Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Institute of Applied Social Sciences, Technical University of Applied Sciences, Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Tiepolostraße 6, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02430-5.
Symptom checker applications (SCAs) may help laypeople classify their symptoms and receive recommendations on medically appropriate actions. Further research is necessary to estimate the influence of user characteristics, attitudes and (e)health-related competencies.
The objective of this study is to identify meaningful predictors for SCA use considering user characteristics.
An explorative cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate German citizens' demographics, eHealth literacy, hypochondria, self-efficacy, and affinity for technology using German language-validated questionnaires. A total of 869 participants were eligible for inclusion in the study. As n = 67 SCA users were assessed and matched 1:1 with non-users, a sample of n = 134 participants were assessed in the main analysis. A four-step analysis was conducted involving explorative predictor selection, model comparisons, and parameter estimates for selected predictors, including sensitivity and post hoc analyses.
Hypochondria and self-efficacy were identified as meaningful predictors of SCA use. Hypochondria showed a consistent and significant effect across all analyses OR: 1.24-1.26 (95% CI: 1.1-1.4). Self-efficacy OR: 0.64-0.93 (95% CI: 0.3-1.4) showed inconsistent and nonsignificant results, leaving its role in SCA use unclear. Over half of the SCA users in our sample met the classification for hypochondria (cut-off on the WI of 5).
Hypochondria has emerged as a significant predictor of SCA use with a consistently stable effect, yet according to the literature, individuals with this trait may be less likely to benefit from SCA despite their greater likelihood of using it. These users could be further unsettled by risk-averse triage and unlikely but serious diagnosis suggestions.
The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00022465, DERR1- https://doi.org/10.2196/34026 .
症状检查应用程序 (SCA) 可以帮助非专业人士对其症状进行分类,并获得有关适当医疗措施的建议。需要进一步研究以评估用户特征、态度和(e)健康相关能力的影响。
本研究旨在确定考虑用户特征的 SCA 使用的有意义预测因素。
采用探索性横断面调查,使用德语验证问卷调查德国公民的人口统计学、电子健康素养、疑病症、自我效能感和对技术的亲和力。共有 869 名符合条件的参与者纳入研究。由于 n = 67 名 SCA 用户被评估并与非用户 1:1 匹配,因此在主要分析中评估了 n = 134 名参与者。进行了四步分析,包括探索性预测因素选择、模型比较和选定预测因素的参数估计,包括敏感性和事后分析。
疑病症和自我效能感被确定为 SCA 使用的有意义预测因素。疑病症在所有分析中均显示出一致且显著的影响 OR:1.24-1.26(95%CI:1.1-1.4)。自我效能感 OR:0.64-0.93(95%CI:0.3-1.4)显示出不一致且无统计学意义的结果,其在 SCA 使用中的作用尚不清楚。我们样本中的一半以上的 SCA 用户符合 WI 上的疑病症分类(5 分)。
疑病症已成为 SCA 使用的重要预测因素,其影响具有一致性和稳定性,但根据文献,尽管这些个体更有可能使用 SCA,但他们可能不太可能从中受益。这些用户可能会因风险规避分诊和不太可能但严重的诊断建议而感到不安。
该研究在德国临床试验注册处(DRKS)DRKS00022465,DERR1- https://doi.org/10.2196/34026 进行了注册。