Vijayashanker Aarathi, Aluvihare Varuna, Suddle Abid, Sanchez-Fueyo Alberto, Cerisuelo Miriam Cortes, Melendez Hector V, Jassem Wayel, Menon Krishna V, Heaton Nigel, Prachalias Andreas, Srinivasan Parthi
Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill SE59RS, England.
J Liver Transpl. 2023 Feb;9:100131. doi: 10.1016/j.liver.2022.100131. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
As the world recovers from the aftermath of devastating waves of an outbreak, the ongoing Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has presented a unique perspective to the transplantation community of ''organ utilisation'' in liver transplantation, a poorly defined term and ongoing hurdle in this field. To this end, we report the key metrics of transplantation activity from a high-volume liver transplantation centre in the United Kingdom over the past two years.
Between March 2019 and February 2021, details of donor liver offers received by our centre from National Health Service Blood & Transplant, and of transplantation were reviewed. Differences in the activity before and after the outbreak of the pandemic, including short term post-transplant survival, have been reported.
The pandemic year at our centre witnessed a higher utilisation of Donation after Cardiac Death livers (80.4% vs. 58.3%, = 0.016) with preserved United Kingdom donor liver indices and median donor age (2.12 vs. 2.02, = 0.638; 55 vs. 57 years, = 0.541) when compared to the pre-pandemic year. The 1- year patient survival rates for recipients in both the periods were comparable. The pandemic year, that was associated with increased utilisation of Donation after Cardiac Death livers, had an ischaemic cholangiopathy rate of 6%.
The pressures imposed by the pandemic led to increased utilisation of specific donor livers to meet patient needs and minimise the risk of death on the waiting list, with apparently preserved early post-transplant survival. Optimum organ utilisation is a balancing act between risk and benefit for the potential recipient, and technologies like machine perfusion may allow surgeons to increase utilisation without compromising patient outcomes.
随着世界从毁灭性疫情的余波中恢复,持续的2019冠状病毒病大流行给肝移植领域的“器官利用”这一移植界带来了独特视角,这是一个定义不明确且该领域一直存在的障碍。为此,我们报告了英国一家大型肝移植中心过去两年的移植活动关键指标。
回顾了2019年3月至2021年2月期间我们中心从英国国民医疗服务体系血液与移植部门收到的供肝信息以及移植详情。报告了疫情爆发前后活动的差异,包括移植后短期生存率。
与疫情前一年相比,我们中心在疫情期间心脏死亡后供肝的利用率更高(80.4%对58.3%,P = 0.016),英国供肝指数和供体年龄中位数保持不变(分别为2.12对2.02,P = 0.638;55岁对57岁,P = 0.541)。两个时期受者的1年生存率相当。与心脏死亡后供肝利用率增加相关的疫情期间,缺血性胆管病发生率为6%。
疫情带来的压力导致特定供肝的利用率提高,以满足患者需求并将等待名单上的死亡风险降至最低,且移植后早期生存率显然得以维持。最佳器官利用是潜在受者风险与获益之间的平衡行为,而机器灌注等技术可能使外科医生在不影响患者预后的情况下提高利用率。