Wang Hsin-Yao, Lin Wan-Ying, Zhou Chenfei, Yang Zih-Ang, Kalpana Sriram, Lebowitz Michael S
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33343, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;16(5):862. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050862.
The concept and policies of multicancer early detection (MCED) have gained significant attention from governments worldwide in recent years. In the era of burgeoning artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the integration of MCED with AI has become a prevailing trend, giving rise to a plethora of MCED AI products. However, due to the heterogeneity of both the detection targets and the AI technologies, the overall diversity of MCED AI products remains considerable. The types of detection targets encompass protein biomarkers, cell-free DNA, or combinations of these biomarkers. In the development of AI models, different model training approaches are employed, including datasets of case-control studies or real-world cancer screening datasets. Various validation techniques, such as cross-validation, location-wise validation, and time-wise validation, are used. All of the factors show significant impacts on the predictive efficacy of MCED AIs. After the completion of AI model development, deploying the MCED AIs in clinical practice presents numerous challenges, including presenting the predictive reports, identifying the potential locations and types of tumors, and addressing cancer-related information, such as clinical follow-up and treatment. This study reviews several mature MCED AI products currently available in the market, detecting their composing factors from serum biomarker detection, MCED AI training/validation, and the clinical application. This review illuminates the challenges encountered by existing MCED AI products across these stages, offering insights into the continued development and obstacles within the field of MCED AI.
近年来,多癌早期检测(MCED)的概念和政策已引起全球各国政府的高度关注。在人工智能(AI)技术蓬勃发展的时代,MCED与AI的融合已成为一种普遍趋势,催生出大量的MCED AI产品。然而,由于检测目标和AI技术的异质性,MCED AI产品的整体多样性仍然相当大。检测目标的类型包括蛋白质生物标志物、游离DNA或这些生物标志物的组合。在AI模型的开发中,采用了不同的模型训练方法,包括病例对照研究数据集或真实世界癌症筛查数据集。使用了各种验证技术,如交叉验证、位置验证和时间验证。所有这些因素都对MCED AI的预测效果产生重大影响。在AI模型开发完成后,将MCED AI应用于临床实践面临诸多挑战,包括呈现预测报告、确定肿瘤的潜在位置和类型,以及处理与癌症相关的信息,如临床随访和治疗。本研究回顾了目前市场上几种成熟的MCED AI产品,从血清生物标志物检测、MCED AI训练/验证以及临床应用等方面分析其构成因素。这篇综述阐明了现有MCED AI产品在这些阶段所面临的挑战,为MCED AI领域的持续发展和障碍提供了见解。