Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bioversity International, Montpellier, France.
Nat Food. 2024 Mar;5(3):211-220. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-00926-x. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
Trade-off analysis (TOA) is central to policy and decision-making aimed at promoting sustainable agricultural landscapes. Yet, a generic methodological framework to assess trade-offs in agriculture is absent, largely due to the wide range of research disciplines and objectives for which TOA is used. In this study, we systematically reviewed 119 studies that have implemented TOAs in landscapes and regions dominated by agricultural systems around the world. Our results highlight that TOAs tend to be unbalanced, with a strong emphasis on productivity rather than environmental and socio-cultural services. TOAs have mostly been performed at farm or regional scales, rarely considering multiple spatial scales simultaneously. Mostly, TOAs fail to include stakeholders at study development stage, disregard recommendation uncertainty due to outcome variability and overlook risks associated with the TOA outcomes. Increased attention to these aspects is critical for TOAs to guide agricultural landscapes towards sustainability.
权衡分析(TOA)是旨在促进可持续农业景观的政策和决策的核心。然而,由于用于 TOA 的研究学科和目标范围广泛,因此缺乏评估农业权衡的通用方法框架。在这项研究中,我们系统地回顾了 119 项在世界各地以农业系统为主导的景观和地区实施 TOA 的研究。我们的研究结果表明,TOA 往往不平衡,对生产力的重视程度超过了对环境和社会文化服务的重视程度。TOA 主要在农场或地区尺度上进行,很少同时考虑多个空间尺度。大多数情况下,TOA 未能在研究开发阶段纳入利益相关者,忽视了由于结果变异性而导致的建议不确定性,也忽略了与 TOA 结果相关的风险。更多地关注这些方面对于 TOA 指导农业景观实现可持续性至关重要。