• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为雇主赞助的医疗计划测试试点项目的一部分,先发药物遗传学检测小组临床实施的经验教训。

Lessons from clinical implementation of a preemptive pharmacogenetic panel as part of a testing pilot program with an employer-sponsored medical plan.

作者信息

Norris Madeline, Dalton Rachel, Alam Benish, Eddy Elizabeth, Nguyen Khoa A, Cavallari Larisa H, Sumfest Jill, Wiisanen Kristin, Cicali Emily J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2023 Aug 23;14:1249003. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1249003. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2023.1249003
PMID:37680199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10482099/
Abstract

This manuscript reports on a pilot program focused on implementing pharmacogenetic testing within the framework of an employer-sponsored medical plan at University of Florida (UF) Health. The aim was to understand the challenges associated with program implementation and to gather insights into patient attitudes towards PGx testing. The pilot program adopted a partially preemptive approach, targeting patients on current prescriptions for medications with relevant gene-drug associations. Patients were contacted via phone or through the MyChart system and offered pharmacogenetic testing with no additional direct costs. Of 244 eligible patients, 110 agreed to participate. However, only 61 returned the mailed DNA collection kits. Among these, 89% had at least one potentially actionable genotype-based phenotype. Post-test follow-up revealed that while the majority viewed the process positively, 71% preferred a consultation with a pharmacogenetic specialist for better understanding of their results. Barriers to implementation ranged from fatigue with the healthcare system to a lack of understanding of the pharmacogenetic testing and concerns about privacy and potential misuse of genetic data. The findings underscore the need for clearer patient education on pharmacogenetic results and suggest the importance of the role of pharmacogenetic-trained pharmacists in delivering this education. They also highlight issues with relying on incomplete or inaccurate medication lists in patients' electronic health record. The implementation revealed less obvious challenges, the understanding of which could be beneficial for the success of future preemptive pharmacogenetic implementation programs. The insights from the pilot program served to bridge the information gap between patients, providers, and pharmacogenetic -specialists, with the ultimate goal of improving patient care.

摘要

本手稿报告了一项试点项目,该项目专注于在佛罗里达大学健康中心(UF Health)雇主赞助的医疗计划框架内实施药物遗传学检测。目的是了解与项目实施相关的挑战,并深入了解患者对药物基因组学检测的态度。试点项目采用了部分先发制的方法,针对正在使用具有相关基因-药物关联的药物进行当前处方治疗的患者。通过电话或MyChart系统联系患者,并提供药物遗传学检测,无需额外直接费用。在244名符合条件的患者中,110人同意参与。然而,只有61人退回了邮寄的DNA采集试剂盒。在这些人中,89%至少有一种基于基因型的潜在可采取行动的表型。检测后的随访显示,虽然大多数人对这个过程持积极态度,但71%的人希望与药物遗传学专家进行咨询,以便更好地理解他们的检测结果。实施的障碍包括对医疗系统的疲劳、对药物遗传学检测的缺乏了解以及对隐私和基因数据潜在滥用的担忧。研究结果强调了对患者进行更清晰的药物遗传学检测结果教育的必要性,并表明受过药物遗传学培训的药剂师在提供这种教育方面的重要作用。它们还突出了依赖患者电子健康记录中不完整或不准确的药物清单所存在的问题。该实施揭示了一些不太明显的挑战,了解这些挑战可能有助于未来先发制药物遗传学实施项目的成功。试点项目的见解有助于弥合患者、提供者和药物遗传学专家之间的信息差距,最终目标是改善患者护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/6161a09836d9/fgene-14-1249003-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/55f1e7cfd9cf/fgene-14-1249003-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/2b2d64152ce2/fgene-14-1249003-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/c6ceacf1b283/fgene-14-1249003-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/790b692be832/fgene-14-1249003-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/6161a09836d9/fgene-14-1249003-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/55f1e7cfd9cf/fgene-14-1249003-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/2b2d64152ce2/fgene-14-1249003-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/c6ceacf1b283/fgene-14-1249003-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/790b692be832/fgene-14-1249003-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b645/10482099/6161a09836d9/fgene-14-1249003-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Lessons from clinical implementation of a preemptive pharmacogenetic panel as part of a testing pilot program with an employer-sponsored medical plan.作为雇主赞助的医疗计划测试试点项目的一部分,先发药物遗传学检测小组临床实施的经验教训。
Front Genet. 2023 Aug 23;14:1249003. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1249003. eCollection 2023.
2
Preemptive pharmacogenetic testing to guide chemotherapy dosing in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: a qualitative study of barriers to implementation.预先的药物遗传学检测以指导胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者的化疗剂量:实施障碍的定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09171-6.
3
How to Transition from Single-Gene Pharmacogenetic Testing to Preemptive Panel-Based Testing: A Tutorial.如何从单基因药物遗传学检测过渡到预测性面板检测:教程。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;108(3):557-565. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1912. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
4
Challenges and lessons learned from clinical pharmacogenetic implementation of multiple gene-drug pairs across ambulatory care settings.从多个基因-药物组合在门诊环境中的临床药物遗传学实施中获得的挑战和经验教训。
Genet Med. 2019 Oct;21(10):2264-2274. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0500-7. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
5
Assessment of the Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Testing in a Pediatric Tertiary Care Setting.评估在儿科三级护理环境中实施药物基因组学检测的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110446. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10446.
6
Actionable pharmacogenetic variants in Hong Kong Chinese exome sequencing data and projected prescription impact in the Hong Kong population.香港华裔外显子组测序数据中的可操作药物遗传学变异体及对香港人群处方的预计影响。
PLoS Genet. 2021 Feb 18;17(2):e1009323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009323. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Evaluating the frequency and the impact of pharmacogenetic alleles in an ancestrally diverse Biobank population.评估一个具有多种族背景的生物库人群中药物遗传学等位基因的频率和影响。
J Transl Med. 2022 Nov 28;20(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03745-5.
8
The effect of medication reconciliation on generating an accurate medication list in a pharmacogenomics practice.用药核对在药物基因组学实践中生成准确用药清单的作用。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(23):1259. doi: 10.21037/atm-2022-63.
9
Preliminary outcomes of preemptive warfarin pharmacogenetic testing at a large rural healthcare center.大型农村医疗中心抢先进行华法林药物基因检测的初步结果。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Feb 21;76(6):387-397. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy072.
10
Assessing the Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Panel-Testing in Primary Care in the Netherlands Utilizing a Theoretical Framework.利用理论框架评估荷兰初级保健中药物基因组学面板检测的实施情况。
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 17;9(3):814. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030814.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation and integration of a multidisciplinary pharmacogenomics service in an underserved integrated behavioral health clinic.在一家服务欠缺的综合行为健康诊所实施和整合多学科药物基因组学服务。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 May 22;16:1594032. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1594032. eCollection 2025.
2
Barriers and facilitators for implementing a pharmacogenetic passport: lessons learned from reusing sequencing data.实施药物遗传学护照的障碍与促进因素:从重新利用测序数据中汲取的经验教训
Pharmacogenomics. 2025 Apr-Apr;26(5-6):143-156. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2025.2504862. Epub 2025 May 21.
3
Receptor Pharmacogenomics: Deciphering Genetic Influence on Drug Response.

本文引用的文献

1
Reimbursement of pharmacogenetic tests at a tertiary academic medical center in the United States.美国一家三级学术医疗中心的药物遗传学检测报销情况。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 14;14:1179364. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1179364. eCollection 2023.
2
Implementation of CYP2C19 genotyping to guide proton pump inhibitor use at an academic health center.在学术医疗中心实施 CYP2C19 基因分型以指导质子泵抑制剂的使用。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2023 Jul 21;80(15):994-1003. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxad099.
3
A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study.
受体药理学基因组学:解析遗传对药物反应的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 29;25(17):9371. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179371.
4
Strategies for DPYD testing prior to fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in the US.美国氟嘧啶类化疗前 DPYD 检测的策略。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jul 9;32(8):497. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08674-1.
一个 12 基因药物遗传学检测面板以预防药物不良反应:一项开放标签、多中心、对照、集群随机交叉实施研究。
Lancet. 2023 Feb 4;401(10374):347-356. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01841-4.
4
Real-World Impact of a Pharmacogenomics-Enriched Comprehensive Medication Management Program.一项富含药物基因组学的综合药物管理计划的真实世界影响
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 8;12(3):421. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030421.
5
Multisite investigation of strategies for the clinical implementation of pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing.多中心研究:抢先性药物遗传学检测的临床实施策略
Genet Med. 2021 Dec;23(12):2335-2341. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01269-9. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
6
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2C19 and Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing.临床药物基因组学实施联盟(CPIC)CYP2C19 和质子泵抑制剂剂量指南。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jun;109(6):1417-1423. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2015. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
7
How to Transition from Single-Gene Pharmacogenetic Testing to Preemptive Panel-Based Testing: A Tutorial.如何从单基因药物遗传学检测过渡到预测性面板检测:教程。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;108(3):557-565. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1912. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
Knowledge and attitudes on pharmacogenetics among pediatricians.儿科医生对药物遗传学的知识和态度。
J Hum Genet. 2020 May;65(5):437-444. doi: 10.1038/s10038-020-0723-0. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
9
Standardizing CYP2D6 Genotype to Phenotype Translation: Consensus Recommendations from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group.标准化 CYP2D6 基因型到表型的转化:临床药物基因组学实施联盟和荷兰药物基因组学工作组的共识建议。
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan;13(1):116-124. doi: 10.1111/cts.12692. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium: 10 Years Later.临床药物基因组学实施联盟:10 年后。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jan;107(1):171-175. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1651. Epub 2019 Nov 5.