• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有实施科学研究亲身经历的研究人员的观点:缩小物质使用护理系统中研究与实践差距的机会。

Perspectives of researchers with lived experience in implementation science research: Opportunities to close the research-to-practice gap in substance use systems of care.

作者信息

Cioffi Camille C, Hibbard Patrick F, Hagaman Angela, Tillson Martha, Vest Noel

机构信息

University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, USA.

出版信息

Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jun 26;4:26334895231180635. doi: 10.1177/26334895231180635. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/26334895231180635
PMID:37790184
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10326466/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The field of implementation science acknowledges the importance of diversity within research teams including members from diverse disciplines and with lived expertise in practical implementation (e.g., administrators, front-line workers, patients/clients). Gaps remain in the successful implementation of proven substance use treatment interventions.

METHODS

This paper will outline the rationale for the purposeful inclusion of researchers with lived experience (RLE) related to substance use disorder (SUD) within implementation science research studies focused on improving SUD services.

RESULTS

We posit that researchers with such experience can help address research-to-practice gaps by (1) building strong community partnerships, (2) engaging in conversations around effective interventions through knowledge translation, (3) providing community-congruent approaches to evaluation, and (4) aiding in dissemination and sustainability efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

We end by offering recommendations for researchers without lived experience as they intentionally collaborate with RLE.

摘要

背景

实施科学领域认识到研究团队中多样性的重要性,包括来自不同学科以及在实际实施方面有实际经验的成员(例如管理人员、一线工作者、患者/客户)。在成功实施经过验证的物质使用治疗干预措施方面仍存在差距。

方法

本文将概述在专注于改善物质使用障碍(SUD)服务的实施科学研究中,有目的地纳入与物质使用障碍(SUD)相关的有生活经验(RLE)的研究人员的基本原理。

结果

我们认为,有此类经验的研究人员可以通过以下方式帮助弥合研究与实践之间的差距:(1)建立强大的社区伙伴关系;(2)通过知识转化围绕有效干预措施进行对话;(3)提供符合社区情况的评估方法;(4)协助传播和可持续性工作。

结论

我们最后为没有生活经验的研究人员在有意与有生活经验的研究人员合作时提供建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/74b29787e6d0/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/ab4972bf83c7/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/6e64a4bafde7/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/f13ed65b9cce/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/8f9a306ac503/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/6a70d1fcd202/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/74b29787e6d0/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/ab4972bf83c7/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/6e64a4bafde7/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/f13ed65b9cce/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/8f9a306ac503/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/6a70d1fcd202/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf23/10326466/74b29787e6d0/10.1177_26334895231180635-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Perspectives of researchers with lived experience in implementation science research: Opportunities to close the research-to-practice gap in substance use systems of care.有实施科学研究亲身经历的研究人员的观点:缩小物质使用护理系统中研究与实践差距的机会。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jun 26;4:26334895231180635. doi: 10.1177/26334895231180635. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Actualizing community-academic partnerships in research: a case study on rural perinatal peer support.在研究中实现社区与学术机构的合作:一项关于农村围产期同伴支持的案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 18;8(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00407-0.
3
Co-creation of new knowledge: Good fortune or good management?新知识的共同创造:是运气还是良好管理?
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 29;8(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00394-2.
4
Opportunities and challenges in involving people with lived experience of inclusion health as co-researchers in palliative and end of life research: a rapid review and thematic synthesis.将有包容性健康生活经历的人纳入姑息治疗和临终研究共同研究者的机遇与挑战:快速回顾与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 20;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00436-3.
5
Discussing the gaps in the science and practice of lived experience engagement in mental health and substance use research: results of knowledge mobilization activities.探讨心理健康与物质使用研究中生活经历参与的科学与实践差距:知识传播活动的结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 10;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00554-6.
6
Optimizing our evidence map for cognitive-communication interventions: How it can guide us to better outcomes for adults living with acquired brain injury.优化我们的认知-沟通干预措施证据图谱:它如何指导我们为后天性脑损伤成年人提供更好的结果。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):623-647. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12817. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
7
Engaging a person with lived experience of mental illness in a collaborative care model feasibility study.让有精神疾病亲身经历的人参与一项协作式照护模式可行性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00247-w.
8
Research evidence and implementation gaps in the engagement of people with lived experience in mental health and substance use research: a scoping review.有过精神健康和物质使用经历的人群参与心理健康和物质使用研究的研究证据与实施差距:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 11;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00442-5.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Collaborating with health economists to advance implementation science: a qualitative study.与卫生经济学家合作以推进实施科学:一项定性研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Sep 29;1:82. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00074-w. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Dismantling Barriers in Professional Psychology: Supporting Formerly Justice-Involved Students and Trainees.消除职业心理学中的障碍:支持曾经涉及司法事务的学生和实习生。
Train Educ Prof Psychol. 2025 Aug;19(3):245-252. doi: 10.1037/tep0000515. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Engaging people with lived experience of psychological disorders: Current research and future directions for community-engaged measure development in psychological science.让有心理障碍亲身经历的人参与进来:心理学领域社区参与式测量发展的当前研究与未来方向。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jul;13(4):720-739. doi: 10.1177/21677026241304339. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Recovery housing and on-the-ground research priorities: a scoping study through the lens of community based participatory research.

本文引用的文献

1
Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review.社区参与传播与实施模式:一项叙述性综述。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Feb 1;2:2633489520985305. doi: 10.1177/2633489520985305. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Application of an antiracism lens in the field of implementation science (IS): Recommendations for reframing implementation research with a focus on justice and racial equity.反种族主义视角在实施科学(IS)领域的应用:以公正和种族平等为重点重新构建实施研究的建议。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Nov 26;2:26334895211049482. doi: 10.1177/26334895211049482. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
康复住房与实地研究重点:基于社区参与式研究视角的范围界定研究
Front Public Health. 2025 May 22;13:1554344. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1554344. eCollection 2025.
4
Substance use disorder recovery research opportunities: perspectives from a federal interagency workgroup.物质使用障碍康复研究机会:来自联邦跨部门工作组的观点
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;13:1585533. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1585533. eCollection 2025.
5
The power of lived experience in optimizing US policymakers' engagement with substance use research: A series of rapid-cycle randomized controlled trials.生活经历在优化美国政策制定者参与药物使用研究方面的作用:一系列快速循环随机对照试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Nov 15;13:100299. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100299. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Linkage facilitation for opioid use disorder in criminal legal system contexts: a primer for researchers, clinicians, and legal practitioners.刑事法律系统背景下阿片类物质使用障碍的联动促进:研究人员、临床医生和法律从业者入门指南
Health Justice. 2024 Aug 29;12(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00291-8.
7
Linkage facilitation services for opioid use disorder: Taxonomy of facilitation practitioners, goals, and activities.阿片类药物使用障碍的联系促进服务:促进者的分类、目标和活动。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Feb;157:209217. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209217. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
Client Characteristics Associated with Desire for Additional Services at Syringe Exchange Programs.
与注射器交换项目中对额外服务的需求相关的客户特征。
J Subst Use. 2022;27(6):604-610. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2021.1967486. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
4
The Crucial Role of Black, Latinx, and Indigenous Leadership in Harm Reduction and Addiction Treatment.黑人、拉丁裔和原住民领导力在减少伤害及成瘾治疗中的关键作用。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Apr;112(S2):S136-S139. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306807.
5
Expanding the continuum of substance use disorder treatment: Nonabstinence approaches.扩展物质使用障碍治疗的连续体:非戒除方法。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Feb;91:102110. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102110. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
6
Voluntary Pregnancy Screening at Syringe Exchanges: A Feasibility Study.注射器交换点的自愿妊娠筛查:一项可行性研究。
J Prev Health Promot. 2021 Jul 1;2(1):57-80. doi: 10.1177/2632077020973362. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
Intervention Stigma toward Medications for Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Review.干预污名化与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗:系统综述
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(14):2181-2201. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1975749. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
8
Social-Ecological Predictors of Opioid Use Among Adolescents With Histories of Substance Use Disorders.有物质使用障碍史的青少年中阿片类药物使用的社会生态预测因素
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 16;12:686414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686414. eCollection 2021.
9
A Qualitative Exploration of Addiction Disclosure and Stigma among Faculty Members in a Canadian University Context.在加拿大大学背景下对教师成瘾披露和污名的定性探索。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 7;18(14):7274. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147274.
10
Stigmatization of medications for opioid use disorder in 12-step support groups and participant responses.12步支持小组中针对阿片类药物使用障碍药物的污名化及参与者的反应。
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):415-424. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1944957. Epub 2021 Jul 2.