• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威女性与癌症(NOWAC)研究中自我评估健康状况与死亡率之间的关联。

Associations Between Self-Rated Health and Mortality in the Norwegian Women and Cancer (NOWAC) Study.

作者信息

Killie Ida Løken, Braaten Tonje, Lorem Geir Fagerjord, Borch Kristin Benjaminsen

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 20;16:109-120. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S433965. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S433965
PMID:38404707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10893877/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We investigated the association between self-rated health (SRH) and cancer incidence and SRH and all-cause mortality among Norwegian women.

POPULATION AND METHODS

We used data from 110,104 women in the Norwegian Women and Cancer (NOWAC) cohort aged 41-70 years at baseline. We used flexible parametric survival analysis with restricted cubic splines to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between SRH and mortality in the entire cohort. We employed the same method in a multistate design to assess associations between baseline SRH and 1) cancer incidence, and 2) all-cause mortality in subgroups of women who did and did not receive a cancer diagnosis during follow-up.

RESULTS

With very good SRH as reference category for all associations and median age at end of follow-up, lower SRH was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.26) and HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.66-1.97). Lower SRH at baseline was associated with cancer incidence (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20 and HR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.32-1.58). Poor baseline SRH was associated with increased mortality for women who received a cancer diagnosis (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04-1.39), and SRH showed a strong association with increased mortality for women who stayed cancer free (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.44-1.77 and HR 3.34, 95% CI 2.91-3.84).

CONCLUSION

Lower SRH at baseline predicted increased cancer risk and all-cause mortality in middle-aged to older women. Poor SRH at baseline predicted all-cause mortality in women who later received a cancer diagnosis. Both good and poor SRH at baseline predicted all-cause mortality in women who stayed cancer-free, and the association was stronger for these women compared to both the entire cohort and to women who were subsequently diagnosed with cancer.

摘要

目的

我们研究了挪威女性自我评估健康状况(SRH)与癌症发病率以及SRH与全因死亡率之间的关联。

人群与方法

我们使用了挪威女性与癌症(NOWAC)队列中110104名基线年龄在41至70岁之间的女性的数据。我们采用带有受限立方样条的灵活参数生存分析来计算整个队列中SRH与死亡率之间关联的风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。我们在多状态设计中采用相同方法来评估基线SRH与以下两者之间的关联:1)癌症发病率,以及2)在随访期间接受或未接受癌症诊断的女性亚组中的全因死亡率。

结果

以所有关联的“非常好的SRH”作为参考类别以及随访结束时的中位年龄,较低的SRH与死亡率增加相关(HR 1.19,95% CI 1.12 - 1.26)以及HR 1.81,95% CI 1.66 - 1.97)。基线时较低的SRH与癌症发病率相关(HR 1.14,95% CI 1.08 - 1.20以及HR 1.44,95% CI:1.32 - 1.58)。基线SRH较差与接受癌症诊断的女性死亡率增加相关(HR 1.20,95% CI 1.04 - 1.39),并且SRH与未患癌症的女性死亡率增加有很强的关联(HR 1.59,95% CI 1.44 - 1.77以及HR 3.34,95% CI 2.91 - 3.84)。

结论

基线时较低的SRH预示中年至老年女性患癌风险和全因死亡率增加。基线时较差的SRH预示后来接受癌症诊断的女性的全因死亡率。基线时良好和较差的SRH都预示未患癌症的女性的全因死亡率,并且与整个队列以及随后被诊断患有癌症的女性相比,这些女性的这种关联更强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/7a6926f15e28/CLEP-16-109-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/9387321cf84b/CLEP-16-109-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/69fa9775c459/CLEP-16-109-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/acc9f1ea4dfc/CLEP-16-109-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/9089aab03bbe/CLEP-16-109-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/7a6926f15e28/CLEP-16-109-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/9387321cf84b/CLEP-16-109-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/69fa9775c459/CLEP-16-109-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/acc9f1ea4dfc/CLEP-16-109-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/9089aab03bbe/CLEP-16-109-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8213/10893877/7a6926f15e28/CLEP-16-109-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Associations Between Self-Rated Health and Mortality in the Norwegian Women and Cancer (NOWAC) Study.挪威女性与癌症(NOWAC)研究中自我评估健康状况与死亡率之间的关联。
Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 20;16:109-120. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S433965. eCollection 2024.
2
Lifecourse correlates of self-rated health and associations with subsequent mortality: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study.自评健康的生命历程关联及其与后续死亡率的关系:来自赫特福德郡队列研究的结果。
J Med Surg Public Health. 2024 Apr;2:None. doi: 10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100085.
3
The ability of self-rated health to predict mortality among community-dwelling elderly individuals differs according to the specific cause of death: data from the NEDICES cohort.自感健康状况预测社区居住的老年个体死亡的能力因具体死因而异:来自 NEDICES 队列的数据。
Gerontology. 2013;59(4):368-77. doi: 10.1159/000348781. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
4
Gender differences in the effect of self-rated health (SRH) on all-cause mortality and specific causes of mortality among individuals aged 50 years and older.50 岁及以上人群中,自评健康状况对全因死亡率和特定死因死亡率的影响存在性别差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 4;14(12):e0225732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225732. eCollection 2019.
5
Black-white difference in long-term predictive power of self-rated health on all-cause mortality in United States.美国自评健康对全因死亡率长期预测能力的黑白差异。
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;26(2):106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
6
Self-rated health and its association with all-cause mortality of older adults in Poland: The PolSenior project.自评健康及其与波兰老年人全因死亡率的关系:PolSenior 项目。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Nov-Dec;79:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
7
Self-Rated Health Status and Risk of Incident Stroke in 0.5 Million Chinese Adults: The China Kadoorie Biobank Study.50万中国成年人的自评健康状况与中风发病风险:中国嘉道理生物样本库研究
J Stroke. 2018 May;20(2):247-257. doi: 10.5853/jos.2017.01732. Epub 2018 May 31.
8
Association between a self-rated health question and mortality in young and old dialysis patients: a cohort study.一项自评健康问题与年轻及老年透析患者死亡率之间的关联:队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jul;52(1):111-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 May 29.
9
Self-rated health (SRH) in young people and causes of death and mortality in young adulthood. A prospective registry-based Norwegian HUNT-study.年轻人的自评健康状况(SRH)以及青年期的死亡原因和死亡率。一项基于前瞻性登记处的挪威HUNT研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jan 23;7:100364. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100364. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Coffee consumption and overall and cause-specific mortality: the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC).咖啡消费与全因和特定原因死亡率:挪威妇女与癌症研究(NOWAC)。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;35(10):913-924. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00664-x. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediagnostic self-rated health and survival in women diagnosed with cancer in the Norwegian Women and Health Study: a prospective cohort study.挪威女性与健康研究中癌症确诊女性的诊断前自评健康状况与生存情况:一项前瞻性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e099992. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099992.
2
Intrinsic health as a foundation for a science of health.内在健康是健康科学的基础。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jun 20;11(25):eadu8437. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu8437. Epub 2025 Jun 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-reported health status and mortality from all-causes of death, cardiovascular disease and cancer in an older adult population in Spain.在西班牙老年人群中,自我报告的健康状况与全因死亡率、心血管疾病和癌症死亡率之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0261782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261782. eCollection 2022.
2
Cross-classification between self-rated health and health status: longitudinal analyses of all-cause mortality and leading causes of death in the UK.自评健康与健康状况的交叉分类:英国全因死亡率和主要死因的纵向分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04016-x.
3
Quitting Smoking At or Around Diagnosis Improves the Overall Survival of Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
确诊时或确诊前后戒烟可提高肺癌患者的总生存率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2022 May;17(5):623-636. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.12.005. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
4
Association of Obesity With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肥胖与癌症患者生存结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e213520. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3520.
5
Optimising weight-loss interventions in cancer patients-A systematic review and network meta-analysis.优化癌症患者的减肥干预措施:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0245794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245794. eCollection 2021.
6
Self-reported health and survival in older patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma.老年多发性骨髓瘤患者的自我报告健康状况和生存情况。
Cancer Causes Control. 2020 Jul;31(7):641-650. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01305-0. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
7
The association between life satisfaction, vitality, self-rated health, and risk of cancer.生活满意度、活力、自评健康与癌症风险之间的关联。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):947-954. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2083-1. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
8
Parametric multistate survival models: Flexible modelling allowing transition-specific distributions with application to estimating clinically useful measures of effect differences.参数多状态生存模型:灵活建模,允许特定转移分布,并应用于估计具有临床意义的效应差异度量。
Stat Med. 2017 Dec 20;36(29):4719-4742. doi: 10.1002/sim.7448. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
9
Self-rated health and all-cause and cause-specific mortality of older adults: Individual data meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies in the CHANCES Consortium.老年人的自评健康状况与全因死亡率及特定病因死亡率:CHANCES联盟前瞻性队列研究的个体数据荟萃分析
Maturitas. 2017 Sep;103:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
10
Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package 'dagitty'.使用有向无环图进行稳健的因果推断:R包“dagitty”
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 1;45(6):1887-1894. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw341.