Taylor Zachary, Henken-Siefken Austin, McCague Andrew
Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific - Northwest, Western University of Health Sciences, Lebanon, USA.
General Surgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 6;16(2):e53730. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53730. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Investigating patterns among the outcomes of patients involved in motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) can provide information necessary to guide targeted interventions to improve road traffic safety. Our purpose is to identify any differences between passenger and driver injury severity and overall clinical course after MVAs.
We performed a retrospective review and analysis of 3,693 patients involved in MVAs from 2016 to 2021. We divided the data into two groups, drivers and passengers, and compared the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS) on admission, days in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), length of hospital stay (LOS), post Emergency Department (ED) disposition, discharge (DC) disposition, and signs of life on arrival (SOLA) to the ED. We compared mean ISS, New Injury Severity Score (NISS), RTS, length in ICU and LOS using a student's T-test and SOLA, post-ED and DC disposition using Chi-square analysis.
We did not find any statistically significant difference in ISS, RTS, days in ICU, LOS, or SOLA between the drivers and passengers. However, we did find a statistically significant difference in the post-ED (X= 113.743, p=<0.0001) and DC disposition (X=41.172, p=<0.0001) of drivers and passengers. After the ED and DC, more passengers were transferred to a higher level of care than expected, while the inverse was true for drivers. The number of drivers discharged to Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) was also higher than expected, further contributing to the observed difference in DC disposition. Conclusion: Our study found no statistically significant difference between driver and passenger injury severity, length of hospital stay, days in ICU, and SOLA after an MVA. The clinical courses of the two groups were found to be significantly different based on post-ED and DC disposition data. We identified limitations, such as a relatively small sample size and insufficient data on specific car seat locations for passengers, underscoring the need for a more nuanced exploration. Future research must broaden its scope to encompass diverse crash scenarios, vehicle design and safety technologies, seat belt dynamics, and age- and gender-specific vulnerabilities.
研究机动车事故(MVA)患者的预后模式可为指导针对性干预措施以改善道路交通安全提供必要信息。我们的目的是确定MVA后乘客和驾驶员的损伤严重程度及总体临床病程之间的差异。
我们对2016年至2021年期间参与MVA的3693例患者进行了回顾性审查和分析。我们将数据分为两组,即驾驶员和乘客,并比较了损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、入院时的修订创伤评分(RTS)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院天数、住院时间(LOS)、急诊科(ED)后的处置、出院(DC)处置以及到达ED时的生命体征(SOLA)。我们使用学生t检验比较平均ISS、新损伤严重程度评分(NISS)、RTS、ICU住院时间和LOS,并使用卡方分析比较SOLA、ED后和DC处置情况。
我们未发现驾驶员和乘客在ISS、RTS、ICU住院天数、LOS或SOLA方面存在任何统计学上的显著差异。然而,我们确实发现驾驶员和乘客在ED后(X = 113.743,p = <0.0001)和DC处置(X = 41.172,p = <0.0001)方面存在统计学上的显著差异。在ED和DC之后,更多乘客被转至比预期更高水平的护理机构,而驾驶员的情况则相反。出院至熟练护理设施(SNFs)的驾驶员数量也高于预期,这进一步导致了观察到的DC处置差异。结论:我们的研究发现,MVA后驾驶员和乘客的损伤严重程度、住院时间、ICU住院天数和SOLA之间无统计学上的显著差异。根据ED后和DC处置数据,发现两组的临床病程存在显著差异。我们确定了一些局限性,如样本量相对较小以及乘客特定汽车座椅位置的数据不足,这突出了进行更细致探索的必要性。未来的研究必须扩大其范围,以涵盖各种碰撞场景、车辆设计和安全技术、安全带动态以及特定年龄和性别的脆弱性。