Suppr超能文献

双固化大块充填修复材料的固化深度、吸附性和溶解性

The Depth of Cure, Sorption and Solubility of Dual-Cured Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials.

作者信息

Alzahrani Bashayer, Alshabib Abdulrahman, Awliya Wedad

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 13;16(20):6673. doi: 10.3390/ma16206673.

Abstract

This study aimed to examine depth of cure (DoC), mass change, water sorption and solubility of dual-cured bulk-fill restorative materials (Surfil One and Activa) in comparison with a light-cured bulk-fill composite (Filtek One Bulk-Fill) and a resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC). Twenty specimens were prepared of each material using stainless steel molds designed with a slot (8 × 4 × 2 mm) and irradiated for either 20 or 40 s. The Vickers hardness (VHN) was measured at every 0.5 mm to assess the DoC after 24 h of storage at 37 °C. The depth of cure was reported as the depth corresponding to 80% of the maximum Vickers hardness. Disc-shaped specimens were prepared of each material ( = 5) to investigate mass change, sorption and solubility after 4 months of water storage. The data were analyzed using a two-way and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey post hoc test ( ≤ 0.05). Fuji II LC had the greatest DoC while Activa had the lowest. The two different irradiation times did not demonstrate a significant difference in DoC for all dual-cured materials ( > 0.05). Fuji II LC had the highest sorption while Filtek One showed the lowest. Surefil One and Fuji II LC had a negative solubility. This study concluded that dual-cured materials showed different depth of cure values despite having the same setting reaction. Both materials exhibited a high water sorption, which might jeopardize their dimensional stability and effect their clinical performance.

摘要

本研究旨在检测双固化大块充填修复材料(Surfil One和Activa)的固化深度、质量变化、吸水性和溶解性,并与光固化大块充填复合树脂(Filtek One Bulk-Fill)和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(Fuji II LC)进行比较。使用设计有狭槽(8×4×2 mm)的不锈钢模具为每种材料制备20个样本,并分别照射20秒或40秒。在37℃储存24小时后,每隔0.5 mm测量维氏硬度(VHN)以评估固化深度。固化深度报告为对应最大维氏硬度80%的深度。为每种材料制备圆盘形样本(n = 5),以研究在水储存4个月后的质量变化、吸附和溶解性。使用双向和单向方差分析(ANOVA),随后进行Tukey事后检验(p≤0.05)对数据进行分析。Fuji II LC的固化深度最大,而Activa的固化深度最小。对于所有双固化材料,两种不同的照射时间在固化深度上未显示出显著差异(p>0.05)。Fuji II LC的吸水性最高,而Filtek One的吸水性最低。Surefil One和Fuji II LC具有负溶解度。本研究得出结论,尽管双固化材料具有相同的固化反应,但它们的固化深度值不同。两种材料均表现出高吸水性,这可能会损害其尺寸稳定性并影响其临床性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d49/10608248/3e2bd7c18083/materials-16-06673-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验