Acciavatti Raymond J, Cohen Eric A, Maghsoudi Omid Haji, Gastounioti Aimilia, Pantalone Lauren, Hsieh Meng-Kang, Conant Emily F, Scott Christopher G, Winham Stacey J, Kerlikowske Karla, Vachon Celine, Maidment Andrew D A, Kontos Despina
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104.
Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester MN 55905.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Feb;11314. doi: 10.1117/12.2549163. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
Studies have shown that combining calculations of radiomic features with estimates of mammographic density results in an even better assessment of breast cancer risk than density alone. However, to ensure that risk assessment calculations are consistent across different imaging acquisition settings, it is important to identify features that are not overly sensitive to changes in these settings. In this study, digital mammography (DM) images of an anthropomorphic phantom ("Rachel", Gammex 169, Madison, WI) were acquired at various technique settings. We varied kV and mAs, which control contrast and noise, respectively. DM images in women with negative screening exams were also analyzed. Radiomic features were calculated in the raw ("FOR PROCESSING") DM images; i.e., grey-level histogram, co-occurrence, run length, fractal dimension, Gabor Wavelet, local binary pattern, Laws, and co-occurrence Laws features. For each feature, the range of variation across technique settings in phantom images was calculated. This range was scaled against the range of variation in the clinical distribution (specifically, the range corresponding to the middle 90% of the distribution). In order for a radiomic feature to be considered robust, this metric of imaging acquisition variation (IAV) should be as small as possible (approaching zero). An IAV threshold of 0.25 was proposed for the purpose of this study. Out of 341 features, 284 features (83%) met the threshold IAV ≤ 0.25. In conclusion, we have developed a method to identify robust radiomic features in DM.
研究表明,将放射组学特征计算与乳腺X线密度估计相结合,比单独使用密度能更好地评估乳腺癌风险。然而,为确保不同成像采集设置下的风险评估计算一致,识别对这些设置变化不过度敏感的特征很重要。在本研究中,在各种技术设置下采集了拟人化体模(“瑞秋”,Gammex 169,威斯康星州麦迪逊)的数字乳腺X线摄影(DM)图像。我们分别改变了控制对比度和噪声的千伏(kV)和毫安秒(mAs)。还分析了筛查结果为阴性的女性的DM图像。在原始(“用于处理”)DM图像中计算放射组学特征;即灰度直方图、共生矩阵、游程长度、分形维数、伽柏小波、局部二值模式、劳斯纹理以及共生劳斯纹理特征。对于每个特征,计算体模图像中不同技术设置下的变化范围。该范围相对于临床分布中的变化范围(具体而言,对应于分布中间90%的范围)进行缩放。为使放射组学特征被认为是稳健的,这种成像采集变化(IAV)指标应尽可能小(接近零)。本研究为此提出了IAV阈值为0.25。在341个特征中,284个特征(83%)满足IAV≤0.25的阈值。总之,我们开发了一种在DM中识别稳健放射组学特征的方法。