Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Int J Cancer. 2024 Feb 15;154(4):615-625. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34740. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
The burden of digestive cancers is increasing worldwide. The Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) 2020 and the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 are two primary cancer databases, which have a significant impact on policy formulation and resource allocation. We aim to compare the incidence and mortality of digestive cancers between them. Digestive cancer (esophageal, stomach, colorectal, liver, gallbladder and pancreatic cancer) incidence was obtained from the Cancer Today and GBD 2019 result tool. The top five countries with the most or minor difference between GLOBOCAN 2020 and GBD 2019 in age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) of digestive cancers were identified. A systematic search on the incidence of specific digestive cancer in selected countries from PubMed and Embase was conducted, and 20 of 281 publications were included. The most significant differences in digestive cancers incidence were commonly found in Asian countries (70%), particularly Indonesia, Vietnam and Myanmar, located in Southeast Asia. The ASIRs for most digestive cancers, except liver cancer, in GLOBOCAN 2020 were higher than those in GBD 2019. Gallbladder cancer had the highest average ratio, followed by liver cancer. The most commonly used standard population was Segi's standard population, followed by the World Health Organization standard population. The data sources nor the processing methods of GLOBOCAN 2020 and GBD 2019 were not similar. Low- and middle-income countries without population-based cancer registries were more likely to have selection bias in data collection and amplify regional variations of etiological factors. Better judgments on the quality of cancer data can be made.
全球范围内消化系统癌症的负担正在增加。全球癌症观察站(GLOBOCAN)2020 年和全球疾病负担(GBD)2019 年是两个主要的癌症数据库,对政策制定和资源分配有重大影响。我们旨在比较两者之间消化系统癌症的发病率和死亡率。消化系统癌症(食管癌、胃癌、结直肠癌、肝癌、胆囊癌和胰腺癌)的发病率来自癌症今日和 GBD 2019 结果工具。确定了 GLOBOCAN 2020 年和 GBD 2019 年之间消化系统癌症年龄标准化发病率(ASIR)差异最大或最小的前五个国家。对 PubMed 和 Embase 中选定国家特定消化系统癌症的发病率进行了系统搜索,共纳入了 281 篇出版物中的 20 篇。消化系统癌症发病率的差异最大的通常是亚洲国家(70%),特别是位于东南亚的印度尼西亚、越南和缅甸。GLOBOCAN 2020 中除肝癌外的大多数消化系统癌症的 ASIR 均高于 GBD 2019。胆囊癌的平均比值最高,其次是肝癌。最常用的标准人群是 Segi 标准人群,其次是世界卫生组织标准人群。GLOBOCAN 2020 和 GBD 2019 的数据源和处理方法并不相似。没有基于人群的癌症登记处的中低收入国家在数据收集方面更容易出现选择偏倚,并放大病因因素的区域差异。可以对癌症数据的质量做出更好的判断。