• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中央型腰椎管狭窄减压术后的恢复模式:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。

Recovery pattern after decompression of central lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational cohort study.

机构信息

Departments of Clinical Sciences and Orthopaedics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Department of Orthopaedics, Varberg Hospital, Träslövsvägen 68, 432 37, Varberg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Mar 25;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04614-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-04614-1
PMID:38528550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10962069/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Detailed preoperative information is associated with superior outcomes. We aimed to describe the recovery pattern after decompression of central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS).

METHODS

50 patients aged 51-85 years who underwent decompression without fusion due to CLSS were followed from before to after surgery (post-op day 1, 7, and 14). Back and leg pain were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 = no pain 0, 10 = worst pain) and quality of life using the EuroQol-5D index (0 = death, 1 = best), and EQ-5D-visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 = worst, 100 = best).

RESULTS

NRS leg pain was reduced from preoperative to first postoperative day by 5.2 (6.1, 4.3) (mean (95%CI)], and NRS back pain from postoperative day 1-7 by 0.6 (1.2, 0.03) and from day 7 to 14 by 0.7 (1.3, 0.2)]. In contrast, EQ-5D index increased from preoperative to first postoperative day by 0.09 (0.06, 0.13) and from day 1 to 7 by 0.05 (0.02,0.08), and EQ-5D VAS from preoperative to first postoperative day by 13.7 (9.1, 18.3) and from day 1 to 7 by 6.0 (2.0, 10.0). After two weeks, 51% of the patients had improved above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in back pain and 71% in leg pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients scheduled for decompression due to CLSS should be informed that improvement in leg pain and quality of life in general can be expected within one day of surgery, that quality of life improves a little further in the first postoperative week, and that back pain improves in the first 2 postoperative weeks. In most patients, decompression without fusion due to CLSS seems to achieve clinically relevant improvement within 2 weeks.

摘要

背景

详细的术前信息与更好的结果相关。我们旨在描述中央腰椎椎管狭窄症(CLSS)减压后的恢复模式。

方法

50 名年龄在 51-85 岁之间的患者因 CLSS 接受减压而未融合,从术前到术后(术后第 1、7 和 14 天)进行随访。使用数字评分量表(NRS;0=无痛,10=最痛)评估腰背疼痛,使用 EuroQol-5D 指数(0=死亡,1=最佳)评估生活质量,使用 EQ-5D 视觉模拟量表(0=最差,100=最佳)。

结果

NRS 腿痛从术前到术后第 1 天减轻 5.2(6.1,4.3)(平均值(95%CI)),NRS 腰痛从术后第 1 天到第 7 天减轻 0.6(1.2,0.03),从术后第 7 天到第 14 天减轻 0.7(1.3,0.2)。相比之下,EQ-5D 指数从术前到术后第 1 天增加 0.09(0.06,0.13),从术后第 1 天到第 7 天增加 0.05(0.02,0.08),EQ-5D VAS 从术前到术后第 1 天增加 13.7(9.1,18.3),从术后第 1 天到第 7 天增加 6.0(2.0,10.0)。两周后,51%的患者背痛改善超过最小临床重要差异(MCID),71%的患者腿痛改善超过 MCID。

结论

因 CLSS 接受减压手术的患者应被告知,术后一天内可预期腿痛和生活质量普遍改善,术后第一周生活质量进一步改善,背痛在术后两周内改善。在大多数患者中,因 CLSS 进行的减压而不融合似乎在 2 周内达到临床相关的改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e913/10962069/d0a83be50388/13018_2024_4614_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e913/10962069/d0a83be50388/13018_2024_4614_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e913/10962069/d0a83be50388/13018_2024_4614_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Recovery pattern after decompression of central lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational cohort study.中央型腰椎管狭窄减压术后的恢复模式:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Mar 25;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04614-1.
2
Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.腰椎管狭窄症且术前存在明显背痛的患者,在未进行融合或固定的减压术后背痛得到改善。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Nov;25(5):596-601. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151468. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
3
Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.神经减压融合治疗同节段复发性腰椎狭窄症后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异:理解临床与统计学意义。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 May;16(5):471-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11842. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
4
Improvement of Back and Leg Pain after Lumbar Spinal Decompression without Fusion.非融合腰椎减压术后腰腿痛的改善
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;80(2):81-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669473. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
5
Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.测定融合延伸治疗相邻节段病变后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):61-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE1194. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
6
Education level as a prognostic indicator at 12 months following decompression surgery for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.教育水平作为症状性腰椎管狭窄减压手术后12个月时的一个预后指标。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Oct 5;30(1):60-68. doi: 10.3171/2018.6.SPINE18226. Print 2019 Jan 1.
7
Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis.经微创减压治疗后,腰椎狭窄症患者的主要腰痛得到改善。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jul 14;39(4):576-582. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23278. Print 2023 Oct 1.
8
Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients.伴有和不伴有融合的减压手术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症合并腰椎管狭窄症的疗效与术前疼痛模式的关系:一项对1624例患者的登记研究
Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):638-46. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
9
Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease.仅接受减压治疗的腰椎退行性疾病患者的最小临床重要差异。
Spine J. 2022 Apr;22(4):549-560. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.010. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
10
Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.同节段复发性腰椎管狭窄翻修神经减压融合术后的长期疗效:明确手术的有效性
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):353-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826105a5.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcomes and their associated factors at 1- and 2-year follow-up after lumbar spine surgery: a surgery registry study.腰椎手术后1年和2年随访时患者报告的结局及其相关因素:一项手术登记研究
Qual Life Res. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04049-z.
2
Cross-cultural validation of the Fukushima lumbar spinal stenosis scale in Korean patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.福岛腰椎管狭窄症量表在韩国退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者中的跨文化验证。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 12;20(1):762. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06188-y.
3
Comparison of treatment outcomes and analysis of factors interfering with efficacy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing unilateral unichannel and bichannel endoscopic ULBD surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.随访评分、变化评分或百分比变化评分用于确定手术后的临床重要结局?一项来自挪威脊柱外科登记处的观察性研究,评估了腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎退行性滑脱患者报告的结局测量指标。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2386-y.
2
The Association between the Cross-Sectional Area of the Dural Sac and Low Back Pain in a Large Population: The Wakayama Spine Study.大样本群体中硬脊膜囊横截面积与腰痛的关联:和歌山脊柱研究
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0160002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160002. eCollection 2016.
3
单侧单通道与双通道内镜下腰椎管减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的疗效比较及影响疗效因素分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 9;20(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05771-7.
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.后路腰椎滑脱症的椎板切除术联合融合术与单纯椎板切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.
4
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.随机对照试验:融合手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.
5
Poor patient-reported outcome after hip replacement, related to poor perception of perioperative information, commoner in immigrants than in non-immigrants.髋关节置换术后患者报告的结果较差,这与围手术期信息的认知不足有关,在移民中比在非移民中更为常见。
Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):218-24. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1135664. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
6
An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update).基于证据的退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症诊断和治疗临床指南(更新)。
Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):734-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059.
7
Impact of pain on function and health related quality of life in lumbar spinal stenosis. A register study of 14,821 patients.腰痛性椎管狭窄症患者的疼痛对功能和健康相关生活质量的影响:一项 14821 例患者的登记研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):E937-45. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182955989.
8
Swespine: the Swedish spine register : the 2012 report.Swespine:瑞典脊柱注册中心报告:2012 年度报告。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):953-74. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2758-9.
9
Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.全国范围内腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗趋势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):916-26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182833e7c.
10
Uncertainties in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症诊断中的不确定性。
Radiology. 2011 Dec;261(3):681-4. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111086.