterns, and virus transmission through vector autoregressive models and the Toda-Yamamoto Granger causality test. Our findings reveal the presence of temporal lagged effects and Granger causality relationships among various transmission and human mobility variables. We further assess the effectiveness of existing COVID-19 control measures and explore potential optimal strategies that strike a balance between public health and socio-economic recovery for individual states in the U.S. by employing the Pareto optimality and genetic algorithms. The results highlight the joint power of the state of emergency declaration, wearing face masks, and the closure of bars, and emphasize the necessity of pursuing tailor-made strategies for different states and phases of epidemiological transmission. Our framework enables policymakers to create more refined designs of COVID-19 strategies and can be extended to other countries regarding best practices in pandemic response.

摘要

鉴于 COVID-19 疫苗和其他疗法的有效性受到不断出现的变异株的极大限制,非药物干预措施已被作为全球抗击 COVID-19 大流行的主要控制策略。然而,长时间实施严格的干预措施不可避免地会对经济造成影响。许多国家都面临着如何在遏制 COVID-19 进一步传播的同时,采取适当的政策措施促进社会经济复苏的困境。为了解决这个多目标决策问题,我们通过向量自回归模型和 Toda-Yamamoto 格兰杰因果检验,研究了政策、流动性模式和病毒传播之间的潜在时变动态和关联。我们的研究结果揭示了各种传播和人类流动变量之间存在时间滞后效应和格兰杰因果关系。我们进一步评估了现有的 COVID-19 控制措施的有效性,并通过帕累托最优和遗传算法探索了美国各州在公共卫生和社会经济复苏之间取得平衡的潜在最优策略。结果突出了紧急状态声明、佩戴口罩和关闭酒吧的联合作用,并强调了针对不同州和不同流行病学传播阶段制定定制化策略的必要性。我们的框架使政策制定者能够制定更精细的 COVID-19 策略设计,并可以扩展到其他国家,以借鉴大流行应对方面的最佳实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894f/10434774/fb86eb1bc921/fpubh-11-1198973-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894f/10434774/5979a566a611/fpubh-11-1198973-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894f/10434774/f4ebd343f7c0/fpubh-11-1198973-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894f/10434774/f9595cff6778/fpubh-11-1198973-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894f/10434774/fb86eb1bc921/fpubh-11-1198973-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894f/10434774/5979a566a611/fpubh-11-1198973-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894f/10434774/f4ebd343f7c0/fpubh-11-1198973-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894f/10434774/f9595cff6778/fpubh-11-1198973-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/894f/10434774/fb86eb1bc921/fpubh-11-1198973-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Phase-wise evaluation and optimization of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S.分阶段评估和优化非药物干预措施以控制美国的 COVID-19 大流行
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;11:1198973. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1198973. eCollection 2023.
2
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
3
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.中断或减少呼吸道病毒传播的物理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 20;11(11):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5.
4
Trade-Off between COVID-19 Pandemic Prevention and Control and Economic Stimulus.新冠大流行防控与经济刺激之间的权衡。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13956. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113956.
5
A Retrospective Global Assessment of Factors Associated With COVID-19 Policies and Health Outcomes.回顾性评估与 COVID-19 政策和健康结果相关的因素。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 9;10:843445. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843445. eCollection 2022.
6
Mathematical assessment of the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on curtailing the 2019 novel Coronavirus.数学评估非药物干预措施对遏制 2019 年新型冠状病毒的影响。
Math Biosci. 2020 Jul;325:108364. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108364. Epub 2020 May 1.
7
Optimizing non-pharmaceutical intervention strategies against COVID-19 using artificial intelligence.利用人工智能优化针对 COVID-19 的非药物干预策略。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 13;11:1073581. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1073581. eCollection 2023.
8
COVID-19 prevention and control effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions-fuzzy-sets qualitative comparative analysis based on 69 countries in the world.基于全球 69 个国家的非药物干预 COVID-19 防控效果的模糊集定性比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 26;12:1419109. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1419109. eCollection 2024.
9
The Impact of COVID-19 Management Policies Tailored to Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: Policy Analysis.《基于 SARS-CoV-2 空气传播的新冠管理政策的影响:政策分析》。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 21;7(4):e20699. doi: 10.2196/20699.
10
Study Designs to Assess Real-World Interventions to Prevent COVID-19.评估预防 COVID-19 的真实世界干预措施的研究设计。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 27;9:657976. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.657976. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Insights into population behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic from cell phone mobility data and manifold learning.基于手机移动数据和流形学习对新冠疫情期间人群行为的洞察
Nat Comput Sci. 2021 Sep;1(9):588-597. doi: 10.1038/s43588-021-00125-9. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
The Effect of Preventive Measures and Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 on the Infection Risk, Treatment, and Hospitalization: A Cross-Sectional Study of Algeria.《预防措施和 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种对感染风险、治疗和住院的影响:阿尔及利亚的横断面研究》。
Viruses. 2022 Dec 12;14(12):2771. doi: 10.3390/v14122771.
3
A general framework for optimising cost-effectiveness of pandemic response under partial intervention measures.
一种优化部分干预措施下大流行应对成本效益的通用框架。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 14;12(1):19482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23668-x.
4
Simulating Transmission Scenarios of the Delta Variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Australia.模拟 SARS-CoV-2 德尔塔变异株在澳大利亚的传播情景。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;10:823043. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.823043. eCollection 2022.
5
Reopening California: Seeking robust, non-dominated COVID-19 exit strategies.加州重启:寻求稳健、非主导的新冠疫情退出策略。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 26;16(10):e0259166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259166. eCollection 2021.
6
Mobility restrictions were associated with reductions in COVID-19 incidence early in the pandemic: evidence from a real-time evaluation in 34 countries.在疫情早期,行动限制与 COVID-19 发病率的降低有关:来自 34 个国家实时评估的证据。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 2;11(1):13717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92766-z.
7
Early social distancing policies in Europe, changes in mobility & COVID-19 case trajectories: Insights from Spring 2020.欧洲早期的社交隔离政策、流动性变化与 COVID-19 病例轨迹:来自 2020 年春季的洞察。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 30;16(6):e0253071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253071. eCollection 2021.
8
Public mobility data enables COVID-19 forecasting and management at local and global scales.公共交通出行数据可助力于本地和全球范围内的 COVID-19 预测和管理。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 29;11(1):13531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92892-8.
9
The impact of government measures and human mobility trend on COVID-19 related deaths in the UK.政府措施和人员流动趋势对英国新冠相关死亡病例的影响。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100167. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100167. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
10
Factors Associated with the Implementation of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for Reducing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review.与实施非药物干预措施降低 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;18(8):4274. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084274.