Ghosh Arnab K, Azan Alexander, Basu Gaurab, Bernstein Joanna, Gillespie Elizabeth, Gordon Lesley B, Krishnamurthy Sudarshan, LeFrancois Darlene, Marcus Erin N, Tejani Mehul, Townley Theresa, Rimler Eva, Whelan Heather
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1ST Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2581-2589. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08690-1. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
Building expertise in climate and planetary health among healthcare professionals cannot come with greater urgency as the threats from climate change become increasingly apparent. Current and future healthcare professionals-particularly internists-will increasingly need to understand the interconnectedness of natural systems and human health to better serve their patients longitudinally. Despite this, few national medical societies and accreditation bodies espouse frameworks for climate change and planetary health-related education at the undergraduate (UME), graduate (GME), and continuing (CME) medical education level. As a community of medical educators with an enduring interest in climate change and planetary health, the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) recognizes the need to explicitly define structured educational opportunities and core competencies in both UME and GME as well as pathways for faculty development. In this position statement, we build from the related SGIM Climate and Health position statement, and review and synthesize existing position statements made by US-based medical societies and accreditation bodies that focus on climate change and planetary health-related medical education, identify gaps using Bloom's Hierarchy, and provide recommendations on behalf of SGIM regarding the development of climate and planetary health curricula development. Identified gaps include (1) limited systematic approach to climate and planetary health medical education at all levels; (2) minimal emphasis on learner-driven approaches; (3) limited focus on physician and learner well-being; and (4) limited role for health equity and climate justice. Recommendations include a call to relevant accreditation bodies to explicitly include climate change and planetary health as a competency, extend the structural competency framework to climate change and planetary health to build climate justice, proactively include learners in curricular development and teaching, and ensure resources and support to design and implement climate and planetary health-focused education that includes well-being and resiliency.
随着气候变化带来的威胁日益明显,培养医疗保健专业人员在气候与地球健康方面的专业知识已变得刻不容缓。当前及未来的医疗保健专业人员,尤其是内科医生,将越来越需要理解自然系统与人类健康的相互联系,以便更好地为患者提供长期服务。尽管如此,很少有国家医学协会和认证机构支持在本科医学教育(UME)、研究生医学教育(GME)和继续医学教育(CME)层面开展与气候变化和地球健康相关的教育框架。作为一个对气候变化和地球健康有着持久兴趣的医学教育工作者团体,普通内科医学协会(SGIM)认识到有必要明确界定UME和GME中的结构化教育机会和核心能力,以及教师发展的途径。在本立场声明中,我们以SGIM相关的气候与健康立场声明为基础,回顾并综合了美国医学协会和认证机构发表的现有立场声明,这些声明聚焦于与气候变化和地球健康相关的医学教育,运用布鲁姆分类法找出差距,并代表SGIM就气候与地球健康课程开发提出建议。已确定的差距包括:(1)各级气候与地球健康医学教育缺乏系统方法;(2)对以学习者为驱动的方法重视不足;(3)对医生和学习者福祉的关注有限;(4)健康公平和气候正义的作用有限。建议包括呼吁相关认证机构明确将气候变化和地球健康作为一项能力,将结构能力框架扩展到气候变化和地球健康以建立气候正义,积极让学习者参与课程开发和教学,并确保提供资源和支持,以设计和实施以气候与地球健康为重点、包括福祉和复原力的教育。