Levy Deborah F, Entrup Jillian L, Schneck Sarah M, Onuscheck Caitlin F, Rahman Maysaa, Kasdan Anna, Casilio Marianne, Willey Emma, Davis L Taylor, de Riesthal Michael, Kirshner Howard S, Wilson Stephen M
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Brain Commun. 2024 Feb 1;6(1):fcae024. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae024. eCollection 2024.
Individuals with post-stroke aphasia tend to recover their language to some extent; however, it remains challenging to reliably predict the nature and extent of recovery that will occur in the long term. The aim of this study was to quantitatively predict language outcomes in the first year of recovery from aphasia across multiple domains of language and at multiple timepoints post-stroke. We recruited 217 patients with aphasia following acute left hemisphere ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke and evaluated their speech and language function using the Quick Aphasia Battery acutely and then acquired longitudinal follow-up data at up to three timepoints post-stroke: 1 month ( = 102), 3 months ( = 98) and 1 year ( = 74). We used support vector regression to predict language outcomes at each timepoint using acute clinical imaging data, demographic variables and initial aphasia severity as input. We found that ∼60% of the variance in long-term (1 year) aphasia severity could be predicted using these models, with detailed information about lesion location importantly contributing to these predictions. Predictions at the 1- and 3-month timepoints were somewhat less accurate based on lesion location alone, but reached comparable accuracy to predictions at the 1-year timepoint when initial aphasia severity was included in the models. Specific subdomains of language besides overall severity were predicted with varying but often similar degrees of accuracy. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of using support vector regression models with leave-one-out cross-validation to make personalized predictions about long-term recovery from aphasia and provide a valuable neuroanatomical baseline upon which to build future models incorporating information beyond neuroanatomical and demographic predictors.
中风后失语症患者往往会在一定程度上恢复语言能力;然而,可靠地预测长期恢复的性质和程度仍然具有挑战性。本研究的目的是定量预测失语症恢复第一年中多个语言领域以及中风后多个时间点的语言结果。我们招募了217例急性左半球缺血性或出血性中风后失语症患者,急性期使用快速失语症量表评估他们的言语和语言功能,然后在中风后的三个时间点进行纵向随访:1个月(n = 102)、3个月(n = 98)和1年(n = 74)。我们使用支持向量回归,将急性临床影像数据、人口统计学变量和初始失语症严重程度作为输入,来预测每个时间点的语言结果。我们发现,使用这些模型可以预测约60%的长期(1年)失语症严重程度的方差,病变位置的详细信息对这些预测有重要贡献。仅基于病变位置,1个月和3个月时间点的预测准确性稍低,但当模型中纳入初始失语症严重程度时,其准确性与1年时间点的预测相当。除了总体严重程度外,语言的特定子领域也能以不同但通常相似的准确度进行预测。我们的研究结果表明,使用留一法交叉验证的支持向量回归模型对失语症长期恢复进行个性化预测是可行的,并提供了一个有价值的神经解剖学基线,在此基础上可以构建未来纳入神经解剖学和人口统计学预测因素之外信息的模型。