Boeters Marloes, Garcia-Morante Beatriz, van Schaik Gerdien, Segalés Joaquim, Rushton Jonathan, Steeneveld Wilma
Department of Population Health Sciences, section Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
IRTA. Programa de Sanitat Animal. Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus, Bellaterra, Catalonia, 08193, Spain.
Porcine Health Manag. 2023 Oct 17;9(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00342-w.
Understanding the financial consequences of endemically prevalent pathogens within the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) and the effects of interventions assists decision-making regarding disease prevention and control. The aim of this systematic review was to identify what economic studies have been carried out on infectious endemic respiratory disease in pigs, what methods are being used, and, when feasible, to identify the economic impacts of PRDC pathogens and the costs and benefits of interventions.
By following the PRISMA method, a total of 58 studies were deemed eligible for the purpose of this systematic review. Twenty-six studies used data derived from European countries, 18 from the US, 6 from Asia, 4 from Oceania, and 4 from other countries, i.e., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. Main findings from selected publications were: (1) The studies mainly considered endemic scenarios on commercial fattening farms; (2) The porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus was by far the most studied pathogen, followed by Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, but the absence or presence of other endemic respiratory pathogens was often not verified or accounted for; (3) Most studies calculated the economic impact using primary production data, whereas twelve studies modelled the impact using secondary data only; (4) Seven different economic methods were applied across studies; (5) A large variation exists in the cost and revenue components considered in calculations, with feed costs and reduced carcass value included the most often; (6) The reported median economic impact of one or several co-existing respiratory pathogen(s) ranged from €1.70 to €8.90 per nursery pig, €2.30 to €15.35 per fattening pig, and €100 to €323 per sow per year; and (7) Vaccination was the most studied intervention, and the outcomes of all but three intervention-focused studies were neutral or positive.
The outcomes and discussion from this systematic review provide insight into the studies, their methods, the advantages and limitations of the existing research, and the reported impacts from the endemic respiratory disease complex for pig production systems worldwide. Future research should improve the consistency and comparability of economic assessments by ensuring the inclusion of high impact cost and revenue components and expressing results similarly.
了解猪呼吸道疾病综合征(PRDC)中地方性流行病原体的经济后果以及干预措施的效果,有助于在疾病预防和控制方面做出决策。本系统评价的目的是确定针对猪传染性地方性呼吸道疾病开展了哪些经济研究、使用了哪些方法,并在可行的情况下确定PRDC病原体的经济影响以及干预措施的成本和收益。
按照PRISMA方法,共有58项研究被认为符合本系统评价的目的。26项研究使用了来自欧洲国家的数据,18项来自美国,6项来自亚洲,4项来自大洋洲,4项来自其他国家,即加拿大、墨西哥和巴西。所选出版物的主要发现如下:(1)这些研究主要考虑了商品育肥场的地方性流行情况;(2)猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒是迄今为止研究最多的病原体,其次是猪肺炎支原体,但其他地方性呼吸道病原体的存在与否往往未得到验证或考虑;(3)大多数研究使用初级生产数据计算经济影响,而有12项研究仅使用二级数据对影响进行建模;(4)各项研究应用了七种不同的经济方法;(5)计算中考虑的成本和收益组成部分存在很大差异,饲料成本和胴体价值降低是最常包括的项目;(6)报告的一种或几种共存呼吸道病原体的经济影响中位数为每头保育猪1.70欧元至8.90欧元,每头育肥猪2.30欧元至15.35欧元,每头母猪每年100欧元至323欧元;(7)疫苗接种是研究最多的干预措施,除三项以干预为重点的研究外,所有研究的结果均为中性或阳性。
本系统评价的结果和讨论深入了解了相关研究、其方法、现有研究的优缺点以及报告的地方性呼吸道疾病综合征对全球养猪生产系统的影响。未来的研究应通过确保纳入高影响成本和收益组成部分并以类似方式表达结果,提高经济评估的一致性和可比性。