• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

"单身女性和单身男性的性别歧视与刻板印象:混合方法分析。"

"Cat Ladies" and "Mama's Boys": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Gendered Discrimination and Stereotypes of Single Women and Single Men.

机构信息

Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Feb;50(2):314-328. doi: 10.1177/01461672231203123. Epub 2023 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1177/01461672231203123
PMID:37876182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10860362/
Abstract

Do single women and single men differ in their experiences of "singlism"? This mixed-methods research examined whether single women and single men report quantitative differences in amounts of singlehood-based discrimination and explored qualitative reports of stereotypic traits associated with single women and single men. We recruited Canadian and American single adults across two Prolific studies (total 286). The results demonstrated that single female and male participants did not differ in their personal discrimination, but female participants perceived single women to experience more discrimination than single men. Furthermore, qualitative analyses revealed four overlapping "archetypes" of single women and men including: ("independent," "hard-working"), ("free," "fun"), ("selfish," "promiscuous"), and ("lonely," "antisocial"). Overall, single women and men may experience similar stereotypes and discrimination, but there are also important nuances that highlight the need for more research at the intersection of gender and singlehood.

摘要

单身女性和单身男性在“单身歧视”方面的经历是否不同?这项混合方法研究考察了单身女性和单身男性在基于单身的歧视程度上是否存在数量上的差异,并探讨了与单身女性和单身男性相关的刻板印象特征的定性报告。我们在两个 Prolific 研究(共 286 名)中招募了加拿大和美国的单身成年人。结果表明,单身女性和男性参与者在个人歧视方面没有差异,但女性参与者认为单身女性比单身男性经历更多的歧视。此外,定性分析揭示了单身女性和男性的四个重叠“原型”,包括:(“独立”、“努力工作”)、(“自由”、“有趣”)、(“自私”、“滥交”)和(“孤独”、“反社会”)。总的来说,单身女性和男性可能会经历类似的刻板印象和歧视,但也有一些重要的细微差别,这凸显了在性别和单身交叉点进行更多研究的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/219e/10860362/c5bb50b61e3e/10.1177_01461672231203123-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/219e/10860362/c5bb50b61e3e/10.1177_01461672231203123-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/219e/10860362/c5bb50b61e3e/10.1177_01461672231203123-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
"Cat Ladies" and "Mama's Boys": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Gendered Discrimination and Stereotypes of Single Women and Single Men."单身女性和单身男性的性别歧视与刻板印象:混合方法分析。"
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Feb;50(2):314-328. doi: 10.1177/01461672231203123. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
2
Gender Stereotypes and Discrimination: How Sexism Impacts Development.性别刻板印象与歧视:性别歧视如何影响发展。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;50:105-33. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.11.001. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
3
Gender Stereotypes.性别刻板印象。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:275-298. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Differences between prescriptive and proscriptive gender stereotypes and gendered self-evaluations in Sweden.瑞典规定性和禁止性性别刻板印象与性别自我评价之间的差异。
Scand J Psychol. 2024 Jun;65(3):511-520. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12995. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
5
Prejudices in Cultural Contexts: Shared Stereotypes (Gender, Age) Versus Variable Stereotypes (Race, Ethnicity, Religion).文化背景下的偏见:共享刻板印象(性别、年龄)与可变刻板印象(种族、民族、宗教)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;12(5):791-799. doi: 10.1177/1745691617708204.
6
Evolution of Gender Stereotypes in Spain: From 1985 to 2018.西班牙性别刻板印象的演变:1985 年至 2018 年。
Psicothema. 2021 Feb;33(1):53-59. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2020.328.
7
When Using a Negative Gender Stereotype as an Excuse Increases Gender Stereotyping in Others.当将负面性别刻板印象用作借口时,会增加他人的性别刻板印象。
J Soc Psychol. 2016;156(2):202-10. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1090945. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
8
Everything changes but nothing changes: gender stereotypes in the Italian population.一切都在变,但一切不变:意大利人群中的性别刻板印象。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2024 Aug;27(4):537-545. doi: 10.1007/s00737-024-01437-1. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
9
Experiences of the gender climate in clinical training - a focus group study among Swedish medical students.临床培训中的性别氛围体验——瑞典医学生焦点小组研究
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 26;16(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0803-1.
10
Boys and girls, men and women: Do children take stimulus age into account when expressing gender stereotypes?男孩和女孩,男人和女人:儿童在表达性别刻板印象时是否考虑刺激年龄?
Dev Psychol. 2023 Apr;59(4):637-643. doi: 10.1037/dev0001504. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Who does singlehood best? A latent profile analysis.谁最能享受单身生活?一项潜在类别分析。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 21;16:1509349. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1509349. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Let's Talk About Single Men: A Qualitative Investigation of Never Married Men's Experiences of Singlehood.谈谈单身男性:对未婚男性单身经历的质性调查。
Sex Roles. 2023 May 18:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11199-023-01380-y.
2
Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA.在线人体研究中的数据质量:MTurk、ProLific、CloudResearch、Qualtrics 和 SONA 之间的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 14;18(3):e0279720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279720. eCollection 2023.
3
Coping or Thriving? Reviewing Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Societal Factors Associated With Well-Being in Singlehood From a Within-Group Perspective.
应对还是茁壮成长?从群组内视角回顾与单身幸福感相关的个体内、个体间和社会因素。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):1097-1120. doi: 10.1177/17456916221136119. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
4
Unsupported and Stigmatized? The Association Between Relationship Status and Well-Being Is Mediated by Social Support and Social Discrimination.不受支持且受污名化?恋爱状况与幸福感之间的关联由社会支持和社会歧视介导。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2022 Mar;13(2):425-435. doi: 10.1177/19485506211030102. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
5
An Exploration of the Involuntary Celibate (Incel) Subculture Online.探索网络上的独身(Incel)亚文化。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP4981-NP5008. doi: 10.1177/0886260520959625. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
The unintended consequences of maternity leaves: How agency interventions mitigate the negative effects of longer legislated maternity leaves.产假的意外后果:代理干预如何减轻更长立法产假的负面影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Oct;103(10):1155-1164. doi: 10.1037/apl0000327. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
7
Weighed down by stigma: How weight-based social identity threat contributes to weight gain and poor health.受污名化的重压:基于体重的社会身份威胁如何导致体重增加和健康状况不佳。
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2015 Jun;9(6):255-268. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12172. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text].研究设计:定性、定量和混合方法研究路径 研究设计:定性、定量和混合方法研究路径 克雷斯韦尔·约翰·W 塞奇出版社 320页 29英镑 0761924426 0761924426 [公式:见正文]
Nurse Res. 2004 Sep 1;12(1):82-83. doi: 10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2.
9
Signs of Change? At-Home and Breadwinner Parents' Housework and Child-Care Time.变化的迹象?居家父母和养家糊口型父母的家务及育儿时间
J Marriage Fam. 2017 Apr;79(2):511-534. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12376. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
10
The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: a meta-analytic review.感知歧视对心理健康的影响:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):921-48. doi: 10.1037/a0035754. Epub 2014 Feb 17.