• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿司匹林在心血管疾病和糖尿病患者中的剂量比较:ADAPTABLE 试验的亚组分析。

Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus: A Subgroup Analysis of the ADAPTABLE Trial.

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(1):81-88. doi: 10.2337/dc23-0749.

DOI:10.2337/dc23-0749
PMID:37713477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10733644/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) must be on the most effective dose of aspirin to mitigate risk of future adverse cardiovascular events.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

ADAPTABLE, an open-label, pragmatic study, randomized patients with stable, chronic ASCVD to 81 mg or 325 mg of daily aspirin. The effects of aspirin dosing was assessed on the primary effectiveness outcome, a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke, and the primary safety outcome of hospitalization for major bleeding. In this prespecified analysis, we used Cox proportional hazards models to compare aspirin dosing in patients with and without DM for the primary effectiveness and safety outcome.

RESULTS

Of 15,076 patients, 5,676 (39%) had DM of whom 2,820 (49.7%) were assigned to 81 mg aspirin and 2,856 (50.3%) to 325 mg aspirin. Patients with versus without DM had higher rates of the composite cardiovascular outcome (9.6% vs. 5.9%; P < 0.001) and bleeding events (0.78% vs. 0.50%; P < 0.001). When comparing 81 mg vs. 325 mg of aspirin, patients with DM had no difference in the primary effectiveness outcome (9.3% vs. 10.0%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.98 [95% CI 0.83-1.16]; P = 0.265) or safety outcome (0.87% vs. 0.69%; subdistribution HR 1.25 [95% CI 0.72-2.16]; P = 0.772).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the inherently higher risk of patients with DM irrespective of aspirin dosing. Our findings suggest that a higher dose of aspirin yields no added clinical benefit, even in a more vulnerable population.

摘要

目的

患有糖尿病(DM)和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的患者必须使用最有效的剂量的阿司匹林,以降低未来不良心血管事件的风险。

研究设计和方法

ADAPTABLE 是一项开放性、实用性研究,将稳定的慢性 ASCVD 患者随机分为每日 81 毫克或 325 毫克的阿司匹林。评估阿司匹林剂量对主要有效性结局(全因死亡、心肌梗死住院或中风住院的复合结局)和主要安全性结局(大出血住院)的影响。在这项预设分析中,我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较了有和无糖尿病患者的主要有效性和安全性结局的阿司匹林剂量。

结果

在 15076 名患者中,5676 名(39%)患有 DM,其中 2820 名(49.7%)被分配到 81 毫克阿司匹林组,2856 名(50.3%)被分配到 325 毫克阿司匹林组。有和无糖尿病的患者复合心血管结局的发生率更高(9.6%比 5.9%;P < 0.001)和出血事件发生率更高(0.78%比 0.50%;P < 0.001)。比较 81 毫克和 325 毫克的阿司匹林,有糖尿病的患者在主要有效性结局方面没有差异(9.3%比 10.0%;风险比[HR]0.98[95%可信区间 0.83-1.16];P = 0.265)或安全性结局(0.87%比 0.69%;亚分布 HR 1.25[95%可信区间 0.72-2.16];P = 0.772)。

结论

本研究证实了无论阿司匹林剂量如何,患有糖尿病的患者的风险都更高。我们的研究结果表明,更高剂量的阿司匹林并不能带来额外的临床获益,即使在更脆弱的人群中也是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a3/10733644/dfda90d9534a/dc230749f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a3/10733644/2dc1a398df65/dc230749F0GA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a3/10733644/03f4cef4b6b0/dc230749f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a3/10733644/dfda90d9534a/dc230749f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a3/10733644/2dc1a398df65/dc230749F0GA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a3/10733644/03f4cef4b6b0/dc230749f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9a3/10733644/dfda90d9534a/dc230749f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus: A Subgroup Analysis of the ADAPTABLE Trial.阿司匹林在心血管疾病和糖尿病患者中的剂量比较:ADAPTABLE 试验的亚组分析。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(1):81-88. doi: 10.2337/dc23-0749.
2
Aspirin Dosing for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Male and Female Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the ADAPTABLE Randomized Clinical Trial.阿司匹林在男性和女性动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病二级预防中的剂量:ADAPTABLE 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Sep 1;9(9):808-816. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.1712.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease.阿司匹林在心血管疾病中的剂量比较效果。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 27;384(21):1981-1990. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102137. Epub 2021 May 15.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Enteric-Coated vs Uncoated Aspirin in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the ADAPTABLE Randomized Clinical Trial.阿司匹林肠溶片与普通阿司匹林治疗心血管疾病患者的有效性和安全性:ADAPTABLE 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Nov 1;8(11):1061-1069. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.3364.
5
Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Elderly Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: Subanalysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial (JPPP-70).低剂量阿司匹林用于预防老年有动脉粥样硬化危险因素的日本患者心血管事件的初级预防:一项随机临床试验的亚组分析(JPPP-70)。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019 Jun;19(3):299-311. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0313-0.
6
Impact of aspirin dose according to race in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a secondary analysis of the ADAPTABLE randomised controlled trial.阿司匹林剂量对不同种族动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病二级预防的影响:ADAPTABLE随机对照试验的二次分析
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):e078197. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078197.
7
Ticagrelor in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease and Diabetes.替格瑞洛在稳定型冠心病合并糖尿病患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 3;381(14):1309-1320. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908077. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
8
Prophylactic Efficacy and Safety of Antithrombotic Regimens in Patients with Stable Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (S-ASCVD): A Bayesian Network Meta-Regression Analysis.稳定型动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(S-ASCVD)患者抗栓治疗方案的预防疗效和安全性:贝叶斯网络荟萃回归分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023 May;23(3):257-267. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00574-9. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
9
Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning in Association With the Net Benefit of Aspirin in Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.冠状动脉钙扫描在阿司匹林用于动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病一级预防的净获益评估中的价值。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):179-187. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4939.
10
Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in Japanese patients 60 years or older with atherosclerotic risk factors: a randomized clinical trial.低剂量阿司匹林用于预防 60 岁及以上有动脉粥样硬化危险因素的日本患者的心血管事件:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 17;312(23):2510-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15690.

本文引用的文献

1
6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.6. 血糖目标:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S97-S110. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S006.
2
Validation of Cardiovascular End Points Ascertainment Leveraging Multisource Electronic Health Records Harmonized Into a Common Data Model in the ADAPTABLE Randomized Clinical Trial.利用多源电子健康记录并将其整合成一个通用数据模型,对 ADAPTABLE 随机临床试验中的心血管终点进行验证。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Dec;14(12):e008190. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008190. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
3
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045.
国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)糖尿病地图集:2021 年全球、区域和国家糖尿病患病率估算值以及 2045 年预测值。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jan;183:109119. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Aspirin Dosing in Cardiovascular Disease.阿司匹林在心血管疾病中的剂量比较效果。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 27;384(21):1981-1990. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102137. Epub 2021 May 15.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.心脏病与中风统计-2021 更新:美国心脏协会报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: .10. 心血管疾病与风险管理: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S125-S150. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S010.
7
Rationale and Design of the Aspirin Dosing-A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) Trial.阿司匹林剂量 - 以患者为中心的试验评估获益和长期有效性(ADAPTABLE)试验的原理和设计。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):598-607. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0116.
8
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.2019年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征诊断和管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
9
2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD.2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)合作制定的糖尿病、糖尿病前期和心血管疾病指南。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 7;41(2):255-323. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486.
10
Effects of Aspirin for Primary Prevention in Persons with Diabetes Mellitus.阿司匹林用于糖尿病患者一级预防的效果。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 18;379(16):1529-1539. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804988. Epub 2018 Aug 26.