Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Feb;38(1):71-81. doi: 10.1037/fam0001152. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
To disentangle the effects of key dimensions of dispositional mindfulness on parenting, the present study tests the hypotheses that parental Nonreactivity moderates the association between Observing and effective parenting behaviors, and that parental inhibitory control mediates the relationship between Observing and parenting depending on levels of Nonreactivity. The sample consists of 294 fathers (95.9% deployed) and 313 mothers (81.5% nondeployed) from 336 military families with a child aged between 4 and 13 years at baseline. Parents reported Observing and Nonreactivity at baseline using the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and completed a computerized Go/No-Go task for assessing inhibitory control at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Families completed a series of in-home interaction tasks at baseline and 2-year follow-up, and effective parenting behaviors were observed and coded using a theory-driven, empirically validated coding system. Results showed that when fathers reported low Nonreactivity, the association between Observing and effective parenting behaviors 2 years later was negative, but this association became positive when fathers reported high Nonreactivity. Fathers' Observing was associated with decreased inhibitory control 1 year later when they reported low (vs. high) Nonreactivity, whereas mothers' Observing was associated with increased inhibitory control 1 year later when they reported high (vs. low) Nonreactivity. The hypothesized effect of inhibitory control as a mediator was not found. Understanding specificity in the effects of dispositional mindfulness dimensions on parenting behaviors will drive effective and efficient designs of mindful parenting interventions. Future research should use dismantling experimental designs to test the synergistic effects of Observing and Nonreactivity in parents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
为了厘清特质正念的关键维度对养育行为的影响,本研究检验了以下假设:父母的非反应性调节了观察与有效养育行为之间的关系,而父母的抑制控制则根据非反应性水平调节了观察与养育之间的关系。样本包括 336 个军人家庭的 294 名父亲(95.9%部署)和 313 名母亲(81.5%非部署),其子女在基线时年龄在 4 至 13 岁之间。父母在基线时使用五因素正念问卷报告观察和非反应性,并在基线和 1 年随访时完成一项计算机化的 Go/No-Go 任务以评估抑制控制。家庭在基线和 2 年随访时完成了一系列家庭互动任务,并使用基于理论、经验验证的编码系统观察和编码有效养育行为。结果表明,当父亲报告低非反应性时,观察与 2 年后有效养育行为之间的关联为负,但当父亲报告高非反应性时,这种关联变为正。当父亲报告低(而非高)非反应性时,他们的观察与 1 年后抑制控制的下降有关,而当母亲报告高(而非低)非反应性时,他们的观察与 1 年后抑制控制的增加有关。作为中介的抑制控制的假设效应未被发现。理解特质正念维度对养育行为影响的特异性将推动有针对性和高效的正念养育干预设计。未来的研究应该使用分解实验设计来检验父母中观察和非反应性的协同效应。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。