Suppr超能文献

基于质谱的多组学优化:蛋白质、代谢物和脂质提取技术的比较分析

Optimizing MS-Based Multi-Omics: Comparative Analysis of Protein, Metabolite, and Lipid Extraction Techniques.

作者信息

Mok Jeong-Hun, Joo Minjoong, Cho Seonghyeon, Duong Van-An, Song Haneul, Park Jong-Moon, Lee Hookeun

机构信息

Department of Medical Device Management and Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, 115, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06355, Republic of Korea.

Basilbiotech, 157-20, Sinsong-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22002, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Metabolites. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):34. doi: 10.3390/metabo14010034.

Abstract

Multi-omics integrates diverse types of biological information from genomic, proteomic, and metabolomics experiments to achieve a comprehensive understanding of complex cellular mechanisms. However, this approach is also challenging due to technical issues such as limited sample quantities, the complexity of data pre-processing, and reproducibility concerns. Furthermore, existing studies have primarily focused on technical performance assessment and the presentation of modified protocols through quantitative comparisons of the identified protein counts. Nevertheless, the specific differences in these comparisons have been minimally investigated. Here, findings obtained from various omics approaches were profiled using various extraction methods (methanol extraction, the Folch method, and Matyash methods for metabolites and lipids) and two digestion methods (filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) and suspension traps (S-Trap)) for resuspended proteins. FASP was found to be more effective for the identification of membrane-related proteins, whereas S-Trap excelled in isolating nuclear-related and RNA-processing proteins. Thus, FASP may be suitable for investigating the immune response and bacterial infection pathways, whereas S-Trap may be more effective for studies focused on the mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, regarding the choice of extraction method, the single-phase method identified organic compounds and compounds related to fatty acids, whereas the two-phase extraction method identified more hydrophilic compounds such as nucleotides. Lipids with strong hydrophobicity, such as ChE and TG, were identified in the two-phase extraction results. These findings highlight that significant differences among small molecules are primarily identified due to the varying polarities of extraction solvents. These results, obtained by considering variables such as human error and batch effects in the sample preparation step, offer comprehensive and detailed results not previously provided by existing studies, thereby aiding in the selection of the most suitable pre-processing approach.

摘要

多组学整合了来自基因组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学实验的多种类型的生物信息,以全面了解复杂的细胞机制。然而,由于样本量有限、数据预处理的复杂性以及可重复性问题等技术问题,这种方法也具有挑战性。此外,现有研究主要集中在技术性能评估以及通过对已鉴定蛋白质数量的定量比较来呈现改进的方案。然而,这些比较中的具体差异很少被研究。在这里,使用各种提取方法(用于代谢物和脂质的甲醇提取法、福尔克法和马蒂亚什法)和两种消化方法(滤膜辅助样品制备(FASP)和悬浮阱(S-Trap))对重悬蛋白质,对从各种组学方法获得的结果进行了分析。发现FASP在鉴定膜相关蛋白方面更有效,而S-Trap在分离核相关蛋白和RNA加工蛋白方面表现出色。因此,FASP可能适用于研究免疫反应和细菌感染途径,而S-Trap可能对专注于神经退行性疾病机制的研究更有效。此外,关于提取方法的选择,单相法鉴定出有机化合物和与脂肪酸相关的化合物,而两相提取法鉴定出更多亲水性化合物,如核苷酸。在两相提取结果中鉴定出了具有强疏水性的脂质,如胆碱酯酶和甘油三酯。这些发现突出表明,小分子之间的显著差异主要是由于提取溶剂的极性不同而被识别出来的。这些通过考虑样品制备步骤中的人为误差和批次效应等变量而获得的结果,提供了现有研究以前未提供的全面而详细的结果,从而有助于选择最合适的预处理方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc2/10820684/dd40ec54106a/metabolites-14-00034-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验