• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单标签机器学习分类揭示了五种精神障碍疾病的一些隐藏但相互关联的病因。

Single-label machine learning classification revealed some hidden but inter-related causes of five psychotic disorder diseases.

作者信息

Okagbue Hilary I, Ijezie Ogochukwu A, Ugwoke Paulinus O, Adeyemi-Kayode Temitope M, Jonathan Oluranti

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria.

Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Aug 23;9(9):e19422. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19422. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19422
PMID:37674848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10477489/
Abstract

Psychotic disorder diseases (PDD) or mental illnesses are group of illnesses that affect the minds and impair the cognitive ability, retard emotional ability and obstruct the process of communication and relationship with others and are characterized by delusions, hallucinations and disoriented or disordered pattern of thinking. Prognosis of PDD is not sufficient because of the nature of the diseases and as such adequate form of diagnosis is required to detect, manage and treat the illness. This paper applied the single-label classification (SLC) machine learning approach in mining of electronic health records of people with PDD in Nigeria using eleven independent (demographic) variables and five PDD as target variables. The five PDDs are Insomnia, Schizophrenia, Minimal Brain dysfunction (MBD), which is also known as Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Vascular Dementia (VD) and Bipolar Disorder (BD). The aim of using SLC is that it would be easier to detect some PDDs that are related to each other without the loss of information, which is a plus over multi-label classification (MLC). ReliefF algorithm was used at each experiment to precipitate the order of importance of the independent variables and redundant variables were excluded from the analysis. The order of the variables in feature selection was matched with feature importance after the classifications and quantified using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The data was divided into: 70% for training and 30% for testing. Four new performance metrics adapted from the root mean square (RMSE) were proposed and used to measure the differences between the performance results of the 10 Machine learning models in terms of the training and testing and secondly, feature and without feature selection. The new metrics are close to zero which is an indication that the use of feature selection and cross validation may not greatly affects the accuracy of the SLC. When the PDDs are included as predictors for classifying others, there was a tremendous improvement as revealed by the four new metrics for classification accuracy (CA), precision and recall. Analysis of variance showed the four different metrics differs significantly for classification accuracy (CA) and precision. However, there were no significant difference between the CA and precision when the duo are compared together across the four evaluation metrics at p value less than 0.05.

摘要

精神障碍疾病(PDD)或精神疾病是一组影响心智、损害认知能力、阻碍情感能力发展并妨碍与他人沟通及关系建立的疾病,其特征为妄想、幻觉以及思维紊乱或无序。由于这些疾病的性质,PDD的预后并不理想,因此需要适当的诊断形式来检测、管理和治疗该疾病。本文将单标签分类(SLC)机器学习方法应用于尼日利亚PDD患者电子健康记录的挖掘,使用了11个独立(人口统计学)变量和5种PDD作为目标变量。这5种PDD分别是失眠症、精神分裂症、轻度脑功能障碍(MBD)(也称为注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD))、血管性痴呆(VD)和双相情感障碍(BD)。使用SLC的目的是,在不损失信息的情况下,更容易检测出一些相互关联的PDD,这比多标签分类(MLC)更具优势。在每个实验中使用ReliefF算法来确定自变量的重要性顺序,并将冗余变量排除在分析之外。特征选择中变量的顺序与分类后的特征重要性相匹配,并使用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数进行量化。数据分为:70%用于训练,30%用于测试。提出了四个从均方根(RMSE)改编而来的新性能指标,用于衡量10种机器学习模型在训练和测试方面以及有无特征选择情况下的性能结果差异。新指标接近零,这表明使用特征选择和交叉验证可能不会对SLC的准确性产生太大影响。当将PDD作为预测因子用于对其他疾病进行分类时,四个新的分类准确率(CA)、精确率和召回率指标显示出了巨大的改进。方差分析表明,这四个不同指标在分类准确率(CA)和精确率方面存在显著差异。然而,当在p值小于0.05的四个评估指标中对二者进行比较时,CA和精确率之间没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217a/10477489/620eb84f8939/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217a/10477489/a4f2144dc440/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217a/10477489/620eb84f8939/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217a/10477489/a4f2144dc440/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/217a/10477489/620eb84f8939/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-label machine learning classification revealed some hidden but inter-related causes of five psychotic disorder diseases.单标签机器学习分类揭示了五种精神障碍疾病的一些隐藏但相互关联的病因。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 23;9(9):e19422. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19422. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
4
Multi-class classification model for psychiatric disorder discrimination.用于精神疾病鉴别的多类别分类模型。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104926. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104926. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
Quantitative exploration of factors influencing psychotic disorder ailments in Nigeria.尼日利亚影响精神障碍疾病因素的定量探索。
Data Brief. 2017 Jul 24;14:175-185. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.07.046. eCollection 2017 Oct.
6
Partial Classifier Chains with Feature Selection by Exploiting Label Correlation in Multi-Label Classification.利用多标签分类中的标签相关性进行特征选择的部分分类器链
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Oct 10;22(10):1143. doi: 10.3390/e22101143.
7
Multi-modal, Multi-measure, and Multi-class Discrimination of ADHD with Hierarchical Feature Extraction and Extreme Learning Machine Using Structural and Functional Brain MRI.利用结构和功能脑磁共振成像,通过分层特征提取和极限学习机对注意缺陷多动障碍进行多模态、多测量和多类别判别
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 4;11:157. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00157. eCollection 2017.
8
Predominant polarity classification and associated clinical variables in bipolar disorder: A machine learning approach.双相障碍中的主要极性分类及相关临床变量:一种机器学习方法。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:279-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.051. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
9
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
10
A new hybrid ensemble machine-learning model for severity risk assessment and post-COVID prediction system.一种新的混合集成机器学习模型,用于严重程度风险评估和 COVID 后预测系统。
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 Apr 13;19(6):6102-6123. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022285.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning for detecting Wilson's disease by amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation.基于低频波动幅度的机器学习用于检测威尔逊氏病
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 7;9(7):e18087. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18087. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Application of machine learning methods in predicting schizophrenia and bipolar disorders: A systematic review.机器学习方法在预测精神分裂症和双相情感障碍中的应用:一项系统综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 28;6(1):e962. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.962. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Effective hospital readmission prediction models using machine-learned features.
使用机器学习特征的有效医院再入院预测模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):1415. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08748-y.
4
The neurology revolution.神经学革命
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Nov;21(11):960-961. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00394-5. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
5
A multi-label classification system for anomaly classification in electrocardiogram.一种用于心电图异常分类的多标签分类系统。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2022 Aug 25;10(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s13755-022-00192-w. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Can we predict who will benefit from cognitive-behavioural therapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning studies.我们能否预测哪些人将从认知行为疗法中受益?一项基于机器学习研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Nov;97:102193. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102193. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
7
One-year incidence, predictors, and accuracy of prediction of suicidal thoughts and behaviors from the first to second year of university.大学生从第一年到第二年自杀意念和行为的发生率、预测因素及其预测准确性。
Depress Anxiety. 2022 Dec;39(12):727-740. doi: 10.1002/da.23278. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
8
A Machine-Learning-Algorithm-Based Prediction Model for Psychotic Symptoms in Patients with Depressive Disorder.一种基于机器学习算法的抑郁症患者精神病性症状预测模型。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 26;12(8):1218. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081218.
9
Machine learning for prediction of schizophrenia using genetic and demographic factors in the UK biobank.使用 UK Biobank 中的遗传和人口统计学因素进行精神分裂症预测的机器学习。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Aug;246:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
10
An overview of artificial intelligence techniques for diagnosis of Schizophrenia based on magnetic resonance imaging modalities: Methods, challenges, and future works.基于磁共振成像模式的精神分裂症诊断的人工智能技术概述:方法、挑战和未来工作。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Jul;146:105554. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105554. Epub 2022 May 10.