From the Department of Radiological Sciences (E.T., S.K., M.M. J.P., H.Z., C.W.A., B.Y., M.L., B.S., L.L., C.K., R.J., G.D., K.N.), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Neurology (J.L.S., D.S.L.), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 May 9;45(5):562-567. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8170.
The DWI-FLAIR mismatch is used to determine thrombolytic eligibility in patients with acute ischemic stroke when the time since stroke onset is unknown. Commercial software packages have been developed for automated DWI-FLAIR classification. We aimed to use e-Stroke software for automated classification of the DWI-FLAIR mismatch in a cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke and in a comparative analysis with 2 expert neuroradiologists.
In this retrospective study, patients with acute ischemic stroke who had MR imaging and known time since stroke onset were included. The DWI-FLAIR mismatch was evaluated by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to the time since stroke onset and automatically by the e-Stroke software. After 4 weeks, the neuroradiologists re-evaluated the MR images, this time equipped with automated predicted e-Stroke results as a computer-assisted tool. Diagnostic performances of e-Stroke software and the neuroradiologists were evaluated for prediction of DWI-FLAIR mismatch status.
A total of 157 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 82 patients (52%) had a time since stroke onset of ≤4.5 hours. By means of consensus reads, 81 patients (51.5%) had a DWI-FLAIR mismatch. The diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve/sensitivity/specificity) of e-Stroke software for the determination of the DWI-FLAIR mismatch was 0.72/90.0/53.9. The diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve/sensitivity/specificity) for neuroradiologists 1 and 2 was 0.76/69.1/84.2 and 0.82/91.4/73.7, respectively; both significantly (< .05) improved to 0.83/79.0/86.8 and 0.89/92.6/85.5, respectively, following the use of e-Stroke predictions as a computer-assisted tool. The interrater agreement (κ) for determination of DWI-FLAIR status was improved from 0.49 to 0.57 following the use of the computer-assisted tool.
This automated quantitative approach for DWI-FLAIR mismatch provides results comparable with those of human experts and can improve the diagnostic accuracies of expert neuroradiologists in the determination of DWI-FLAIR status.
当卒中发病时间未知时,DWI-FLAIR 不匹配可用于确定急性缺血性卒中患者的溶栓适应证。目前已有商用软件包用于 DWI-FLAIR 的自动分类。本研究旨在使用 e-Stroke 软件对急性缺血性卒中患者的 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配进行自动分类,并与 2 位神经放射学专家的结果进行对比分析。
本回顾性研究纳入了已知发病时间的急性缺血性卒中患者。2 位神经放射学专家在不了解发病时间的情况下对 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配进行评估,并由 e-Stroke 软件自动评估。4 周后,神经放射学专家再次评估 MRI 图像,此时配备有自动预测的 e-Stroke 结果作为计算机辅助工具。评估 e-Stroke 软件和神经放射学专家对 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配状态的预测性能。
共纳入 157 例患者。82 例(52%)患者的发病时间≤4.5 小时。通过共识读片,81 例(51.5%)患者存在 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配。e-Stroke 软件确定 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配的诊断准确性(曲线下面积/敏感度/特异性)为 0.72/90.0/53.9。神经放射学专家 1 和 2 的诊断准确性(曲线下面积/敏感度/特异性)分别为 0.76/69.1/84.2 和 0.82/91.4/73.7,使用 e-Stroke 预测作为计算机辅助工具后,分别显著提高至 0.83/79.0/86.8 和 0.89/92.6/85.5(均<.05)。使用计算机辅助工具后,DWI-FLAIR 状态的观察者间一致性(κ)从 0.49 提高至 0.57。
这种用于 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配的自动定量方法与人类专家的结果相当,并可提高神经放射学专家对 DWI-FLAIR 状态判断的诊断准确性。