From the Department of Radiology (W.S., H.L., H.X.), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine (D.X.), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Apr 8;45(4):461-467. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8150.
Due to high chemical shift displacement, challenges emerge at ultra-high fields when measuring metabolites using H-MRS. Our goal was to investigate how well the high SNR and high bandwidth spin-echo (HISE) technique perform at 5T for detecting target metabolites in brain tumors.
Twenty-six subjects suspected of having brain tumors were enrolled. HISE and point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) single-voxel spectroscopy scans were collected with a 5T clinical scanner with an intermediate TE (TE = 144 ms). The main metabolites, including total NAA, Cr, and total Cho, were accessed and compared between HISE and PRESS using a paired Student test, with full width at half maximum and SNR as covariates. The detection rate of specific metabolites, including lactate, alanine, and lipid, and subjective spectral quality were accessed and compared between HISE and PRESS.
Twenty-three pathologically confirmed brain tumors were included. Only the full width at half maximum for total NAA was significantly lower with HISE than with PRESS (< .05). HISE showed a significantly higher SNR for total NAA, Cr, and total Cho compared with PRESS (< .05). Lactate was detected in 21 of the 23 cases using HISE, but in only 4 cases using PRESS. HISE detected alanine in 8 of 9 meningiomas, whereas PRESS detected alanine in just 3 meningiomas. PRESS found lipid in more cases than HISE, while HISE outperformed PRESS in terms of subjective spectral quality.
HISE outperformed the clinical standard PRESS technique in detecting target metabolites of brain tumors at 5T, particularly lactate and alanine.
由于化学位移位移较高,在使用 H-MRS 测量代谢物时,超高场会出现挑战。我们的目标是研究在 5T 下高 SNR 和高带宽自旋回波(HISE)技术在检测脑肿瘤靶代谢物方面的表现。
共纳入 26 例疑似脑肿瘤患者。使用具有中间 TE(TE=144ms)的 5T 临床扫描仪采集 HISE 和点分辨波谱(PRESS)单体波谱扫描。使用配对学生 t 检验比较 HISE 和 PRESS 之间的主要代谢物,包括总 NAA、Cr 和总 Cho,并使用全宽半最大值和 SNR 作为协变量。评估了 HISE 和 PRESS 之间特定代谢物(包括乳酸、丙氨酸和脂质)的检测率和主观光谱质量。
共纳入 23 例经病理证实的脑肿瘤患者。仅总 NAA 的全宽半最大值 HISE 显著低于 PRESS(<0.05)。与 PRESS 相比,HISE 显示总 NAA、Cr 和总 Cho 的 SNR 显著更高(<0.05)。使用 HISE 在 23 例中的 21 例中检测到乳酸,但仅在 4 例中使用 PRESS 检测到乳酸。HISE 在 9 例脑膜瘤中的 8 例中检测到丙氨酸,而 PRESS 仅在 3 例脑膜瘤中检测到丙氨酸。PRESS 发现脂质的病例多于 HISE,而 HISE 在主观光谱质量方面优于 PRESS。
在 5T 下,HISE 比临床标准 PRESS 技术在检测脑肿瘤的靶代谢物方面表现更好,尤其是乳酸和丙氨酸。