Johnston Daniel T, Thaxter Chris B, Boersch-Supan Philipp H, Davies Jacob G, Clewley Gary D, Green Ros M W, Shamoun-Baranes Judy, Cook Aonghais S C P, Burton Niall H K, Humphreys Elizabeth M
British Trust for Ornithology Scotland, Stirling University Innovation Park, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK.
British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU, UK.
Mov Ecol. 2023 Oct 21;11(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40462-023-00431-z.
The risk posed by offshore wind farms to seabirds through collisions with turbine blades is greatly influenced by species-specific flight behaviour. Bird-borne telemetry devices may provide improved measurement of aspects of bird behaviour, notably individual and behaviour specific flight heights. However, use of data from devices that use the GPS or barometric altimeters in the gathering of flight height data is nevertheless constrained by a current lack of understanding of the error and calibration of these methods. Uncertainty remains regarding the degree to which errors associated with these methods can affect recorded flight heights, which may in turn have a significant influence on estimates of collision risk produced by Collision Risk Models (CRMs), which incorporate flight height distribution as an input. Using GPS/barometric altimeter tagged Lesser Black-backed Gulls Larus fuscus from two breeding colonies in the UK, we examine comparative flight heights produced by these devices, and their associated errors. We present a novel method of calibrating barometric altimeters using behaviour characterised from GPS data and open-source modelled atmospheric pressure. We examine the magnitude of difference between offshore flight heights produced from GPS and altimeters, comparing these measurements across sampling schedules, colonies, and years. We found flight heights produced from altimeter data to be significantly, although not consistently, higher than those produced from GPS data. This relationship was sustained across differing sampling schedules of five minutes and of 10 s, and between study colonies. We found the magnitude of difference between GPS and altimeter derived flight heights to also vary between individuals, potentially related to the robustness of calibration factors used. Collision estimates for theoretical wind farms were consequently significantly higher when using flight height distributions generated from barometric altimeters. Improving confidence in telemetry-obtained flight height distributions, which may then be applied to CRMs, requires sources of errors in these measurements to be identified. Our study improves knowledge of the calibration processes for flight height measurements based on telemetry data, with the aim of increasing confidence in their use in future assessments of collision risk and reducing the uncertainty over predicted mortality associated with wind farms.
海上风电场通过与涡轮机叶片碰撞对海鸟构成的风险,在很大程度上受到物种特定飞行行为的影响。鸟类携带的遥测设备可以更好地测量鸟类行为的各个方面,特别是个体特定和行为特定的飞行高度。然而,在收集飞行高度数据时,使用来自配备全球定位系统(GPS)或气压高度计的设备的数据,仍然受到目前对这些方法的误差和校准缺乏了解的限制。与这些方法相关的误差在多大程度上会影响记录的飞行高度,进而对碰撞风险模型(CRM)产生的碰撞风险估计产生重大影响,目前仍不确定。碰撞风险模型将飞行高度分布作为输入。我们使用来自英国两个繁殖地、带有GPS/气压高度计标签的小黑背鸥(Larus fuscus),研究了这些设备产生的比较飞行高度及其相关误差。我们提出了一种新的校准气压高度计的方法,该方法利用从GPS数据和开源模拟大气压力中表征的行为。我们研究了GPS和高度计产生的海上飞行高度之间的差异幅度,比较了不同采样时间表、繁殖地和年份的这些测量值。我们发现,尽管并非始终如此,但高度计数据产生的飞行高度明显高于GPS数据产生的飞行高度。这种关系在5分钟和10秒的不同采样时间表以及研究繁殖地之间都持续存在。我们发现,GPS和高度计得出的飞行高度之间的差异幅度在个体之间也有所不同,这可能与所使用校准因子的稳健性有关。因此,当使用气压高度计产生的飞行高度分布时,理论风电场的碰撞估计值会显著更高。要提高对通过遥测获得的飞行高度分布的信心(这些分布随后可应用于碰撞风险模型),就需要识别这些测量中的误差来源。我们的研究增进了对基于遥测数据的飞行高度测量校准过程的了解,目的是提高对其在未来碰撞风险评估中的使用信心,并减少与风电场相关的预测死亡率的不确定性。