• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情商能力测试的计分挑战:一种使用原始项目分数对模型实质效应和方法效应进行验证性因素分析的方法。

The Scoring Challenge of Emotional Intelligence Ability Tests: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach to Model Substantive and Method Effects Using Raw Item Scores.

作者信息

Huyghe Veerle E I, Hovasapian Arpine, Fontaine Johnny R J

机构信息

Department of Work, Organization and Society, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:812525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812525. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812525
PMID:35360619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8960726/
Abstract

The internal structure of ability emotional intelligence (EI) tests at item level has been hardly studied, and if studied often the predicted structure did not show. In the present study, an model for responses to EI ability items using Likert response scales with a Situational Judgement Test (SJT) format is investigated with confirmatory factor analysis. The model consists of (1) a target EI ability factor, (2) an acquiescence factor, which is a method factor induced by the Likert response scales, and (3) design-based error covariances, which are induced by the SJT format. It is investigated whether this model can account for the observed associations between the raw item responses of the Components of Emotion Understanding Test-24 (CEUT-24). The CEUT-24 is a new test developed to assess emotion understanding, a key aspect of the EI ability construct, based on the componential emotion framework. The sample consisted of 1184 participants (15-22 years old) from four European countries (United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, and Spain) speaking four different languages (English, Dutch, German and Spanish). Findings showed that the model fitted the data well in all four languages. Furthermore, measurement invariance testing gave evidence for a well-fitting configural, metric, and partial scalar invariance model. The conclusion is that within a regular CFA framework using raw observed items responses, method factors (acquiescence response style and scenario induced variance) can be disentangled from the targeted EI ability factor.

摘要

能力型情商(EI)测试在项目层面的内部结构几乎未被研究过,即便有研究,通常预测的结构也未显现。在本研究中,使用情境判断测试(SJT)格式的李克特量表对EI能力项目的回答构建了一个模型,并通过验证性因素分析进行研究。该模型包括:(1)一个目标EI能力因素;(2)一个默认因素,这是由李克特量表引发的一种方法因素;(3)基于设计的误差协方差,这是由SJT格式引发的。研究了这个模型是否能够解释情绪理解测试-24(CEUT-24)各项目原始回答之间观察到的关联。CEUT-24是基于成分情绪框架开发的一项新测试,用于评估情绪理解,这是EI能力结构的一个关键方面。样本由来自四个欧洲国家(英国、比利时、德国和西班牙)的1184名参与者(15 - 22岁)组成,他们说四种不同的语言(英语、荷兰语、德语和西班牙语)。研究结果表明,该模型在所有四种语言中都能很好地拟合数据。此外,测量不变性检验为一个拟合良好的构型、度量和部分标量不变性模型提供了证据。结论是,在使用原始观察项目回答的常规验证性因素分析框架内,可以将方法因素(默认回答风格和情景引发的方差)与目标EI能力因素区分开来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/8960726/fbd3327a0029/fpsyg-13-812525-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/8960726/d5063962ee06/fpsyg-13-812525-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/8960726/1a2c28a3e884/fpsyg-13-812525-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/8960726/b75033e03337/fpsyg-13-812525-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/8960726/fbd3327a0029/fpsyg-13-812525-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/8960726/d5063962ee06/fpsyg-13-812525-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/8960726/1a2c28a3e884/fpsyg-13-812525-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/8960726/b75033e03337/fpsyg-13-812525-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e6/8960726/fbd3327a0029/fpsyg-13-812525-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Scoring Challenge of Emotional Intelligence Ability Tests: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach to Model Substantive and Method Effects Using Raw Item Scores.情商能力测试的计分挑战:一种使用原始项目分数对模型实质效应和方法效应进行验证性因素分析的方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:812525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812525. eCollection 2022.
2
Development of a psychological test to measure ability-based emotional intelligence in the Indonesian workplace using an item response theory.运用项目反应理论开发一种用于测量印度尼西亚职场中基于能力的情商的心理测试。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2017 Nov 28;10:339-352. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S143113. eCollection 2017.
3
Validity evidence for the situational judgment test paradigm in emotional intelligence measurement.情境判断测验范式在情绪智力测量中的有效性证据。
Int J Psychol. 2012;47(6):438-47. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.682063. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
4
The Geneva Emotional Competence Test (GECo): An ability measure of workplace emotional intelligence.日内瓦情绪能力测试(GECo):一种职场情绪智力的能力衡量工具。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Apr;104(4):559-580. doi: 10.1037/apl0000365. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
6
Embracing the Emotion in Emotional Intelligence Measurement: Insights from Emotion Theory and Research.在情商测量中接纳情感:来自情感理论与研究的见解
J Intell. 2023 Nov 1;11(11):210. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11110210.
7
QEPro: An ability measure of emotional intelligence for managers in a French cultural environment.QEPro:法国文化环境中管理者情商的一种能力度量。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(5):4080-4102. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01715-6. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
8
A componential emotion approach for the assessment of emotional awareness in youth.一种用于评估青少年情绪意识的成分情绪方法。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1416-1426. doi: 10.1037/pas0000261. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
9
Measurement of ability emotional intelligence: results for two new tests.情绪智力能力的测量:两个新测试的结果。
Br J Psychol. 2010 Aug;101(Pt 3):563-78. doi: 10.1348/000712609X474370. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
10
Invariance of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Construct Across Clinical Populations and Sociodemographic Variables.特质情绪智力结构在临床人群和社会人口学变量中的不变性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;13:796057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.796057. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Embracing the Emotion in Emotional Intelligence Measurement: Insights from Emotion Theory and Research.在情商测量中接纳情感:来自情感理论与研究的见解
J Intell. 2023 Nov 1;11(11):210. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11110210.

本文引用的文献

1
Promotion of mental health in young adults via mobile phone app: study protocol of the ECoWeB (emotional competence for well-being in Young adults) cohort multiple randomised trials.通过手机应用程序促进年轻人的心理健康:ECoWeB(年轻人幸福的情绪能力)队列多项随机试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02857-w.
2
International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist.国际测试委员会测试改编指南:标准检查表。
Psicothema. 2020 Aug;32(3):390-398. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.306.
3
Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.
用于研究李克特型评分量表中默许和极端反应方式的项目反应树模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):911-930. doi: 10.1177/0013164419829855. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
4
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.有序数据的验证性因子分析:稳健极大似然法与对角加权最小二乘法的比较
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):936-49. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.
5
Emotional intelligence is a second-stratum factor of intelligence: evidence from hierarchical and bifactor models.情绪智力是智力的二阶因素:来自层次和双因素模型的证据。
Emotion. 2014 Apr;14(2):358-374. doi: 10.1037/a0034755. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
6
Examining the structure of emotional intelligence at the item level: new perspectives, new conclusions.考察情绪智力在项目层面的结构:新视角,新结论。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(3):503-20. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.588690. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
7
The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis.在潜变量协方差结构分析中未能纳入设计驱动的相关残差的潜在影响。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Dec;12(4):381-398. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.381.
8
The world of emotions is not two-dimensional.情感世界并非二维的。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;18(12):1050-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x.
9
Assessing similarity between profiles.评估配置文件之间的相似性。
Psychol Bull. 1953 Nov;50(6):456-73. doi: 10.1037/h0057173.
10
Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0.使用梅耶-沙洛维-卡鲁索情商测验第二版(MSCEIT V2.0)测量情商。
Emotion. 2003 Mar;3(1):97-105. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.97.