Larie Baghal Seyyed Mohsen, Salem Katayoun, Saati Keivan
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Front Dent. 2023 Jul 8;20:23. doi: 10.18502/fid.v20i23.13167. eCollection 2023.
To compare the effectiveness of fluoride varnish and two calcium-based fluoride products on the remineralization of primary teeth enamel. Surface-microhardness (SMH) of 36 extracted anterior primary teeth was measured by Vickers test (50gr/5 seconds) to provide a baseline for later comparisons. All teeth were immersed in demineralizing solution for 96 hours to create caries-like lesions and SMH was determined for the artificially-induced caries. The teeth were randomly assigned to three groups consisting of 5% fluoride varnish once daily/10 seconds, Clinpro™ 5000 toothpaste once daily/2 minutes, and Remin Pro cream once daily/3 minutes for 28 days. All specimens were kept in artificial saliva with pH cycling during the study period. After remineralization, SMH was evaluated for the last time. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Mauchly's sphericity, and RM-ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for inter-and- intra-group comparisons at the three stages of the study. Neither the baseline SMH nor the SMH of the artificially created caries showed significant differences among the samples (P>0.05). The post-treatment SMH was highest in the Clinpro group (296.4±73.1kgf/mm), followed by Remin Pro (283.8±119.3kgf/mm), and varnish (270.9±78.3 kgf/mm). There was no significant difference among the groups after treatment (P>0.05). We also did not observe a significant difference among the three different study stages (P>0.05). Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, daily application of low fluoride-calcium compound seems to be as effective as the professional use of fluoride varnish or high-content fluoride toothpaste in remineralizing initial caries of primary teeth.
比较氟化物漆和两种钙基氟化物产品对乳牙牙釉质再矿化的效果。通过维氏试验(50克/5秒)测量36颗拔除的前乳牙的表面显微硬度(SMH),以提供后续比较的基线。将所有牙齿浸泡在脱矿溶液中96小时以形成类龋损,并测定人工诱导龋的SMH。将牙齿随机分为三组,分别为每天一次/10秒涂抹5%氟化物漆、每天一次/2分钟使用Clinpro™ 5000牙膏、每天一次/3分钟使用Remin Pro乳膏,持续28天。在研究期间,所有标本均保存在具有pH循环的人工唾液中。再矿化后,最后一次评估SMH。通过单因素方差分析、Mauchly球形检验和重复测量方差分析,并采用Bonferroni校正进行组间和组内比较,分析研究三个阶段的数据。样本之间的基线SMH和人工制造龋的SMH均无显著差异(P>0.05)。治疗后Clinpro组的SMH最高(296.4±73.1kgf/mm),其次是Remin Pro组(283.8±119.3kgf/mm)和氟化物漆组(270.9±78.3 kgf/mm)。治疗后各组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。我们在三个不同的研究阶段也未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。在本体外研究的局限性范围内,每日应用低氟钙化合物在乳牙初始龋再矿化方面似乎与专业使用氟化物漆或高含量氟牙膏一样有效。