• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同制定药物研发患者参与质量指南:一项国际多利益相关方倡议。

Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: an international multistakeholder initiative.

作者信息

Deane Katherine, Delbecque Laure, Gorbenko Oleksandr, Hamoir Anne Marie, Hoos Anton, Nafria Begonya, Pakarinen Chi, Sargeant Ify, Richards Dawn P, Skovlund Soren Eik, Brooke Nicholas

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Patient Reported Outcomes, Pharmerit International, Rotterdam, Belgium.

出版信息

BMJ Innov. 2019 Jan;5(1):43-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000317. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000317
PMID:31645992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6792320/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Meaningful patient engagement (PE) can enhance medicines' development. However, the current PE landscape is fragmentary and lacking comprehensive guidance.

METHODS

We systematically searched for PE initiatives (SYNaPsE database/publications). Multistakeholder groups integrated these with their own PE expertise to co-create draft PE Quality Guidance which was evaluated by public consultation. Projects exemplifying good PE practice were identified and assessed against PE Quality Criteria to create a Book of Good Practices (BOGP).

RESULTS

Seventy-six participants from 51 organisations participated in nine multistakeholder meetings (2016-2018). A shortlist of 20relevant PE initiatives (from 170 screened) were identified. The co-created INVOLVE guidelines provided the main framework for PE Quality Guidance and was enriched with the analysis of the PE initiatives and the PE expertise of stakeholders. Seven key PE Quality Criteria were identified. Public consultation yielded 67 responses from diverse backgrounds. The PE Quality Guidance was agreed to be useful for achieving quality PE in practice, understandable, easy to use, and comprehensive. Overall, eight initiatives from the shortlist and from meeting participants were selected for inclusion in the BOGP based on demonstration of PE Quality Criteria and willingness of initiative owners to collaborate.

DISCUSSION

The PE Quality Guidance and BOGP are practical resources which will be continually updated in response to user feedback. They are not prescriptive, but rather based on core principles, which can be applied according to the unique needs of each interaction and initiative. Implementation of the guidance will facilitate improved and systematic PE across the medicines' development lifecycle.

摘要

引言

有意义的患者参与(PE)可以促进药物研发。然而,当前的患者参与情况零散,缺乏全面的指导。

方法

我们系统地搜索了患者参与计划(SYNaPsE数据库/出版物)。多利益相关方团体将这些计划与自身的患者参与专业知识相结合,共同制定患者参与质量指导草案,并通过公众咨询进行评估。确定了体现良好患者参与实践的项目,并根据患者参与质量标准进行评估,以创建一本良好实践手册(BOGP)。

结果

来自51个组织的76名参与者参加了9次多利益相关方会议(2016 - 2018年)。从170个筛选的计划中确定了20个相关患者参与计划的入围名单。共同创建的INVOLVE指南为患者参与质量指导提供了主要框架,并通过对患者参与计划和利益相关方的患者参与专业知识的分析得到了丰富。确定了七个关键的患者参与质量标准。公众咨询收到了来自不同背景的67份回复。大家一致认为患者参与质量指导对于在实践中实现高质量的患者参与是有用的、易于理解的、便于使用的且全面的。总体而言,根据患者参与质量标准的展示以及计划所有者的合作意愿,从入围名单和会议参与者中挑选了八个计划纳入良好实践手册。

讨论

患者参与质量指导和良好实践手册是实用资源,将根据用户反馈不断更新。它们不是规定性的,而是基于核心原则,可以根据每次互动和计划的独特需求进行应用。该指导的实施将有助于在药物开发生命周期中改善和系统地开展患者参与。

相似文献

1
Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: an international multistakeholder initiative.共同制定药物研发患者参与质量指南:一项国际多利益相关方倡议。
BMJ Innov. 2019 Jan;5(1):43-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000317. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
2
Co-creation of practical "how-to guides" for patient engagement in key phases of medicines development-from theory to implementation.共同创建实用的“操作指南”,以促进患者在药物研发关键阶段的参与——从理论到实践。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Aug 23;7(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00294-x.
3
A practical 'How-To' Guide to plain language summaries (PLS) of peer-reviewed scientific publications: results of a multi-stakeholder initiative utilizing co-creation methodology.同行评审科学出版物简明语言摘要(PLS)实用“操作指南”:采用共同创作方法的多方利益相关者倡议结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 2;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00358-6.
4
Co-creation of the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator: a multi-stakeholder initiative to ensure the patient voice is represented in health decision-making.全球患者体验数据导航器的共同创建:一项多利益相关方倡议,以确保患者的声音在健康决策中得到体现。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00503-9.
5
Sustaining Meaningful Patient Engagement Across the Lifecycle of Medicines: A Roadmap for Action.贯穿药品全生命周期的有意义的患者参与:行动路线图。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):936-953. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00282-z. Epub 2021 May 10.
6
What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?利益相关者对患者参与有哪些期望:这些期望得到满足了吗?
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1035-1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
7
Valuing patient engagement: Reflexive learning in evidence generation practices for health technology assessment.重视患者参与:健康技术评估证据生成实践中的反思性学习。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;280:114048. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114048. Epub 2021 May 21.
8
Optimising Multi-stakeholder Practices in Patient Engagement: A Gap Analysis to Enable Focused Evolution of Patient Engagement in the Development and Lifecycle Management of Medicines.优化多方利益相关者在患者参与方面的实践:差距分析,以促进在药品开发和生命周期管理中患者参与的重点演进。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Nov;55(6):1165-1179. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00313-9. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Protocol for the development of guidance for stakeholder engagement in health and healthcare guideline development and implementation.卫生与医疗保健指南制定和实施中利益相关者参与指南制定的指导方针制定议定书。
Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 1;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating Patient Needs and Perspectives in Additional Risk Minimization Measures and Other Pharmacovigilance Deliverables - A Framework and Implementation Roadmap.将患者需求和观点纳入额外的风险最小化措施及其他药物警戒工作成果——一个框架和实施路线图
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00844-5.
2
Developing an Inclusive Dance Guide for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Co-Design Process and Initial Feasibility Study.为脑瘫儿童制定包容性舞蹈指南:一个共同设计过程和初步可行性研究
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70304. doi: 10.1111/hex.70304.
3
Grey literature scoping review: a synthesis of the application of participatory methodologies in underrepresented groups at an elevated risk of dementia.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Patient Involvement in Medicines Research and Development:: A Practical Roadmap.提高患者在药物研发中的参与度:一份实用路线图。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Sep;51(5):612-619. doi: 10.1177/2168479017706405. Epub 2017 May 8.
2
The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review.已发表试验中患者参与的患病率:一项系统评价。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 May 22;4:17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0099-x. eCollection 2018.
3
Assessing the Financial Value of Patient Engagement: A Quantitative Approach from CTTI's Patient Groups and Clinical Trials Project.
灰色文献综述:参与式方法在痴呆症高风险代表性不足群体中的应用综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 May 3;25(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02577-3.
4
Frameworks Used to Engage Postsecondary Students in Campus Mental Health Research: A Scoping Review.用于促使高等院校学生参与校园心理健康研究的框架:一项范围综述
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70144. doi: 10.1111/hex.70144.
5
Co-creating tools for embedding meaningful patient and public involvement and engagement in real-world data and evidence research in the pharmaceutical industry setting: a multistakeholder participatory co-design study.共同创建工具,以在制药行业环境中切实将患者和公众参与及融入真实世界数据与证据研究:一项多利益相关方参与式协同设计研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 17;15(2):e088914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088914.
6
Patient partner engagement in the publication process: challenges and possible solutions.患者伴侣参与出版过程:挑战与可能的解决方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 15;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02495-4.
7
Enhancing Care Coordination in Oncology and Nononcology Thoracic Surgery Care Pathways Through a Digital Health Solution: Mixed Methods Study.通过数字化健康解决方案提高肿瘤学和非肿瘤学胸外科护理路径中的护理协调:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 26;8:e60222. doi: 10.2196/60222.
8
Embedding patient engagement in the R&D process of a life sciences company through co-creation with a patient expert R&D board: a case study.通过与患者专家研发委员会共同创造,将患者参与融入生命科学公司的研发过程:一项案例研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Nov 6;10(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00631-w.
9
Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in the Development of a Platform Clinical Trial for Parkinson's Disease: An Evaluation Protocol.患者和公众参与帕金森病平台临床试验的开发:评估方案。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(4):809-821. doi: 10.3233/JPD-230444.
10
Patient organisations' views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research: a pilot study in Portugal.患者组织对患者参与癌症研究的看法、动机和经验:葡萄牙的一项试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):e077444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077444.
评估患者参与的财务价值:来自CTTI患者群体与临床试验项目的定量方法。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):220-229. doi: 10.1177/2168479017716715. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
The Rules of Engagement: CTTI Recommendations for Successful Collaborations Between Sponsors and Patient Groups Around Clinical Trials.参与规则:CTTI 关于申办方与患者群体围绕临床试验开展成功合作的建议
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):206-213. doi: 10.1177/2168479017720247. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.临床试验招募规划:来自临床试验转型倡议的一个拟议框架
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Mar;66:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
6
A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials - a work in progress.一个用于有意义且灵活参与临床试验的患者和公众参与(PPI)工具包——正在进行中的工作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 27;2:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8. eCollection 2016.
7
From tokenism to meaningful engagement: best practices in patient involvement in an EU project.从表面文章到有意义的参与:患者参与欧盟项目的最佳实践
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jun 25;1:5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0004-9. eCollection 2015.
8
Patients', clinicians' and the research communities' priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch.患者、临床医生和研究团体在治疗研究方面的优先事项:存在重大不匹配。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jun 25;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0003-x. eCollection 2015.
9
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
10
Making Patient Engagement a Reality.实现患者参与。
Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0264-6.