• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球范围内针对基层医疗保健工作者的工作场所暴力的当代证据:系统评价。

Contemporary evidence of workplace violence against the primary healthcare workforce worldwide: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

The State of Selangor Health Department, Tingkat 9, 10-11, Wisma 16 Sunway Mas, Lot 1, Jalan Persiaran Kayangan, 40100, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Hum Resour Health. 2023 Oct 13;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00868-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12960-023-00868-8
PMID:37833727
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10576303/
Abstract

Violence against healthcare workers recently became a growing public health concern and has been intensively investigated, particularly in the tertiary setting. Nevertheless, little is known of workplace violence against healthcare workers in the primary setting. Given the nature of primary healthcare, which delivers essential healthcare services to the community, many primary healthcare workers are vulnerable to violent events. Since the Alma-Ata Declaration of 1978, the number of epidemiological studies on workplace violence against primary healthcare workers has increased globally. Nevertheless, a comprehensive review summarising the significant results from previous studies has not been published. Thus, this systematic review was conducted to collect and analyse recent evidence from previous workplace violence studies in primary healthcare settings. Eligible articles published in 2013-2023 were searched from the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed literature databases. Of 23 included studies, 16 were quantitative, four were qualitative, and three were mixed method. The extracted information was analysed and grouped into four main themes: prevalence and typology, predisposing factors, implications, and coping mechanisms or preventive measures. The prevalence of violence ranged from 45.6% to 90%. The most commonly reported form of violence was verbal abuse (46.9-90.3%), while the least commonly reported was sexual assault (2-17%). Most primary healthcare workers were at higher risk of patient- and family-perpetrated violence (Type II). Three sub-themes of predisposing factors were identified: individual factors (victims' and perpetrators' characteristics), community or geographical factors, and workplace factors. There were considerable negative consequences of violence on both the victims and organisations. Under-reporting remained the key issue, which was mainly due to the negative perception of the effectiveness of existing workplace policies for managing violence. Workplace violence is a complex issue that indicates a need for more serious consideration of a resolution on par with that in other healthcare settings. Several research gaps and limitations require additional rigorous analytical and interventional research. Information pertaining to violent events must be comprehensively collected to delineate the complete scope of the issue and formulate prevention strategies based on potentially modifiable risk factors to minimise the negative implications caused by workplace violence.

摘要

最近,针对医疗工作者的暴力行为成为了一个日益严重的公共卫生问题,已经引起了广泛关注,尤其是在三级医疗机构中。然而,针对初级医疗机构中针对医疗工作者的工作场所暴力行为,我们知之甚少。鉴于初级医疗保健的性质,它为社区提供基本的医疗保健服务,许多初级医疗保健工作者容易受到暴力事件的影响。自 1978 年《阿拉木图宣言》发布以来,关于初级医疗保健工作者遭受工作场所暴力的流行病学研究在全球范围内有所增加。然而,尚未发表过一篇全面总结以往研究重要结果的综述文章。因此,进行了这项系统综述,以收集和分析初级医疗保健环境中以往工作场所暴力研究的最新证据。从 Web of Science、Scopus 和 PubMed 文献数据库中搜索了 2013 年至 2023 年期间发表的符合条件的文章。23 项纳入研究中,16 项为定量研究,4 项为定性研究,3 项为混合方法研究。提取的信息进行了分析,并分为四个主要主题:流行程度和类型、促成因素、影响以及应对机制或预防措施。暴力的流行程度从 45.6%到 90%不等。报告最多的暴力形式是言语虐待(46.9%-90.3%),而报告最少的是性侵犯(2%-17%)。大多数初级医疗保健工作者面临更高的患者和家属暴力风险(II 型)。确定了三个促成因素的子主题:个体因素(受害者和肇事者的特征)、社区或地理因素以及工作场所因素。暴力对受害者和组织都有相当大的负面影响。漏报仍然是一个关键问题,主要是因为对现有工作场所暴力管理政策的有效性存在负面看法。工作场所暴力是一个复杂的问题,表明需要更认真地考虑采取与其他医疗保健环境同等的解决方案。还需要进一步开展严格的分析和干预研究,以解决一些研究差距和局限性。必须全面收集有关暴力事件的信息,以描绘问题的全貌,并制定基于潜在可改变的风险因素的预防策略,以最大程度地减少工作场所暴力造成的负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b42/10576303/b16e4587b760/12960_2023_868_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b42/10576303/b16e4587b760/12960_2023_868_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b42/10576303/b16e4587b760/12960_2023_868_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Contemporary evidence of workplace violence against the primary healthcare workforce worldwide: a systematic review.全球范围内针对基层医疗保健工作者的工作场所暴力的当代证据:系统评价。
Hum Resour Health. 2023 Oct 13;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00868-8.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly.预防老年人受虐待的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD010321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010321.pub2.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Experiences of workplace violence among healthcare workers in home care settings: A qualitative systematic review.居家医疗保健环境中医疗工作者遭受工作场所暴力的体验:一项定性系统评价。
Int Nurs Rev. 2023 Dec;70(4):596-605. doi: 10.1111/inr.12822. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.

引用本文的文献

1
Violence in Healthcare Workers Is Associated with Disordered Eating.医护人员遭受暴力与饮食失调有关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 5;22(8):1221. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081221.
2
An Investigation on Workplace Violence in an Infectious Disease Hospital: A Mixed-Methods Study from the Perspectives of Healthcare Workers and Patients.传染病医院工作场所暴力调查:一项从医护人员和患者视角出发的混合方法研究
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Aug 11;15(8):155. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15080155.
3
Behind the white coat: Unraveling the patterns of workplace violence in an Italian healthcare setting - An epidemiological exploration.

本文引用的文献

1
Sexual Harassment and Mental Health of Female Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级护理医院中女性医护人员的性骚扰与心理健康
Cureus. 2022 Oct 29;14(10):e30860. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30860. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Sources of Conflict and Prevention Proposals in User Violence Toward Primary Care Staff: A Qualitative Study of the Perception of Professionals.用户对基层医疗保健人员暴力行为的冲突来源与预防建议:专业人员感知的定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;10:862896. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.862896. eCollection 2022.
3
Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
白大褂背后:意大利医疗环境中职场暴力模式的剖析——一项流行病学探索。
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0324545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324545. eCollection 2025.
4
Burnout syndrome and psychological workplace violence among Peruvian physicians: a cross-sectional study.秘鲁医生的职业倦怠综合征与工作场所心理暴力:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12387-4.
5
A Quantitative Analysis of Work System Factors and Well-Being Among Nurses and Physicians in Rural and Urban Settings During Covid-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间城乡护士与医生工作系统因素与幸福感的定量分析
Workplace Health Saf. 2025 Apr 25;73(9):21650799251333072. doi: 10.1177/21650799251333072.
6
Research Hotspots and Trends in Workplace Violence Among Healthcare Professionals: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis Based on Web of Science.医疗保健专业人员工作场所暴力的研究热点与趋势:基于科学网的文献计量与可视化分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Apr 15;18:2111-2129. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S508935. eCollection 2025.
7
Exploring Well-Being Disparities: A Comparative Analysis of Urban and Rural Clinicians Using the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Questionnaire.探索幸福感差异:使用美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)员工幸福感调查问卷对城乡临床医生进行的比较分析
Workplace Health Saf. 2025 Mar 18;73(8):21650799251319366. doi: 10.1177/21650799251319366.
8
Education and training interventions for healthcare workers to prevent sexual harassment.针对医护人员预防性骚扰的教育与培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD016096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016096.
9
Measuring the Risk of Violence Through Health Surveillance.通过健康监测评估暴力风险
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 22;21(12):1708. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121708.
10
Differences in workplace violence and health variables among professionals in a hospital emergency department: A descriptive-comparative study.医院急诊科专业人员工作场所暴力与健康变量的差异:一项描述性比较研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0314932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314932. eCollection 2024.
新冠疫情期间针对医护人员的工作场所暴力行为的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:896156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896156. eCollection 2022.
4
Prevalence and associated factors for workplace violence among general practitioners in China: a national cross-sectional study.中国全科医生工作场所暴力的流行状况及其相关因素:一项全国性横断面研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2022 May 16;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00736-x.
5
Assessment of Non-physical User Violence and Burnout in Primary Health Care Professionals. The Modulating Role of Job Satisfaction.评估初级保健专业人员的非身体用户暴力和倦怠。工作满意度的调节作用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 4;10:777412. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.777412. eCollection 2022.
6
Violence against physicians and nurses: a systematic literature review.针对医生和护士的暴力行为:一项系统的文献综述。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022;30(8):1837-1855. doi: 10.1007/s10389-021-01689-6. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
7
Users' Perception of Violence and Conflicts With Professionals in Primary Care Centers Before and During COVID-19. A Qualitative Study.用户对初级保健中心在 COVID-19 之前和期间与专业人员之间暴力和冲突的看法。一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;9:810014. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.810014. eCollection 2021.
8
Physician-nurse conflict resolution styles in primary health care.基层医疗中的医患冲突解决模式。
Nurs Open. 2022 Mar;9(2):1077-1085. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1147. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Violence Against Healthcare Workers at Primary Care Centers in Dammam and Al Khobar, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia, 2019.2019年沙特阿拉伯东部省达曼和胡拜尔初级保健中心针对医护人员的暴力行为
Int J Gen Med. 2020 Sep 22;13:667-676. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S267446. eCollection 2020.