Perkins H S
J Gen Intern Med. 1986 May-Jun;1(3):170-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02602333.
Some of the physician's most difficult decisions involve whether to give cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current research, hospital policies, and case law provide little guidance for these decisions, but medical ethics offers three useful principles. All three are based on patients' wishes. First, a victim of cardiopulmonary arrest should receive CPR unless compelling reasons indicate he would not want it. Second, a patient has the right to refuse CPR. Finally, if CPR will serve no therapeutic goals defined from the patient's wishes, it should not be given. Applying these principles requires a sympathetic, directed history which elicits the patient's wishes relevant to resuscitation. This article uses an actual case and a simple algorithm to show how these principles promote ethically sound resuscitation decisions.
医生面临的一些最艰难的决定涉及是否进行心肺复苏(CPR)。目前的研究、医院政策和判例法在这些决定上几乎没有提供指导,但医学伦理学提供了三条有用的原则。这三条原则都基于患者的意愿。首先,心肺骤停的受害者应接受心肺复苏,除非有令人信服的理由表明他不希望接受。其次,患者有权拒绝心肺复苏。最后,如果心肺复苏无法实现根据患者意愿确定的治疗目标,则不应进行。应用这些原则需要进行一次富有同情心、有针对性的问诊,以了解患者与复苏相关的意愿。本文通过一个实际案例和一个简单的算法,展示这些原则如何促进符合伦理的复苏决策。