Schraiber Joshua G, Edge Michael D
Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2911.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 19;121(12):e2319496121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319496121. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
Without the ability to control or randomize environments (or genotypes), it is difficult to determine the degree to which observed phenotypic differences between two groups of individuals are due to genetic vs. environmental differences. However, some have suggested that these concerns may be limited to pathological cases, and methods have appeared that seem to give-directly or indirectly-some support to claims that aggregate heritable variation within groups can be related to heritable variation among groups. We consider three families of approaches: the "between-group heritability" sometimes invoked in behavior genetics, the statistic [Formula: see text] used in empirical work in evolutionary quantitative genetics, and methods based on variation in ancestry in an admixed population, used in anthropological and statistical genetics. We take up these examples to show mathematically that information on within-group genetic and phenotypic information in the aggregate cannot separate among-group differences into genetic and environmental components, and we provide simulation results that support our claims. We discuss these results in terms of the long-running debate on this topic.
由于无法控制或随机化环境(或基因型),很难确定两组个体之间观察到的表型差异在多大程度上是由基因差异还是环境差异导致的。然而,有人认为这些问题可能仅限于病理情况,并且已经出现了一些方法,这些方法似乎直接或间接地为以下观点提供了一些支持:群体内部的总体遗传变异可以与群体之间的遗传变异相关。我们考虑三类方法:行为遗传学中有时会用到的“组间遗传力”、进化数量遗传学实证研究中使用的统计量[公式:见正文],以及人类学和统计遗传学中基于混合群体中祖先差异的方法。我们通过这些例子从数学上表明,总体上群体内部的遗传和表型信息无法将群体间差异区分为遗传和环境成分,并且我们提供的模拟结果支持了我们的观点。我们根据关于这个主题的长期争论来讨论这些结果。