General Medicine Department, Champagne Ardennes University, Reims, France.
University Committee of Resources for Research in Health (CURRS), University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2703-2710. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02543-3. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
Older patients are frequently re-admitted to the hospital after attending the emergency department (ED). We investigated whether direct admission to the hospital was associated with a lower risk of readmission at 30 days compared to admission via the ED, in patients aged ≥ 75 years.
Retrospective multicenter cohort study from 01/01/2018 to 31/12/2019, including patients aged ≥ 75 years from two hospitals. Patients admitted directly were matched 1:1 with patients admitted via the ED for center, age category, sex, major diagnosis category, type of stay (medical/surgical), and severity. We compared readmission at 30 days (primary outcome) and length of stay (secondary outcome) between groups.
A total of 1486 matched patients with an available outcome measure were included for analysis. We observed no significant difference in 30-day readmission rate between those admitted directly (102/778, 13.1%) and those admitted via the ED (87/708, 12.3%, p = 0.63). There was a significant difference in length of stay between both groups: median 5 days [Q1-Q3: 2-8] vs 6 days [2-11] for direct and ED admissions, respectively (effect size: 0.11, p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, only moderate to severe denutrition was associated with the risk of readmission at 30 days (Odds Ratio 2.133, 95% Confidence Interval 1.309-3.475).
The mode of entry to the hospital of patients aged 75 years and older was not associated with the risk of readmission at 30 days. However, those admitted directly had a significantly shorter length of stay than those admitted via the ED.
老年患者在急诊科(ED)就诊后经常会再次住院。我们研究了≥75 岁的患者直接住院与通过 ED 住院相比,在 30 天内再入院的风险是否更低。
这是一项回顾性多中心队列研究,时间为 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日,纳入了来自两家医院的≥75 岁患者。直接入院的患者与通过 ED 入院的患者进行 1:1 匹配,匹配因素包括中心、年龄类别、性别、主要诊断类别、住院类型(内科/外科)和严重程度。我们比较了两组患者在 30 天(主要结局)和住院时间(次要结局)方面的再入院情况。
共有 1486 名符合可评估结局的匹配患者纳入分析。我们发现,直接入院组(778 例患者中有 102 例,13.1%)与通过 ED 入院组(708 例患者中有 87 例,12.3%,p=0.63)的 30 天再入院率无显著差异。两组患者的住院时间存在显著差异:直接入院组的中位数为 5 天[Q1-Q3:2-8],ED 入院组为 6 天[2-11](效应量:0.11,p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,仅中度至重度营养不良与 30 天再入院风险相关(优势比 2.133,95%置信区间 1.309-3.475)。
≥75 岁患者进入医院的方式与 30 天内再入院的风险无关。然而,直接入院患者的住院时间明显短于通过 ED 入院的患者。