• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问答过程中的应答规划:做出说什么的决定是否包含做出如何说的决定?

Response planning during question-answering: does deciding what to say involve deciding how to say it?

机构信息

Psychology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):839-848. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02382-3. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-023-02382-3
PMID:37740119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11061006/
Abstract

To answer a question, speakers must determine their response and formulate it in words. But do they decide on a response before formulation, or do they formulate different potential answers before selecting one? We addressed this issue in a verbal question-answering experiment. Participants answered questions more quickly when they had one potential answer (e.g., Which tourist attraction in Paris is very tall?) than when they had multiple potential answers (e.g., What is the name of a Shakespeare play?). Participants also answered more quickly when the set of potential answers were on average short rather than long, regardless of whether there was only one or multiple potential answers. Thus, participants were not affected by the linguistic complexity of unselected but plausible answers. These findings suggest that participants select a single answer before formulation.

摘要

为了回答一个问题,说话者必须确定他们的回答并将其用言语表达出来。但是,他们是在形成答案之前就决定了回答,还是在选择一个回答之前先形成了不同的潜在回答?我们在一个口头问答实验中解决了这个问题。与有多个潜在答案(例如,巴黎的哪个旅游景点非常高?)相比,当参与者只有一个潜在答案(例如,莎士比亚的哪部戏剧?)时,他们回答问题的速度更快。无论潜在答案是一个还是多个,当潜在答案的平均长度较短而不是较长时,参与者的回答速度也会更快。因此,参与者不会受到未被选中但合理的答案的语言复杂性的影响。这些发现表明,参与者在形成答案之前先选择一个单一的答案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4af/11061006/8f37f4e9b0e9/13423_2023_2382_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4af/11061006/282c1807cba8/13423_2023_2382_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4af/11061006/8f37f4e9b0e9/13423_2023_2382_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4af/11061006/282c1807cba8/13423_2023_2382_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4af/11061006/8f37f4e9b0e9/13423_2023_2382_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Response planning during question-answering: does deciding what to say involve deciding how to say it?问答过程中的应答规划:做出说什么的决定是否包含做出如何说的决定?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):839-848. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02382-3. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
2
The role of answer content and length when preparing answers to questions.准备回答问题时,答案内容和长度的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):17110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68253-6.
3
SemBioNLQA: A semantic biomedical question answering system for retrieving exact and ideal answers to natural language questions.SemBioNLQA:一个语义生物医学问答系统,用于检索自然语言问题的准确和理想答案。
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jan;102:101767. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101767. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
4
Cross-linguistic contrasts of verification and answering among children.儿童验证与回答的跨语言对比
J Psycholinguist Res. 1992 Mar;21(2):67-85. doi: 10.1007/BF01067988.
5
Turn-taking, timing, and planning in early language acquisition.早期语言习得中的轮流发言、时机把握与规划
J Child Lang. 2016 Nov;43(6):1310-37. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000689. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
6
Answering questions and explaining answers: a study of Finnish-speaking children.回答问题与解释答案:一项针对说芬兰语儿童的研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2008 May;37(3):219-41. doi: 10.1007/s10936-007-9067-6.
7
How do listeners time response articulation when answering questions? The role of speech rate.当回答问题时,听众如何对发音进行时间响应?语速的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(4):781-802. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000759. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
8
Unpriming or strategizing? A critique of Sparrow and Wegner.去启动化还是策略化?对斯派洛和韦格纳的批判。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e87512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087512. eCollection 2014.
9
Words we do not say-Context effects on the phonological activation of lexical alternatives in speech production.我们未说出的话语——语境对言语产生中词汇替代项语音激活的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jun;43(6):1194-1206. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000352. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
10
Brief encounters ending in estrangement: motivated language use and interpersonal rapport in the question-answer paradigm.以疏远告终的短暂相遇:问答范式中的动机性语言使用与人际融洽关系
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 May;72(5):1047-60. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1047.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of answer content and length when preparing answers to questions.准备回答问题时,答案内容和长度的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 24;14(1):17110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68253-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Web-based language production experiments: Semantic interference assessment is robust for spoken and typed response modalities.基于网络的语言产生实验:语义干扰评估对口语和打字两种反应方式都具有稳健性。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):236-262. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01768-2. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
2
Workflow techniques for the robust use of bayes factors.贝叶斯因子稳健应用的工作流技术。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Dec;28(6):1404-1426. doi: 10.1037/met0000472. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
Internet-based language production research with overt articulation: Proof of concept, challenges, and practical advice.
基于互联网的言语发声语言产生研究:概念验证、挑战与实用建议。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):1954-1975. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01686-3. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
4
Can we use the internet to study speech production? Yes we can! Evidence contrasting online versus laboratory naming latencies and errors.我们可以利用互联网研究言语产生吗?是的,我们可以!在线和实验室命名潜伏期和错误的对比证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 22;16(10):e0258908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258908. eCollection 2021.
5
Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R.在(广义)线性混合模型中估计功效:在 R 中的开放介绍和教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2528-2543. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0. Epub 2021 May 5.
6
Dual-tasking with simple linguistic tasks: Evidence for serial processing.与简单语言任务的双重任务处理:串行处理的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:131-148. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
7
Early preparation during turn-taking: Listeners use content predictions to determine what to say but not when to say it.在对话轮替中提前准备:听者利用内容预测来确定说什么,但不能确定何时说。
Cognition. 2018 Jun;175:77-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
8
Event models and the fan effect.事件模型与扇形效应
Mem Cognit. 2017 Aug;45(6):1028-1044. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0713-4.
9
Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation.在对话中,对即将到来的问题进行反应规划的神经信号出现在问题提出过程的中途。
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 5;5:12881. doi: 10.1038/srep12881.
10
jsPsych: a JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser.jsPsych:一个在网页浏览器中创建行为实验的 JavaScript 库。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Mar;47(1):1-12. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y.