• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自 43 个国家的证据表明,疾病在短期内不会改变文化。

Evidence from 43 countries that disease leaves cultures unchanged in the short-term.

机构信息

Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33155-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-33155-6
PMID:38499528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10948757/
Abstract

Did cultures change shortly after, and in response to, the COVID-19 outbreak? If so, then in what way? We study these questions for a set of macro-cultural dimensions: collectivism/individualism, duty/joy, traditionalism/autonomy, and pro-fertility/individual-choice norms. We also study specific perceptions and norms like perceived threats to society (e.g. immigration) and hygiene norms. We draw on Evolutionary Modernization Theory, Parasite Stress Theory, and the Behavioural Immune System, and existing evidence, to make an overarching prediction: the COVID-19 pandemic should increase collectivism, duty, traditionalism, conformity (i.e. pro-fertility), and outgroup prejudice. We derive specific hypotheses from this prediction and use survey data from 29,761 respondents, in 55 cities and 43 countries, collected before (April-December 2019) and recently after the emergence of COVID-19 (April-June 2020) to test them. We exploit variation in disease intensity across regions to test potential mechanisms behind any changes. The macro-cultural dimensions remained stable. In contrast, specific perceptions and norms related to the pandemic changed: norms of hygiene substantially increased as did perceived threats related to disease. Taken together, our findings imply that macro-cultural dimensions are primarily stable while specific perceptions and norms, particularly those related to the pandemic, can change rapidly. Our findings provide new evidence for theories of cultural change and have implications for policy, public health, daily life, and future trajectories of our societies.

摘要

文化是否在 COVID-19 爆发后不久发生了变化?如果是,那么变化的方式是什么?我们研究了一系列宏观文化维度:集体主义/个人主义、责任/快乐、传统主义/自主性以及亲生育/个人选择规范。我们还研究了特定的观念和规范,如对社会的感知威胁(如移民)和卫生规范。我们借鉴了进化现代化理论、寄生虫压力理论和行为免疫系统以及现有证据,提出了一个总体预测:COVID-19 大流行应该会增加集体主义、责任感、传统主义、从众性(即亲生育)和对外群体的偏见。我们从这个预测中得出了具体的假设,并使用了来自 29761 名受访者的调查数据,这些受访者来自 55 个城市和 43 个国家,收集时间分别在 COVID-19 爆发前(2019 年 4 月至 12 月)和最近(2020 年 4 月至 6 月),以检验这些假设。我们利用疾病在不同地区的严重程度差异来检验任何变化背后的潜在机制。宏观文化维度保持稳定。相比之下,与大流行相关的特定观念和规范发生了变化:卫生规范大幅增加,与疾病相关的感知威胁也有所增加。总的来说,我们的发现意味着宏观文化维度主要是稳定的,而特定的观念和规范,特别是与大流行相关的观念和规范,可能会迅速变化。我们的发现为文化变化理论提供了新的证据,并对政策、公共卫生、日常生活以及我们社会的未来轨迹产生了影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1508/10948757/a2b4da1d6811/41598_2023_33155_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1508/10948757/a2b4da1d6811/41598_2023_33155_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1508/10948757/a2b4da1d6811/41598_2023_33155_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence from 43 countries that disease leaves cultures unchanged in the short-term.来自 43 个国家的证据表明,疾病在短期内不会改变文化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;14(1):6502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33155-6.
2
Changes in social norms during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic across 43 countries.COVID-19 大流行早期 43 个国家社会规范的变化。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 16;15(1):1436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44999-5.
3
Beyond the surface: accounting for confounders in understanding the link between collectivism and COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.超越表面:在理解集体主义与美国 COVID-19 大流行之间的联系时,需要考虑混杂因素。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):1513. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16384-2.
4
Of Germs and Culture; Parasite Stress as the Origin of Individualism-Collectivism.论病菌与文化;寄生虫压力作为个人主义-集体主义的起源
Evol Psychol Sci. 2023;9(1):82-89. doi: 10.1007/s40806-022-00335-y. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
5
Cultural tightness-looseness and normative social influence in eight Asian countries: Associations of individual and collective norms with vaccination intentions.文化紧密度和规范性社会影响在八个亚洲国家:个体和集体规范与疫苗接种意愿的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116431. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116431. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
6
Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan.文化是否变得越来越个人主义?对美国和日本个人主义-集体主义的跨时间比较。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 Feb;16(1):3-24. doi: 10.1177/1088868311411587. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
7
Assessing the effects of pandemic risk on cooperation and social norms using a before-after Covid-19 comparison in two long-term experiments.使用新冠疫情前后对比的方法,在两项长期实验中评估大流行风险对合作和社会规范的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 9;14(1):3356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53427-z.
8
People's political views, perceived social norms, and individualism shape their privacy concerns for and acceptance of pandemic control measures that use individual-level georeferenced data.人们的政治观点、感知到的社会规范和个人主义,塑造了他们对使用个人层面地理位置数据的疫情防控措施的隐私关注和接受程度。
Int J Health Geogr. 2023 Dec 6;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12942-023-00354-3.
9
The impact of pandemic mental cognition on cultural values: an empirical study based on social media.大流行心理认知对文化价值观的影响:基于社交媒体的实证研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;23(1):1069. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16006-x.
10
Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals, coping and emotions.患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对生育诊所关闭的体验:评估、应对和情绪。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2556-2566. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa218.

引用本文的文献

1
Ecological Threats and Cultural Systems : Epidemics and Natural Disasters Do Not Predict Collectivism.生态威胁与文化体系:流行病和自然灾害无法预测集体主义。
Hum Nat. 2024 Dec;35(4):382-396. doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09480-8. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in social norms during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic across 43 countries.COVID-19 大流行早期 43 个国家社会规范的变化。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 16;15(1):1436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44999-5.
2
Pandemic threat and group cohesion: national identification in the wake of COVID-19 is associated with authoritarianism.大流行威胁和群体凝聚力:新冠疫情后,国家认同与威权主义有关。
J Soc Psychol. 2023 Nov 2;163(6):789-805. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.2024122. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
3
Shifts in ecology, behavior, values, and relationships during the coronavirus pandemic: Survival threat, subsistence activities, conservation of resources, and interdependent families.
新冠疫情期间生态、行为、价值观及人际关系的转变:生存威胁、生计活动、资源保护与相互依存的家庭
Curr Res Ecol Soc Psychol. 2021;2:100017. doi: 10.1016/j.cresp.2021.100017. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Global Behaviors, Perceptions, and the Emergence of Social Norms at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.全球行为、认知以及新冠疫情初期社会规范的出现。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2022 Jan;193:473-496. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
5
Evidence from a long-term experiment that collective risks change social norms and promote cooperation.长期实验证据表明,集体风险会改变社会规范并促进合作。
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 15;12(1):5452. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25734-w.
6
The Advent of the COVID-19 Epidemic Did Not Affect Americans' Endorsement of Moral Foundations.新冠疫情的出现并未影响美国人对道德基础的认同。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 28;12:647858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647858. eCollection 2021.
7
Moral dilemmas and trust in leaders during a global health crisis.全球卫生危机期间的道德困境和对领导者的信任。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):1074-1088. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01156-y. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
8
Measuring Cultural Dimensions: External Validity and Internal Consistency of Hofstede's VSM 2013 Scales.衡量文化维度:霍夫斯泰德2013年价值观调查量表的外部效度与内部一致性
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 6;12:662604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662604. eCollection 2021.
9
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
10
Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies.57 个社会对规范违反应采取何种适当回应的看法。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 5;12(1):1481. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9.