1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center.
Mount Sinai Medical Center.
Neuropsychology. 2019 Jul;33(5):670-684. doi: 10.1037/neu0000542. Epub 2019 May 9.
This research aimed to determine whether qualitative analysis of different types of intrusion errors on a verbal cognitive task was useful in detecting subtle cognitive impairment in preclinical stages prior to the progression to dementia.
Different types of semantic intrusions on the Loewenstein-Acevedo Scales of Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L) were compared across 160 individuals diagnosed as cognitively normal (CN), amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI), and dementia. The sample included Hispanics and non-Hispanic European Americans.
Across diagnostic groups, the most common type of intrusion error was actual targets presented from a competing word list under conditions eliciting proactive semantic interference (PSI), and retroactive semantic interference (RSI), followed by intrusions that represented one of three overlapping semantic categories but none of the targets from List A or B. Nonsemantic intrusions rarely occurred. These competing list intrusions (CLI) and semantically related intrusions (SRI) differentiated between aMCI and CN participants. Further, these intrusion error were related to brain amyloid load, indicating their importance as potential primary markers of AD-related neurodegeneration. Ethnicity effects were not seen across the types of intrusion errors.
Two types of intrusion errors (CLI and SRI) showed differences between the CN and aMCI group, with the aMCI group evidencing a higher rate of these intrusion errors compared with the CN group. These results support previous literature about the LASSI-L's sensitivity at the earliest stages of abnormal aging. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究旨在确定在认知障碍前阶段(即发展为痴呆症之前),对言语认知任务中的不同类型的侵入性错误进行定性分析,是否有助于检测到细微的认知障碍。
在 160 名被诊断为认知正常(CN)、遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)和痴呆症的个体中,比较了 Loewenstein-Acevedo 语义干扰和学习量表(LASSI-L)上的不同类型语义侵入。该样本包括西班牙裔和非西班牙裔欧洲裔美国人。
在整个诊断组中,最常见的侵入性错误类型是在引发前摄性语义干扰(PSI)和回溯性语义干扰(RSI)的情况下,从竞争词列表中呈现的实际目标,其次是代表三个重叠语义类别之一但均不属于 A 或 B 列表中的目标的侵入。非语义性侵入很少发生。这些竞争列表侵入(CLI)和语义相关侵入(SRI)区分了 aMCI 和 CN 参与者。此外,这些侵入性错误与脑淀粉样蛋白负荷有关,表明它们作为 AD 相关神经退行性变的潜在主要标志物的重要性。在各种侵入性错误类型中没有观察到种族效应。
两种类型的侵入性错误(CLI 和 SRI)在 CN 和 aMCI 组之间存在差异,与 CN 组相比,aMCI 组的这些侵入性错误发生率更高。这些结果支持了关于 LASSI-L 在异常老化的最早阶段的敏感性的先前文献。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。