Poulsen John R, Maicher Vincent, Malinowski Halina, DeSisto Camille
The Nature Conservancy, Boulder, Colorado, United States.
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Bioscience. 2023 Sep 19;73(10):721-727. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biad079. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Anthropogenic pressures are causing the widespread loss of wildlife species and populations, with adverse consequences for ecosystem functioning. This phenomenon has been widely but inconsistently referred to as . A cohesive, quantitative framework for defining and evaluating defaunation is necessary for advancing biodiversity conservation. Likening defaunation to deforestation, we propose an operational framework for defaunation that defines it and related terms, situates defaunation relative to intact communities and faunal degradation, and encourages quantitative, ecologically reasonable, and equitable measurements. We distinguish between , the conversion of an ecosystem from having wild animals to not having wild animals, and , the process of losing animals or species from an animal community. The quantification of context-relevant defaunation boundaries or baselines is necessary to compare faunal communities over space and time. Situating a faunal community on the degradation curve can promote Global Biodiversity Framework targets, advancing the 2050 Vision for Biodiversity.
人为压力正在导致野生动物物种和种群的广泛丧失,对生态系统功能产生不利影响。这种现象被广泛但不一致地称为 。一个用于定义和评估动物群消失的连贯的定量框架对于推进生物多样性保护是必要的。将动物群消失比作森林砍伐,我们提出了一个动物群消失的操作框架,该框架定义了它及相关术语,将动物群消失相对于完整群落和动物群退化进行定位,并鼓励进行定量、生态合理且公平的测量。我们区分了 ,即生态系统从有野生动物转变为没有野生动物的过程,以及 ,即动物群落中动物或物种丧失的过程。量化与背景相关的动物群消失边界或基线对于比较不同时空的动物群落是必要的。将动物群落置于退化曲线上可以促进全球生物多样性框架目标的实现,推进2050年生物多样性愿景。