• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SEIS-3的效度与信度:一种用于主观测量老年人力量的工具。

Validity and reliability of SEIS-3: An instrument for subjective measuring of strength in older adults.

作者信息

Sobral-Monteiro-Junior Renato, Coutinho Luciana Aparecida, Rodrigues Vinícius Dias, Machado Frederico Sander Mansur, Soares Wellington Danilo, Oliva Henrique Nunes Pereira, Bicalho Camila Cristina Fonseca

机构信息

Study and Research Group in Neuroscience, Exercise, Health and Sport (GENESEs), Physical Education Department, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran.

出版信息

MethodsX. 2023 Dec 4;12:102512. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102512. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2023.102512
PMID:38149291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10750096/
Abstract

The use of rating of perceived exertion (RPE) has grown substantially, providing a valuable alternative for exercise intensity monitoring, especially for older adults. However, some challenges, such as cross-cultural validity, age-related differences, and reliability issues, necessitate the development of a concise and user-friendly RPE instrument, particularly for strength training in this population. This study aimed to validate the Subjective Effort Induction Scale (SEIS-3), a simplified tool for measuring effort during strength training. SEIS-3 is a graded instrument with three exertion levels: 1) Light effort, 2) Moderate effort, and 3) Strong effort. Twenty seniors, aged 71±7 years, of both genders participated in the study (CEP/Unimontes 2,741,071/2018). We collected maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) data using a digital dynamometer. Subsequently, participants underwent the initial test, following the three SEIS-3 categories in a randomly assigned order of induced subjective effort. SEIS-3 instrument was evaluated by the approaches:•Linear regression analysis: employed to assess the validity of the instrument.•Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC): employed to assess the reliability of the instrument.SEIS-3 effort categories correlated with MIVC in both hands (R=0.80,  = 25.596, df=3,  < 0.01 for right hand; R=0.56,  = 9.132,  < 0.01 for left hand). Test-retest reliability for grip strength across effort categories was excellent (ICC > 0.9). SEIS-3 is a valid and reliable user-friendly tool for accurately assessing and regulating exercise intensity in older adults during strength tasks, benefiting their health, functional capacity, and overall quality of life. This low-cost instrument can help health professionals in their activities.

摘要

自觉用力程度(RPE)的使用已大幅增加,为运动强度监测提供了一种有价值的替代方法,特别是对于老年人。然而,一些挑战,如跨文化效度、年龄相关差异和可靠性问题,使得有必要开发一种简洁且用户友好的RPE工具,尤其是针对该人群的力量训练。本研究旨在验证主观用力诱导量表(SEIS-3),这是一种用于测量力量训练期间用力程度的简化工具。SEIS-3是一种分级工具,具有三个用力水平:1)轻度用力,2)中度用力,3)重度用力。20名年龄在71±7岁的老年人(男女均有)参与了该研究(CEP/Unimontes 2,741,071/2018)。我们使用数字测力计收集最大等长自愿收缩(MIVC)数据。随后,参与者按照随机分配的主观用力诱导顺序,遵循SEIS-3的三个类别进行初始测试。通过以下方法对SEIS-3工具进行评估:

•线性回归分析:用于评估该工具的效度。

•组内相关系数(ICC):用于评估该工具的可靠性。

SEIS-3的用力类别与双手的MIVC均相关(右手:R = 0.80, = 25.596,df = 3, < 0.01;左手:R = 0.56, = 9.132, < 0.01)。不同用力类别的握力重测信度极佳(ICC > 0.9)。SEIS-3是一种有效且可靠的用户友好工具,可在力量训练任务中准确评估和调节老年人的运动强度,有益于他们的健康、功能能力和整体生活质量。这种低成本工具可帮助健康专业人员开展工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d68f/10750096/b0d02762d4b4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d68f/10750096/97e510d78bdb/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d68f/10750096/b0d02762d4b4/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d68f/10750096/97e510d78bdb/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d68f/10750096/b0d02762d4b4/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of SEIS-3: An instrument for subjective measuring of strength in older adults.SEIS-3的效度与信度:一种用于主观测量老年人力量的工具。
MethodsX. 2023 Dec 4;12:102512. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102512. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Validity and Reliability of Facial Rating of Perceived Exertion Scales for Training Load Monitoring.面部感知用力评估量表在训练负荷监测中的有效性和可靠性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 May 1;37(5):e317-e324. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004361. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
Evaluation of the torque-velocity test of the BTE-Primus as a measure of sincerity of effort of grip strength.评估BTE-Primus扭矩-速度测试作为握力努力程度真实性衡量指标的情况。
J Hand Ther. 2007 Oct-Dec;20(4):326-34; quiz 335. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.07.009.
4
Validity and reliability of an instrumented leg-extension machine for measuring isometric muscle strength of the knee extensors.一种用于测量膝关节伸肌等长肌力的器械化腿部伸展机的效度和信度。
J Sport Rehabil. 2015 May 20;24(2). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0122. Print 2015 May 1.
5
Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children.儿童使用两种握力计的年龄特异性可靠性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1053-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00469.
6
Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the Jamar dynamometer.测量老年人的握力:握力球与贾马尔测力计的比较。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015 Jul-Sep;38(3):148-53. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000034.
7
Isometric hand grip strength measured by the Nintendo Wii Balance Board - a reliable new method.通过任天堂Wii平衡板测量的等长握力——一种可靠的新方法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 3;17:56. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0907-0.
8
Validity and reliability of a low-cost digital dynamometer for measuring isometric strength of lower limb.一种用于测量下肢等长肌力的低成本数字测力计的效度和信度
J Sports Sci. 2017 Nov;35(22):2179-2184. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1260152. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
9
Calf-raise senior: a new test for assessment of plantar flexor muscle strength in older adults: protocol, validity, and reliability.踮脚尖老年测试:一种评估老年人跖屈肌力量的新测试:方案、效度和信度
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Nov 15;11:1661-1674. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S115304. eCollection 2016.
10
Test-Retest Reliability of Rating of Perceived Exertion and Agreement With 1-Repetition Maximum in Adults.成人自感用力度评分的重测信度及与1次重复最大负荷量的一致性
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;46(9):768-74. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6498. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory.《神经性正食症量表中文版的跨文化适应及心理测量特性》
Front Nutr. 2025 Jan 23;11:1491544. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1491544. eCollection 2024.
2
The Mpox Vaccine Hesitancy Scale for Mpox: Links with Vaccination Intention among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Six Cities of China.用于猴痘的猴痘疫苗犹豫量表:中国六个城市男男性行为者的疫苗接种意愿关联
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;12(9):1009. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12091009.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the febrile convulsion knowledge scale for parents/caregivers: translation and validation study.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Physical Exercise on Cerebral Blood Velocity in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体育锻炼对老年人脑血流速度的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;13(10):847. doi: 10.3390/bs13100847.
2
Validity of Weekly and Monthly Perceived Exertion in Runners.跑者每周和每月感知用力的有效性。
Int J Sports Med. 2023 Oct;44(11):763-777. doi: 10.1055/a-2058-8049. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
3
Normative reference values of handgrip strength for Brazilian older people aged 65 to 90 years: Evidence from the multicenter Fibra‑BR study.
针对家长/照料者的中文版热性惊厥知识量表的心理测量学评估:翻译与验证研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 17;23(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02073-x.
4
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the oncology nurses health behaviors determinants scale: a cross-sectional study.中文版肿瘤护士健康行为决定因素量表的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 27;12:1349514. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1349514. eCollection 2024.
65 至 90 岁巴西老年人握力的参考值:来自多中心 Fibra-BR 研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0250925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250925. eCollection 2021.
4
The effect of dual-task training on cognition of people with different clinical conditions: An overview of systematic reviews.双重任务训练对不同临床状况人群认知的影响:系统评价概述
IBRO Rep. 2020 Jul 1;9:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ibror.2020.06.005. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Age-Related Differences in Perceived Exertion While Walking and Running Near the Preferred Transition Speed.在接近最佳转换速度时行走和跑步时的感知用力的年龄差异。
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2020 Sep 2;32(4):227-232. doi: 10.1123/pes.2019-0233.
6
Rate of Perceived Exertion and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Older Adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease.患有和未患有阿尔茨海默病的老年人的主观用力程度和心肺适能
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Feb 1;13(3):18-35. doi: 10.70252/ZDWC1398. eCollection 2020.
7
Competencies for rating perceived exertion in amateur soccer players with and without intellectual disabilities.评定有和无智力障碍业余足球运动员感知用力的能力。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Mar;33(2):248-257. doi: 10.1111/jar.12668. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
8
Ratings of Perceived Exertion Misclassify Intensities for Sedentary Older Adults During Graded Cycling Test: Effect of Supramaximal High-Intensity Interval Training.在分级自行车测试中,感知运动用力评级会错误分类久坐不动的老年人的运动强度:超最大强度间歇训练的影响。
Front Physiol. 2018 Oct 25;9:1505. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01505. eCollection 2018.
9
Validity of Session Rating Perceived Exertion Method for Quantifying Internal Training Load during High-Intensity Functional Training.高强度功能性训练期间用于量化内部训练负荷的会话感知用力评分法的有效性
Sports (Basel). 2018 Jul 23;6(3):68. doi: 10.3390/sports6030068.
10
Relationship between the rating of perceived exertion scale and the load intensity of resistance training.主观用力感觉量表评分与抗阻训练负荷强度之间的关系。
Strength Cond J. 2018 Apr;40(2):94-109. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000373.