Suppr超能文献

在两家农村医院中,老年人因直接或经由急诊入院与 30 天内再入院率之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。

Association between hospital admission either directly or via the emergency department, and readmission rates at 30 days in older adults in two rural hospitals: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

General Medicine Department, Champagne Ardennes University, Reims, France.

University Committee of Resources for Research in Health (CURRS), University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2703-2710. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02543-3. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Older patients are frequently re-admitted to the hospital after attending the emergency department (ED). We investigated whether direct admission to the hospital was associated with a lower risk of readmission at 30 days compared to admission via the ED, in patients aged ≥ 75 years.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter cohort study from 01/01/2018 to 31/12/2019, including patients aged ≥ 75 years from two hospitals. Patients admitted directly were matched 1:1 with patients admitted via the ED for center, age category, sex, major diagnosis category, type of stay (medical/surgical), and severity. We compared readmission at 30 days (primary outcome) and length of stay (secondary outcome) between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1486 matched patients with an available outcome measure were included for analysis. We observed no significant difference in 30-day readmission rate between those admitted directly (102/778, 13.1%) and those admitted via the ED (87/708, 12.3%, p = 0.63). There was a significant difference in length of stay between both groups: median 5 days [Q1-Q3: 2-8] vs 6 days [2-11] for direct and ED admissions, respectively (effect size: 0.11, p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, only moderate to severe denutrition was associated with the risk of readmission at 30 days (Odds Ratio 2.133, 95% Confidence Interval 1.309-3.475).

CONCLUSION

The mode of entry to the hospital of patients aged 75 years and older was not associated with the risk of readmission at 30 days. However, those admitted directly had a significantly shorter length of stay than those admitted via the ED.

摘要

简介

老年患者在急诊科(ED)就诊后经常会再次住院。我们研究了≥75 岁的患者直接住院与通过 ED 住院相比,在 30 天内再入院的风险是否更低。

方法

这是一项回顾性多中心队列研究,时间为 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日,纳入了来自两家医院的≥75 岁患者。直接入院的患者与通过 ED 入院的患者进行 1:1 匹配,匹配因素包括中心、年龄类别、性别、主要诊断类别、住院类型(内科/外科)和严重程度。我们比较了两组患者在 30 天(主要结局)和住院时间(次要结局)方面的再入院情况。

结果

共有 1486 名符合可评估结局的匹配患者纳入分析。我们发现,直接入院组(778 例患者中有 102 例,13.1%)与通过 ED 入院组(708 例患者中有 87 例,12.3%,p=0.63)的 30 天再入院率无显著差异。两组患者的住院时间存在显著差异:直接入院组的中位数为 5 天[Q1-Q3:2-8],ED 入院组为 6 天[2-11](效应量:0.11,p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,仅中度至重度营养不良与 30 天再入院风险相关(优势比 2.133,95%置信区间 1.309-3.475)。

结论

≥75 岁患者进入医院的方式与 30 天内再入院的风险无关。然而,直接入院患者的住院时间明显短于通过 ED 入院的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验