Davis Mary E, Blake Catherine, O'Donoghue Gráinne
School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science Health Sciences Building University College Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Obes Sci Pract. 2024 Apr 2;10(2):e749. doi: 10.1002/osp4.749. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) have been shown to largely attenuate the negative health risks associated with obesity. To date, literature on women with obesity has focused upon the evaluation of aerobic-based exercise interventions. Hence, there is a need to evaluate resistance and combined interventions with this cohort.
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of three exercise modalities in women with obesity for improving CRF, strength, body composition and other health outcomes.
Sixty-seven women with obesity were randomly assigned to the control (CON) or one of three exercise groups (aerobic [AE], resistance [RE], COM). Exercise groups were trained x3 times/week for 12 weeks (up to 150-min/week). Feasibility outcomes included adherence, attendance, recruitment and retention rates and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were CRF (predicted VO2 max), body composition (body weight [BW], waist circumference [WC], body fat percentage [%BF], fat mass [FM] and lean mass) and strength (5RM bench press, leg dynamometry, grip strength) and self-reported measures of physical activity, mood, sleep, pain and quality of life.
Findings support the feasibility of all three exercise modalities in terms of adherence, attendance, and retention. Interventions with a resistance component (COM and RE) were associated with the greatest improvements across the broad range of health outcomes measured. Combined was the most promising for body composition outcomes including body mass index (Effect size [ES] = 0.79, = 0.04), BW (ES = 0.75, = 0.05), %BF (ES = 0.77, = 0.04), FM (ES = 0.83, = 0.03) and WC (ES = 0.90, = 0.02), physical activity (i.e., moderate physical activity [ES = 0.69, = 0.07), mood (ES = 0.83, = 0.03) and sleep (ES = 0.78, = 0.04). Resistance was most promising for CRF (ES = 1.47, = 0.002), strength (i.e., bench press [ES = 2.88, =<0.001]) and pain (i.e., pain severity [ES = 0.40, = 0.31]).
For health outcomes, these results indicate the importance of including a resistance component when prescribing exercise for women with obesity to achieve meaningful improvements.
ISRCTN13517067.
已有研究表明,心肺适能(CRF)的改善在很大程度上可减轻与肥胖相关的负面健康风险。迄今为止,关于肥胖女性的文献主要集中在对有氧锻炼干预措施的评估上。因此,有必要对这一人群的抗阻训练及联合干预措施进行评估。
本研究旨在评估三种运动方式对肥胖女性改善心肺适能、力量、身体成分及其他健康指标的可行性和有效性。
67名肥胖女性被随机分配至对照组(CON)或三个运动组之一(有氧运动组[AE]、抗阻训练组[RE]、联合运动组[COM])。运动组每周训练3次,共12周(每周最多150分钟)。可行性指标包括依从性、出勤率、招募率和留存率以及不良事件。次要指标包括心肺适能(预测的最大摄氧量)、身体成分(体重[BW]、腰围[WC]、体脂百分比[%BF]、脂肪量[FM]和去脂体重)、力量(卧推5次重复最大值、腿部测力计测试、握力)以及自我报告的身体活动、情绪、睡眠、疼痛和生活质量指标。
研究结果支持了所有三种运动方式在依从性、出勤率和留存率方面的可行性。包含抗阻训练成分的干预措施(联合运动组和抗阻训练组)在广泛的健康指标测量中带来了最大的改善。联合运动组在身体成分指标方面最具前景,包括体重指数(效应量[ES]=0.79,P=0.04)、体重(ES=0.75,P=0.05)、体脂百分比(ES=0.77,P=0.04)、脂肪量(ES=0.83,P=0.03)和腰围(ES=0.90,P=0.02),身体活动方面(即中等强度身体活动[ES=0.69,P=0.07])、情绪(ES=0.83,P=0.03)和睡眠(ES=0.78,P=0.04)。抗阻训练组在心肺适能(ES=1.47,P=0.002)、力量(即卧推[ES=2.88,P<0.001])和疼痛(即疼痛严重程度[ES=0.40,P=0.31])方面最具前景。
对于健康指标而言,这些结果表明,为肥胖女性制定运动处方时,纳入抗阻训练成分以实现有意义的改善非常重要。
ISRCTN13517067。