Chen Anthony, Ju Chengsheng, Mackenzie Isla S, MacDonald Thomas M, Struthers Allan D, Wei Li, Man Kenneth K C
Research Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JP, England.
Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, England.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Aug 4;33:100715. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100715. eCollection 2023 Oct.
There is no real-world evidence regarding the association between beta-blocker use and mortality or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). We aimed to investigate the impact of beta-blocker use on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in patients with OSA.
We conducted a target trial emulation study of 37,581 patients with newly diagnosed OSA from 1st January 2000 to 30th November 2021 using the IMRD-UK database (formerly known as the THIN database). We compared the treatment strategies of initiating beta-blocker treatment within one year versus non-beta-blocker treatment through the method of clone-censor-weight. Covariates, including patients' demographics, lifestyle, comorbidities, and recent medications, were measured and controlled. Patients were followed up for all-cause mortality or composite CVD outcomes (angina, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation). We estimated the five-year absolute risks, risk differences and risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with standardised, weighted pooled logistic regression, which is a discrete-time hazard model for survival analysis. Several sensitivity analyses were performed, including multiple imputation addressing the missing data.
The median follow-up time was 4.1 (interquartile range, 1.9-7.8) years. The five-year absolute risk of all-cause mortality and CVD outcomes were 4.9% (95% CI, 3.8-6.0) and 13.0% (95% CI, 11.4-15.0) among beta-blocker users, and 4.0% (95% CI, 3.8-4.2) and 9.4% (95% CI, 9.1-9.7) among non-beta-blocker users, respectively. The five-year absolute risk difference and risk ratio between the two groups for all-cause mortality and CVD outcomes were 0.9% (95% CI, -0.2 to 2.1) and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.96-1.54), and 3.5% (95% CI, 2.1-5.5) and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.22-1.62), respectively. Findings were consistent across the sensitivity analyses.
Beta-blocker treatment was associated with an increased risk of CVD and a trend for an increased risk of mortality among patients with OSA. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Innovation and Technology Commission of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region Government.
关于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者使用β受体阻滞剂与死亡率或心血管结局之间的关联,尚无真实世界证据。我们旨在研究使用β受体阻滞剂对OSA患者全因死亡率和心血管疾病(CVD)的影响。
我们使用IMRD-UK数据库(原THIN数据库),对2000年1月1日至2021年11月30日期间新诊断为OSA的37581例患者进行了一项目标试验模拟研究。我们通过克隆审查加权法比较了在一年内开始使用β受体阻滞剂治疗与不使用β受体阻滞剂治疗的策略。测量并控制了包括患者人口统计学、生活方式、合并症和近期用药在内的协变量。对患者进行全因死亡率或复合CVD结局(心绞痛、心肌梗死、中风/短暂性脑缺血发作、心力衰竭或心房颤动)的随访。我们使用标准化加权汇总逻辑回归估计了五年绝对风险、风险差异和风险比以及95%置信区间(CI),这是一种用于生存分析的离散时间风险模型。进行了多项敏感性分析,包括处理缺失数据的多重插补法。
中位随访时间为4.1(四分位间距,1.9 - 7.8)年。使用β受体阻滞剂的患者中全因死亡率和CVD结局的五年绝对风险分别为4.9%(95%CI,3.8 - 6.0)和13.0%(95%CI,11.4 - 15.0);未使用β受体阻滞剂的患者中分别为4.0%(95%CI,3.8 - 4.2)和9.4%(95%CI,9.1 - 9.7)。两组之间全因死亡率和CVD结局的五年绝对风险差异和风险比分别为0.9%(95%CI,-0.2至2.1)和1.22(95%CI,0.96 - 1.54),以及3.5%(95%CI,2.1 - 5.5)和1.37(95%CI,1.22 - 1.62)。敏感性分析结果一致。
β受体阻滞剂治疗与OSA患者CVD风险增加以及死亡率增加趋势相关。需要进一步研究来证实我们的发现。
香港特别行政区政府创新及科技局