Chen Hui, Li Junshi, Zuo Jianfeng, Zhang Xiping
Hui Chen, Department of Anesthesiology, Changxing County People's Hospital, Changxing Country, Huzhou 313100, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China.
Junshi Li, Department of Anesthesiology, Changxing County People's Hospital, Changxing Country, Huzhou 313100, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China.
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(3Part-II):415-420. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.3.8284.
To compare the analgesic effects and incidence of postoperative adverse events after the erector spine plane (ESP) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
In this retrospective observational study, clinical data of 103 patients undergoing LC in Changxing County People's Hospital from October 2020 to October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and the patients were divided into ESP-group (n=56) and TAP-group (n=57) based on the block method. The operation time, the change of visual analogue scale (VAS) score of static (sVAS) and dynamic (dVAS) pain after operation, the patient-controlled dose, and the remedial analgesic dose at 24 hours after the operation were compared between the two groups. The occurrence of postoperative adverse reactions in both groups was recorded.
The dVAS scores of the ESP-group at one hour, three hours, six hours, and 12 hours after the operation were lower than those of the TAP-group (<0.05). The patient-controlled dose and remedial analgesia dose of the ESP-group were significantly lower than those of the TAP-group (<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups (>0.05).
ESP block and TAP block in LC patients have similar operation time and incidence of postoperative adverse events such as nausea and vomiting. However, short-term postoperative analgesic effect of ESP block is superior to TAP and requires a lower dose of analgesia.
比较竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞和腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者的镇痛效果及术后不良事件发生率。
在这项回顾性观察研究中,回顾性分析了2020年10月至2022年10月在长兴县人民医院接受LC的103例患者的临床资料,并根据阻滞方法将患者分为ESP组(n = 56)和TAP组(n = 57)。比较两组的手术时间、术后静态(sVAS)和动态(dVAS)疼痛视觉模拟量表评分的变化、患者自控剂量以及术后24小时的补救镇痛剂量。记录两组术后不良反应的发生情况。
ESP组术后1小时、3小时、6小时和12小时的dVAS评分低于TAP组(<0.05)。ESP组的患者自控剂量和补救镇痛剂量显著低于TAP组(<0.05)。两组术后恶心呕吐发生率无差异(>0.05)。
LC患者的ESP阻滞和TAP阻滞在手术时间以及恶心呕吐等术后不良事件发生率方面相似。然而,ESP阻滞的术后短期镇痛效果优于TAP阻滞,且所需镇痛剂量更低。