Kazak Magrur, Toz Akalin Tugba, Esen Fevzi
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Bahcesehir University School of Dental Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Therapeutic Dentistry, BAU International University School of Medicine and Health Science, Batumi, Georgia.
Eur J Dent. 2025 Feb;19(1):248-254. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1789270. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
This study aimed to investigate and compare water sorption and solubility properties of current restorative materials with different contents.
Alkasite, self-adhesive restorative material (Cention N, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein), bulk-fill glass hybrid restorative material (EQUIA Forte HT, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan), nanohybrid universal composite material (OptiShade, Kerr Dental, United States), and bulk-fill composite material (Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States) were used. Samples ( 6) were prepared (2 × 10 mm) according to the ISO 4049 standards. Water sorption and solubility values were calculated according to the ISO 4049 standards.
One-way ANOVA, Tukey's post-hoc, Tamhane's T2 post-hoc, Pearson's correlation, and independent samples -tests were used for statistical analysis ( 0.05).
Group EQUIA Forte HT significantly showed the highest water sorption values (57.278 ± 3.174), while Group Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative exhibited the lowest (4.429 ± 0.174; 0.05). The water sorption values for Group Cention N were 5.000 ± 0.542. Group EQUIA Forte HT significantly had the lowest water solubility values (-99.799 ± 1.909), while Group Cention N (-2.966 ± 0.402) significantly exhibited the highest ( 0.05). There was no significant correlation between water sorption and solubility values for each material ( 0.05).
The bulk-fill nano-filled composite resin material was successful in terms of water sorption while the bulk-fill glass hybrid restorative system in terms of water solubility. Alkasite can be recommended to be used as a base material due to its high solubility feature. Monomer, filler type, and amount had an impact on the water sorption and solubility properties of the tested materials.
本研究旨在调查和比较不同含量的现有修复材料的吸水性和溶解性。
使用了碱式玻璃离子水门汀、自粘接修复材料（Cention N，义获嘉伟瓦登特公司，沙恩，列支敦士登）、大块充填玻璃混合修复材料（EQUIA Forte HT，GC公司，东京，日本）、纳米混合通用复合材料（OptiShade，科尔牙科，美国）和大块充填复合材料（Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative，3M ESPE，圣保罗，明尼苏达州，美国）。根据ISO 4049标准制备样本（6个）（2×10毫米）。根据ISO 4049标准计算吸水性和溶解性值。
采用单因素方差分析、Tukey事后检验、Tamhane's T2事后检验、Pearson相关性分析和独立样本检验进行统计分析（P<0.05）。
EQUIA Forte HT组的吸水性值显著最高（57.278±3.174），而Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative组最低（4.429±0.174；P<0.05）。Cention N组的吸水性值为5.000±0.542。EQUIA Forte HT组的水溶性值显著最低（-99.799±1.909），而Cention N组（-2.966±0.402）显著最高（P<0.05）。每种材料的吸水性和溶解性值之间无显著相关性（P>0.05）。
大块充填纳米复合树脂材料在吸水性方面表现良好，而大块充填玻璃混合修复系统在水溶性方面表现良好。由于其高溶解性，碱式玻璃离子水门汀可推荐用作基底材料。单体、填料类型和用量对测试材料的吸水性和溶解性有影响。
