• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化癌症患者临床可操作性的扩展领域。

Quantifying the Expanding Landscape of Clinical Actionability for Patients with Cancer.

机构信息

Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Cancer Discov. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):49-65. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-23-0467.

DOI:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-23-0467
PMID:37849038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10784742/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

There is a continuing debate about the proportion of cancer patients that benefit from precision oncology, attributable in part to conflicting views as to which molecular alterations are clinically actionable. To quantify the expansion of clinical actionability since 2017, we annotated 47,271 solid tumors sequenced with the MSK-IMPACT clinical assay using two temporally distinct versions of the OncoKB knowledge base deployed 5 years apart. Between 2017 and 2022, we observed an increase from 8.9% to 31.6% in the fraction of tumors harboring a standard care (level 1 or 2) predictive biomarker of therapy response and an almost halving of tumors carrying nonactionable drivers (44.2% to 22.8%). In tumors with limited or no clinical actionability, TP53 (43.2%), KRAS (19.2%), and CDKN2A (12.2%) were the most frequently altered genes.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although clear progress has been made in expanding the availability of precision oncology-based treatment paradigms, our results suggest a continued unmet need for innovative therapeutic strategies, particularly for cancers with currently undruggable oncogenic drivers. See related commentary by Horak and Fröhling, p. 18. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 5.

摘要

未加标签

关于癌症患者中有多少人受益于精准肿瘤学,一直存在争议,部分原因是对于哪些分子改变具有临床可操作性存在不同意见。为了量化自 2017 年以来临床可操作性的扩展,我们使用 OncoKB 知识库的两个时间上不同的版本对使用 MSK-IMPACT 临床检测方法测序的 47271 个实体瘤进行了注释,这两个版本的知识库相隔 5 年。在 2017 年至 2022 年期间,我们观察到具有标准治疗(1 级或 2 级)治疗反应预测生物标志物的肿瘤比例从 8.9%增加到 31.6%,而具有非可操作性驱动因素的肿瘤比例几乎减半(从 44.2%降至 22.8%)。在临床可操作性有限或没有的肿瘤中,TP53(43.2%)、KRAS(19.2%)和 CDKN2A(12.2%)是最常改变的基因。

意义

尽管在扩大基于精准肿瘤学的治疗方案的可及性方面已经取得了明显的进展,但我们的结果表明,特别是对于目前无法治疗的致癌驱动因素的癌症,仍然需要创新的治疗策略。见 Horak 和 Fröhling 的相关评论,第 18 页。本文选自本期精选文章,第 5 页。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e5/10784742/0c838937b082/49fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e5/10784742/9e15b0d9daf0/49fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e5/10784742/0c838937b082/49fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e5/10784742/9e15b0d9daf0/49fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e5/10784742/0c838937b082/49fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the Expanding Landscape of Clinical Actionability for Patients with Cancer.量化癌症患者临床可操作性的扩展领域。
Cancer Discov. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):49-65. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-23-0467.
2
Clinical impact of panel gene sequencing on therapy of advanced cancers of the digestive system: a retrospective, single center study.面板基因测序对消化系统晚期癌症治疗的临床影响:一项回顾性、单中心研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12261-2.
3
Physician interpretation of genomic test results and treatment selection.医生对基因组检测结果的解读和治疗选择。
Cancer. 2018 Mar 1;124(5):966-972. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31112. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
4
Extensive genomic analysis in patients with -mutated solid tumors shows high frequencies of concurrent alterations and potential targets but has limited clinical impact.对 - 突变型实体瘤患者进行广泛的基因组分析显示,同时存在多种改变的频率较高,存在潜在的治疗靶点,但临床影响有限。
Acta Oncol. 2022 Dec;61(12):1499-1506. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2022.2156809. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
5
Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing for Precision Oncology in Rare Cancers.临床下一代测序在罕见癌症中的精准肿瘤学应用。
Mol Cancer Ther. 2018 Jul;17(7):1595-1601. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1107. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
6
Implementing the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets in a Comprehensive Profiling Program: Impact on Precision Medicine Oncology.在综合分析计划中实施欧洲肿瘤内科学会分子靶向治疗临床可操作性量表:对精准医学肿瘤学的影响。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Oct;6:e2100484. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00484.
7
OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base.OncoKB:一个精准肿瘤知识库。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00011. Epub 2017 May 16.
8
Next-Generation Sequencing in the Clinical Setting Clarifies Patient Characteristics and Potential Actionability.临床环境中的下一代测序可明确患者特征及潜在可操作性。
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 15;77(22):6313-6320. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1569. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
9
New clinical trial designs in the era of precision medicine: An overview of definitions, strengths, weaknesses, and current use in oncology.精准医学时代的新型临床试验设计:定义、优势、劣势及在肿瘤学中的应用概述。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 Feb;73:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
10
On the Road to Precision Cancer Medicine: Analysis of Genomic Biomarker Actionability in 439 Patients.通往精准癌症医学之路:439例患者的基因组生物标志物可操作性分析
Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Jun;14(6):1488-94. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-1061. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clonal diversity shapes the tumour microenvironment leading to distinct immunotherapy responses in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.克隆多样性塑造肿瘤微环境,导致转移性尿路上皮癌产生不同的免疫治疗反应。
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 27;16(1):7995. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63309-1.
2
Mutational landscape of triple-negative breast cancer in African American women.非裔美国女性三阴性乳腺癌的突变图谱
Nat Genet. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02322-y.
3
Correlation between TP53 mutational status and digital quantification of p53 immunohistochemistry in mantle cell lymphoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing in patients with metastatic cancer in the Asia-Pacific region: a report from the APODDC working group.亚太地区转移性癌症患者使用下一代测序的推荐建议:来自 APODDC 工作组的报告。
ESMO Open. 2023 Aug;8(4):101586. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101586. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
2
Adagrasib with or without Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer with Mutated G12C.在携带突变 G12C 的结直肠癌中,阿达格拉西布联合或不联合西妥昔单抗。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 5;388(1):44-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212419. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
3
Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial.
套细胞淋巴瘤中TP53突变状态与p53免疫组化数字定量之间的相关性
Virchows Arch. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04227-x.
4
Refining treatment strategies for non-small cell lung cancer lacking actionable mutations: insights from multi-omics studies.完善缺乏可靶向突变的非小细胞肺癌的治疗策略:多组学研究的见解
Br J Cancer. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03139-6.
5
Integrated molecular and clinical characterization of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.肺大细胞神经内分泌癌的综合分子与临床特征
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 19;16(1):7717. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63091-0.
6
Tracing the evolution of sequencing into the era of genomic medicine.追溯测序技术在基因组医学时代的发展历程。
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00884-5.
7
GnomAD Missense Variants of Uncertain Significance: Implications for p53 Stability and Phosphorylation.意义不确定的GnomAD错义变体:对p53稳定性和磷酸化的影响
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 1;26(15):7455. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157455.
8
Genomic Predictive Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: The and .乳腺癌中的基因组预测生物标志物:以及。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,翻译可能不太准确,你可补充完整原文后再让我翻译)
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 28;26(15):7300. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157300.
9
Implementing a context-augmented large language model to guide precision cancer medicine.实施上下文增强大语言模型以指导精准癌症医学。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 24:2025.05.09.25327312. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.09.25327312.
10
Isoform-level analyses of 6 cancers uncover extensive genetic risk mechanisms undetected at the gene-level.对6种癌症的异构体水平分析揭示了在基因水平未被发现的广泛遗传风险机制。
Br J Cancer. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03141-y.
针对非肺或甲状腺肿瘤的 RET 融合阳性实体瘤患者,塞普替尼的肿瘤不可知疗效和安全性(LIBRETTO-001):一项 1/2 期、开放标签、篮子试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-1273. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00541-1. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
4
Standards for the classification of pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer (oncogenicity): Joint recommendations of Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC).癌症体细胞变异致病性分类标准(致癌性):临床基因组资源(ClinGen)、癌症基因组学联盟(CGC)和癌症变异解读联盟(VICC)的联合建议
Genet Med. 2022 Sep;24(9):1991. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.001.
5
Clinical application of advanced multi-omics tumor profiling: Shaping precision oncology of the future.先进的多组学肿瘤分析的临床应用:塑造未来的精准肿瘤学。
Cancer Cell. 2022 Sep 12;40(9):920-938. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
6
Genetic Ancestry Correlates with Somatic Differences in a Real-World Clinical Cancer Sequencing Cohort.遗传背景与真实世界临床癌症测序队列中的体细胞差异相关。
Cancer Discov. 2022 Nov 2;12(11):2552-2565. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0312.
7
Patient selection for CAR T or BiTE therapy in multiple myeloma: Which treatment for each patient?多发性骨髓瘤中 CAR T 或 BiTE 治疗的患者选择:每位患者的哪种治疗方法?
J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Jun 7;15(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01296-2.
8
Adagrasib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring a Mutation.在携带有突变的非小细胞肺癌中使用阿达格拉西布。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 14;387(2):120-131. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204619. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Somatic Genomic Testing in Patients With Metastatic or Advanced Cancer: ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion.实体瘤患者的体细胞基因组检测:ASCO 临时临床观点。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr 10;40(11):1231-1258. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02767. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
10
Axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (ZUMA-5): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.阿基仑赛注射液治疗复发或难治性惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(ZUMA-5):一项单臂、多中心、2 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):91-103. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00591-X. Epub 2021 Dec 8.