Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Molecular Microbiology and Immunology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Apr 10;62(4):e0152823. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01528-23. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
Although the Vitek 2 system is broadly used for antifungal susceptibility testing of spp., its performance against has been assessed using limited number of isolates recovered from restricted geographic areas. We therefore compared Vitek 2 system with the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method using an international collection of 100 . isolates belonging to different clades. The agreement ±1 twofold dilution between the two methods and the categorical agreement (CA) based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) tentative resistance breakpoints and Vitek 2-specific wild-type upper limit values (WT-ULVs) were determined. The CLSI-Vitek 2 agreement was poor for 5-flucytosine (0%), fluconazole (16%), and amphotericin B (29%), and moderate for voriconazole (61%), micafungin (67%), and caspofungin (81%). Significant interpretation errors were recorded using the CDC breakpoints for amphotericin B (31% CA, 69% major errors; MaEs) and fluconazole (69% CA, 31% very major errors; VmEs), but not for echinocandins (99% CA, 1% MaEs for both micafungin and caspofungin) for which the Vitek 2 allowed correct categorization of echinocandin-resistant mutant isolates. Discrepancies were reduced when the Vitek 2 WT-ULV of 16 mg/L for amphotericin B (98% CA, 2% MaEs) and of 4 mg/L for fluconazole (96% CA, 1% MaEs, 3% VmEs) were used. In conclusion, the Vitek 2 system performed well for echinocandin susceptibility testing of . Resistance to fluconazole was underestimated whereas resistance to amphotericin B was overestimated using the CDC breakpoints of ≥32 and ≥2 mg/L, respectively. Vitek 2 minimun inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >4 mg/L indicated resistance to fluconazole and Vitek 2 MICs ≤16 mg/L indicated non-resistance to amphotericin B.
虽然 Vitek 2 系统广泛用于 spp. 的抗真菌药敏试验,但针对 的性能仅通过从有限地理区域中恢复的少数分离物进行了评估。因此,我们使用国际 100 株 分离株的集合,比较了 Vitek 2 系统与参考临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)肉汤微量稀释法。这些分离株属于不同的进化枝。两种方法之间的 ±1 倍稀释差异和基于疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)暂定耐药折点和 Vitek 2 特定野生型上限值(WT-ULV)的分类学一致(CA)确定。CLSI-Vitek 2 对 5-氟胞嘧啶(0%)、氟康唑(16%)和两性霉素 B(29%)的一致性较差,对伏立康唑(61%)、米卡芬净(67%)和卡泊芬净(81%)的一致性为中度。使用两性霉素 B(31%CA,69%主要错误;MaE)和氟康唑(69%CA,31%非常大错误;VmE)的 CDC 折点记录了明显的解释错误,但对于棘白菌素类药物则没有(两性霉素 B 和氟康唑的 CA 均为 99%,均为 1%的 MaE),因为 Vitek 2 允许正确分类棘白菌素类耐药 的突变体分离株。当使用两性霉素 B 的 Vitek 2 WT-ULV 为 16 mg/L(98%CA,2%MaE)和氟康唑的 4 mg/L(96%CA,1%MaE,3%VmE)时,差异减少。总之,Vitek 2 系统对棘白菌素类药敏试验表现良好。使用 CDC 的≥32 和≥2 mg/L 折点时,氟康唑的耐药性被低估,而两性霉素 B 的耐药性被高估。Vitek 2 最小抑菌浓度(MIC)>4 mg/L 表明对氟康唑的耐药性,Vitek 2 MIC≤16 mg/L 表明对两性霉素 B 的非耐药性。