Suppr超能文献

共情准确性任务:印度改编与验证

Empathic Accuracy Task: Indian Adaptation and Validation.

作者信息

Sinha Preeti, Mehta Urvakhsh M, S N Anuradha, Srivastava Prerna

机构信息

Dept. of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Dept. of Psychiatry, SDM College of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychol Med. 2023 Sep;45(5):486-495. doi: 10.1177/02537176221141583. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Empathic Accuracy Task (EAT) is an objective measure to assess empathic accuracy. Due to the variability in the number and linked emotions of the narrated events, we adapted EAT for the Indian sociocultural setting as Indian EAT (I-EAT).

METHODS

Eight videos were adapted in three languages (English, Hindi, and Kannada), narrating emotional events with a uniform representation of age groups, different emotions, and sex. The adapted I-EAT was then validated by cross-sectional comparison with different tests similar to EAT and those that assessed concepts different from or similar to empathy, in 29 healthy young adults, 23 healthy older adults (aged ≥60 years) along with clinical groups of 15 young people with depression, 15 older people with depression, and 15 young people with schizophrenia.

RESULTS

We selected eight videos with good content validity and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.73. We obtained satisfactory concurrent validity of the EAT scores with the self-reported empathic assessments using the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (Cognitive empathy score = 0.29, = .034; Total score = 0.29, .035) and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Empathic concern score = 0.45, .001). Good divergent validity was revealed in the high inverse correlation recorded with the Apathy Evaluation Scale ( = -0.67, < .001). I-EAT did not correlate significantly with measures of social cognition. Known-groups validity was adequate in young adults with the significantly lower EAT scores (Cohen's : 0.77 to 1.15) in the Schizophrenia group and higher EAT-N scores (Cohen's : 0.51) in the Depression group, compared to the Healthy group. The Healthy group of the geriatric population also achieved significantly higher EAT scores (Cohen's : 0.71 to 0.85) than the Depression group.

CONCLUSION

With a good validity and internal consistency, I-EAT can be used in the Indian population to assess empathic accuracy without compromising performance of the original EAT.

摘要

背景

共情准确性任务(EAT)是一种评估共情准确性的客观方法。由于所叙述事件的数量和相关情绪存在差异,我们针对印度社会文化背景对EAT进行了改编,即印度EAT(I-EAT)。

方法

八个视频被翻译成三种语言(英语、印地语和卡纳达语),讲述了具有统一年龄组、不同情绪和性别的情感事件。然后,在29名健康年轻人、23名健康老年人(年龄≥60岁)以及15名患有抑郁症的年轻人、15名患有抑郁症的老年人和15名患有精神分裂症的年轻人的临床组中,通过与类似于EAT的不同测试以及评估与共情不同或相似概念的测试进行横断面比较,对改编后的I-EAT进行验证。

结果

我们选择了八个具有良好内容效度和内部一致性的视频(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.73)。我们使用认知与情感共情问卷(认知共情得分 = 0.29,P = 0.034;总分 = 0.29,P = .035)和人际反应指数(共情关注得分 = 0.45,P < .001)进行自我报告的共情评估,获得了EAT得分令人满意的同时效度。在与冷漠评估量表记录的高度负相关中显示出良好的区分效度(r = -0.67,P < .001)。I-EAT与社会认知测量指标无显著相关性。与健康组相比,精神分裂症组中EAT得分显著较低(科恩d值:0.77至1.15),抑郁症组中EAT-N得分较高(科恩d值:0.51),已知组效度在年轻人中足够。老年健康组的EAT得分也显著高于抑郁症组(科恩d值:0.71至0.85)。

结论

I-EAT具有良好的效度和内部一致性,可用于印度人群评估共情准确性,而不会影响原始EAT的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9168/10523519/6dfbebbc2071/10.1177_02537176221141583-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验