• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适用于泰国人群的痤疮严重程度分级自我评估系统的评估——一项试点研究。

Evaluation of an Acne Severity Grading Self-Assessment System Suitable for the Thai Population - A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Pakornphadungsit Kallapan, Harnchoowong Sarawin, Wattanakrai Penpun

机构信息

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Nov 3;16:3171-3179. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S427648. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/CCID.S427648
PMID:37941850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10629409/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient self-assessment is a potential tool in clinical practice to obtain subjective information of acne severity also in clinical trials to assess the general population in research and epidemiologic studies. The patient self-evaluation of acne severity has not yet been developed in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to validate an acne severity grading self-assessment suitable for the Thai population.

METHODS

A pilot study was conducted in 77 volunteers with acne lesions. We developed the Thai Global Evaluation Acne Scale (TGEA) and Thai Global Acne Grading System (TGAGS) by translating and adapting the original version. Patient self-assessment of acne severity was performed in two rounds. A training session about acne was provided to all participants lesions before starting the second round. Reliability between the self-assessment and clinician assessment of acne severity was statistically assessed.

RESULTS

For TGEA, 48.05% participants rated their acne severity corresponded with the clinicians (Cohen's kappa coefficient, kappa = 0.26). After receiving the training, 79.22% subjects responded their acne severity corresponded with the clinicians (kappa = 0.66). For TGAGS, 77.92% patients who answered their acne severity corresponded with the clinicians (kappa = 0.52). After receiving the training, 94.80% participants responded their acne severity corresponded with the clinicians (kappa = 0.89). For raw score of the TGAGS, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) during the self-assessment of acne severity compared to the clinician assessments was 0.54 and it increased to 0.79 after the training.

CONCLUSION

Due to the almost perfect reliability, we suggested that TGAGS is a reliable subjective self-assessment of acne severity suitable for the Thai population. The training is essential in enhancing the reliability of this instrument. Our study's findings can facilitate clinical practice and research studies.

摘要

背景

患者自我评估是临床实践中获取痤疮严重程度主观信息的潜在工具,在临床试验中也可用于评估研究和流行病学研究中的普通人群。泰国尚未开发出痤疮严重程度的患者自我评估方法。

目的

我们旨在验证一种适用于泰国人群的痤疮严重程度分级自我评估方法。

方法

对77名有痤疮皮损的志愿者进行了一项试点研究。我们通过翻译和改编原始版本,开发了泰国痤疮整体评估量表(TGEA)和泰国痤疮整体分级系统(TGAGS)。痤疮严重程度的患者自我评估分两轮进行。在第二轮开始前,为所有有皮损的参与者提供了一次关于痤疮的培训课程。对痤疮严重程度的自我评估与临床医生评估之间的可靠性进行了统计学评估。

结果

对于TGEA,48.05%的参与者对其痤疮严重程度的评分与临床医生的评分一致(科恩kappa系数,kappa = 0.26)。接受培训后,79.22%的受试者表示其痤疮严重程度与临床医生的评分一致(kappa = 0.66)。对于TGAGS,77.92%回答其痤疮严重程度的患者与临床医生的评分一致(kappa =

0.52)。接受培训后,94.80%的参与者表示其痤疮严重程度与临床医生的评分一致(kappa = 0.89)。对于TGAGS的原始评分,痤疮严重程度自我评估与临床医生评估之间的组内相关系数(ICC)为0.54,培训后增至0.79。

结论

由于几乎具有完美的可靠性,我们建议TGAGS是一种适用于泰国人群的可靠的痤疮严重程度主观自我评估方法。培训对于提高该工具的可靠性至关重要。我们研究的结果有助于临床实践和研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb56/10629409/8103816af18b/CCID-16-3171-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb56/10629409/8103816af18b/CCID-16-3171-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb56/10629409/8103816af18b/CCID-16-3171-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an Acne Severity Grading Self-Assessment System Suitable for the Thai Population - A Pilot Study.适用于泰国人群的痤疮严重程度分级自我评估系统的评估——一项试点研究。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Nov 3;16:3171-3179. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S427648. eCollection 2023.
2
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-powered acne grading system incorporating lesion identification.一种结合皮损识别的人工智能痤疮分级系统的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 6;10:1255704. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1255704. eCollection 2023.
3
Development and Initial Validation of a Multidimensional Acne Global Grading System Integrating Primary Lesions and Secondary Changes.多维痤疮全球分级系统的制定与初步验证:原发性皮损与继发性改变兼顾。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Mar 1;156(3):296-302. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4668.
4
Reliability of dermatologists in acne lesion counts and global assessments.
J Cutan Med Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;10(4):160-5. doi: 10.2310/7750.2006.00044.
5
Validation of the Spanish Acne Severity Scale (Escala de Gravedad del Acné Española--EGAE).验证西班牙痤疮严重程度评分(Escala de Gravedad del Acné Española--EGAE)。
Eur J Dermatol. 2013 Apr 1;23(2):233-40. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2013.2003.
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Patient-Rated Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire for Thai Patients.泰国患者版密歇根手部结果问卷的跨文化适应性、效度和信度
Occup Ther Int. 2018 Nov 18;2018:8319875. doi: 10.1155/2018/8319875. eCollection 2018.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Remote assessment of acne: the use of acne grading tools to evaluate digital skin images.痤疮的远程评估:使用痤疮分级工具评估数字皮肤图像。
Telemed J E Health. 2009 Jun;15(5):426-30. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0128.
9
The development and validation of an acne self-regulation inventory.痤疮自我调节量表的编制与验证
J Dermatol Sci. 2016 Nov;84(2):203-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
10
The validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Kujala score for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.针对髌股关节疼痛综合征患者的泰国版库亚拉评分的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Oct;38(21):2161-4. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1114035. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Skin Barrier Parameters in Acne Vulgaris versus Normal Controls: A Cross-Sectional Analytic Study.寻常痤疮与正常对照的皮肤屏障参数:一项横断面分析研究。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 Nov 1;17:2427-2436. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S476004. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Acne vulgaris and the most popular and new cosmetological treatments.寻常痤疮和最受欢迎的新型美容治疗方法。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Jul;22(7):1946-1950. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15757. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
2
Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Teledermatology Consultations at a Local Veterans Affairs Dermatology Clinic.评估当地退伍军人事务部皮肤科诊所远程皮肤病学会诊的诊断准确性。
Cureus. 2021 Jun 2;13(6):e15406. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15406. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Severity of Acne Vulgaris: Comparison of Two Assessment Methods.寻常痤疮的严重程度:两种评估方法的比较。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020 Sep 28;13:711-716. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S266320. eCollection 2020.
4
A Comprehensive Critique and Review of Published Measures of Acne Severity.已发表的痤疮严重程度测量方法的全面批判与综述
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016 Jul;9(7):40-52. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
5
A global perspective on the epidemiology of acne.痤疮的全球流行病学视角。
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Jul;172 Suppl 1:3-12. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13462.
6
Using the Physician Global Assessment in a clinical setting to measure and track patient outcomes.在临床环境中使用医师总体评估来衡量和跟踪患者的结果。
JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Apr;151(4):375-81. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3513.
7
Evaluation of essential clinical components and features of current acne global grading scales.评估当前痤疮全球分级量表的基本临床成分和特征。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Nov;69(5):754-761. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
8
Sensitivity and specificity of self-reported acne in 18-year-old adolescent males.18 岁青少年男性自述痤疮的敏感性和特异性。
Int J Dermatol. 2013 Aug;52(8):946-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05443.x. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
10
Statistical methods used to test for agreement of medical instruments measuring continuous variables in method comparison studies: a systematic review.用于检验医学仪器在方法比较研究中测量连续变量的一致性的统计方法:系统综述。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037908. Epub 2012 May 25.