Tahir Hunaiza, Rashid Farzana, Ali Shaukat, Summer Muhammad, Abaidullah Rimsha
Department of Zoology, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Department of Zoology, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
J Fluoresc. 2024 Sep;34(5):2019-2033. doi: 10.1007/s10895-023-03367-0. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
Current study was aimed to determine the antibacterial, antioxidant and cytotoxic potential of Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiONPs) and Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs). Nanoparticles were characterized by UV-Vis spectrophotometry, particle size analyzer (PSA), fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by standard agar dilution method. Antibacterial potential of nanoparticles was analyzed by standard disc diffusion method against bacterial strains including Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumonia. Different concentrations of NPs (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4 mg/mL) were incorporated to evaluate the antimicrobial activity. Antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity of these NPs was analyzed by DPPH method and brine shrimp cytotoxicity assay, respectively. The MIC of TiONPs against E. coli, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae was 0.04, 0.08 and 0.07 mg/mL respectively while the MIC of ZnONPs against the above strains was 0.01, 0.015 and 0.01 mg/mL. The maximum zone of inhibition was observed for K. pneumoniae i.e., 20mm and 25mm against TiO and ZnO NPs respectively, at 1.4 mg/mL concentration of NPs. The susceptibility of NPs against bacterial strains was evaluated in the following order: K. pneumoniae > P. aeruginosa > E. coli. The antioxidant activity of nanoparticles increased by increasing the concentration of NPs while cytotoxic analysis exhibited non-toxic effect of ZnO NPs while TiO had toxic effects on 1.2 and 1.4 mg/mL concentrations. Results revealed that ZnO NPs have more antibacterial and negligible cytotoxic potential in contrast to TiO NPs.
当前研究旨在确定二氧化钛纳米颗粒(TiONPs)和氧化锌纳米颗粒(ZnONPs)的抗菌、抗氧化和细胞毒性潜力。通过紫外可见分光光度法、粒度分析仪(PSA)、傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和热重分析(TGA)对纳米颗粒进行表征。采用标准琼脂稀释法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。通过标准纸片扩散法分析纳米颗粒对包括大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯菌在内的细菌菌株的抗菌潜力。加入不同浓度的纳米颗粒(0.2、0.4、0.6、0.8、1.0、1.2和1.4mg/mL)以评估抗菌活性。分别通过DPPH法和卤虫细胞毒性试验分析这些纳米颗粒的抗氧化活性和细胞毒性。TiONPs对大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的MIC分别为0.04、0.08和0.07mg/mL,而ZnONPs对上述菌株的MIC分别为0.01、0.015和0.01mg/mL。在纳米颗粒浓度为1.4mg/mL时,观察到肺炎克雷伯菌对TiO和ZnO NPs的最大抑菌圈分别为20mm和25mm。纳米颗粒对细菌菌株的敏感性按以下顺序评估:肺炎克雷伯菌>铜绿假单胞菌>大肠杆菌。纳米颗粒的抗氧化活性随纳米颗粒浓度的增加而增加,而细胞毒性分析显示ZnO NPs无毒性作用,而TiO在1.2和1.4mg/mL浓度时有毒性作用。结果表明,与TiONPs相比,ZnO NPs具有更强的抗菌能力和可忽略不计的细胞毒性潜力。