• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[老年群体中技术的使用:60岁以上个体的接受度、能力、掌控感、兴趣与社会指标之间的关联]

[Use of technology in old age: associations between acceptance, competence, control, interest and social indicators in individuals over 60 years old].

作者信息

Ferizaj Drin, Perotti Luis, Dahms Rebecca, Heimann-Steinert Anika

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics and Medical Gerontology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 May;57(3):227-234. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02225-9. Epub 2023 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00391-023-02225-9
PMID:37668693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11078788/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In addition to sociodemographic factors, action-theoretical constructs, such as technology acceptance and competence play an important role in technology use.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the associations between technology use, sociodemographic factors, action-theoretical constructs, and technology interest.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were collected from 585 study participants aged over 60 years from 14 surveys conducted between 2014 and 2020. A structural equation model was used to explain the relationships.

RESULTS

The structural equation model with covariates of survey year, age, gender, and education (n = 585) yielded the following fit indices: comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.918, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.894, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.056 [95 % confidence interval: 0.050-0.063], Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.079, χ2 = 3051.936 (p < 0.001), χ2/degrees of freedom (df) = 18.499. The strongest associations with technology use were found for technology acceptance and competence. Additionally, technology competence showed a significant association with technology interest. Gender and technology interest were not related to technology use but it was observed that men had higher levels of technology acceptance, control, competence, and interest.

DISCUSSION

Taking technology competence beliefs into account plays a crucial role in understanding the technology usage and interest of older individuals. Additionally, gender-specific differences in the theoretical constructs of action and interest in technology have been revealed in the context of the digital divide.

摘要

背景

除社会人口统计学因素外,行动理论结构,如技术接受度和能力,在技术使用中起着重要作用。

目的

本研究旨在探讨技术使用、社会人口统计学因素、行动理论结构和技术兴趣之间的关联。

材料与方法

数据来自2014年至2020年间进行的14项调查中的585名60岁以上的研究参与者。使用结构方程模型来解释这些关系。

结果

纳入调查年份、年龄、性别和教育程度作为协变量的结构方程模型(n = 585)得出以下拟合指数:比较拟合指数(CFI)= 0.918,塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)= 0.894,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)= 0.056 [95%置信区间:0.050 - 0.063],标准化均方根残差(SRMR)= 0.079,χ2 = 3051.936(p < 0.001),χ2/自由度(df)= 18.499。与技术使用关联最强的是技术接受度和能力。此外,技术能力与技术兴趣显著相关。性别与技术兴趣与技术使用无关,但观察到男性在技术接受度控制、能力和兴趣方面水平更高。

讨论

考虑技术能力信念在理解老年人的技术使用和兴趣方面起着至关重要的作用。此外,在数字鸿沟背景下,揭示了行动理论结构和技术兴趣方面的性别差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e5/11078788/a31ad5f876b8/391_2023_2225_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e5/11078788/9dc13c71481b/391_2023_2225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e5/11078788/a31ad5f876b8/391_2023_2225_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e5/11078788/9dc13c71481b/391_2023_2225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e5/11078788/a31ad5f876b8/391_2023_2225_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Use of technology in old age: associations between acceptance, competence, control, interest and social indicators in individuals over 60 years old].[老年群体中技术的使用:60岁以上个体的接受度、能力、掌控感、兴趣与社会指标之间的关联]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 May;57(3):227-234. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02225-9. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
2
Electronic Health Literacy Across the Lifespan: Measurement Invariance Study.全生命周期的电子健康素养:测量不变性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 9;20(7):e10434. doi: 10.2196/10434.
3
What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire.如何解释移动医生评分应用程序的使用情况?基于网络问卷的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 11;16(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3122.
4
Exploring the Measurement Properties of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Among Baby Boomers: A Multinational Test of Measurement Invariance.探究婴儿潮一代电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)的测量属性:测量不变性的多国测试
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 27;19(2):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5998.
5
Theory development in health care informatics: Information and communication technology acceptance model (ICTAM) improves the explanatory and predictive power of technology acceptance models.医疗保健信息学中的理论发展:信息与通信技术接受模型(ICTAM)提高了技术接受模型的解释力和预测力。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:63-7.
6
Measuring Electronic Health Literacy: Development, Validation, and Test of Measurement Invariance of a Revised German Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.测量电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表修订版的德国版本的开发、验证和测量不变性测试。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e28252. doi: 10.2196/28252.
7
The Usage of Digital Health Technology Among Older Adults in Hong Kong and the Role of Technology Readiness and eHealth Literacy: Path Analysis.香港老年人对数字健康技术的使用情况以及技术准备度和电子健康素养的作用:路径分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 12;25:e41915. doi: 10.2196/41915.
8
Authentic Leadership Questionnaire applied to Brazilian nurses: evidence of validity.真实领导行为问卷在巴西护士中的应用:效度证据。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2022 Jul 15;30:e3607. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.5868.3607. eCollection 2022.
9
Acceptance of Technologies for Aging in Place: A Conceptual Model.接受技术以实现原地老龄化:一个概念模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 31;23(3):e22613. doi: 10.2196/22613.
10
Evaluating SEM Model Fit with Small Degrees of Freedom.用小自由度评估 SEM 模型拟合度。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Mar-May;57(2-3):179-207. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Contrasting Internet Adoption in Early and Advanced Old Age: Does Internet Self-Efficacy Matter?早期和高龄期互联网采纳的对比:互联网自我效能感是否重要?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Feb 3;77(2):312-320. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab096.
2
Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator.技术接受度、技术自我效能感以及对基于技术的自主学习的态度:以学习动机作为中介变量
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 27;11:564294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294. eCollection 2020.
3
Too Old for Computers? The Longitudinal Relationship Between Stereotype Threat and Computer Use by Older Adults.
年纪太大不适合学电脑?老年人的刻板印象威胁与电脑使用之间的纵向关系。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 2;11:568972. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568972. eCollection 2020.
4
Factors that affect health information technology adoption by seniors: A systematic review.影响老年人采纳健康信息技术的因素:系统综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):1827-1842. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13011. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Technology makes older adults feel older.科技让老年人感觉更老。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Aug;23(8):1025-1030. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1479834. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
6
Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM).香港华裔老年人对老年技术的接受度:一种老年技术接受模型(STAM)。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(5):635-52. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.895855. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
Older Adults Talk Technology: Technology Usage and Attitudes.老年人谈科技:科技使用与态度
Comput Human Behav. 2010 Nov 1;26(6):1710-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020.
8
Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE).预测技术使用情况的因素:来自老龄化与技术增强研究与教育中心(CREATE)的研究结果。
Psychol Aging. 2006 Jun;21(2):333-52. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.
9
Modeling computer interest in older adults: the role of age, education, computer knowledge, and computer anxiety.老年人对计算机的兴趣建模:年龄、教育程度、计算机知识和计算机焦虑的作用。
Hum Factors. 1999 Sep;41(3):345-55. doi: 10.1518/001872099779610996.