• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

算法伦理:为重症监护中的人工智能规划伦理路径。

Algor-ethics: charting the ethical path for AI in critical care.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Infermi Hospital, Romagna Local Health Authority, Viale Settembrini 2, Rimini, 47923, Italy.

Health Services Research, Evaluation and Policy Unit, Romagna Local Health Authority, Viale Settembrini 2, Rimini, 47923, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Aug;38(4):931-939. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01157-y. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10877-024-01157-y
PMID:38573370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11297831/
Abstract

The integration of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) based on artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is groundbreaking evolution with enormous potential, but its development and ethical implementation, presents unique challenges, particularly in critical care, where physicians often deal with life-threating conditions requiring rapid actions and patients unable to participate in the decisional process. Moreover, development of AI-based CDSS is complex and should address different sources of bias, including data acquisition, health disparities, domain shifts during clinical use, and cognitive biases in decision-making. In this scenario algor-ethics is mandatory and emphasizes the integration of 'Human-in-the-Loop' and 'Algorithmic Stewardship' principles, and the benefits of advanced data engineering. The establishment of Clinical AI Departments (CAID) is necessary to lead AI innovation in healthcare, ensuring ethical integrity and human-centered development in this rapidly evolving field.

摘要

临床决策支持系统(CDSS)与人工智能(AI)的整合是医疗保健领域具有开创性的发展,具有巨大的潜力,但它的开发和伦理实施提出了独特的挑战,特别是在重症监护中,医生经常处理危及生命的情况,需要快速行动,而患者无法参与决策过程。此外,基于人工智能的 CDSS 的开发非常复杂,应该解决不同来源的偏差,包括数据采集、健康差异、临床使用期间的领域转移以及决策中的认知偏差。在这种情况下,算法伦理学是强制性的,强调了“人机交互”和“算法监管”原则的整合,以及先进的数据工程的好处。建立临床人工智能部门(CAID)是必要的,以领导医疗保健领域的人工智能创新,确保在这个快速发展的领域中的伦理完整性和以人为中心的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45f5/11297831/835b83b6e21e/10877_2024_1157_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45f5/11297831/66bd8b7ab23f/10877_2024_1157_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45f5/11297831/835b83b6e21e/10877_2024_1157_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45f5/11297831/66bd8b7ab23f/10877_2024_1157_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45f5/11297831/835b83b6e21e/10877_2024_1157_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Algor-ethics: charting the ethical path for AI in critical care.算法伦理:为重症监护中的人工智能规划伦理路径。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Aug;38(4):931-939. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01157-y. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.临床医生在使用人工智能方面的角色和必要的理解水平:一项对德国医学生的定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01109-w.
3
Artificial Intelligence to support ethical decision-making for incapacitated patients: a survey among German anesthesiologists and internists.人工智能支持失能患者的伦理决策:德国麻醉师和内科医生的调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jul 18;25(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01079-z.
4
AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems: An Ongoing Pursuit of Potential.人工智能驱动的临床决策支持系统:对潜力的持续追求。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 6;16(4):e57728. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57728. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
The Medicine Revolution Through Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Challenges of Machine Learning Algorithms in Decision-Making.通过人工智能实现的医学革命:机器学习算法在决策中的伦理挑战
Cureus. 2024 Sep 14;16(9):e69405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69405. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Trust criteria for artificial intelligence in health: normative and epistemic considerations.人工智能在健康领域的信任标准:规范和认知考虑。
J Med Ethics. 2024 Jul 23;50(8):544-551. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109338.
7
Unraveling the Ethical Enigma: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.解开伦理谜团:医疗保健领域的人工智能
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43262. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Geriatrics: An Ethical Analysis.基于人工智能的老年病学临床决策支持系统:伦理分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Sep;24(9):1271-1276.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.06.008. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
9
[Supporting medical and nursing activities with AI: recommendations for responsible design and use].[利用人工智能支持医疗和护理活动:负责任设计与使用的建议]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Sep;67(9):1039-1046. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03918-1. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
10
A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study.具有人工智能解释的睡眠分期任务临床决策支持系统:以用户为中心的设计和评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e28659. doi: 10.2196/28659.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in dentistry: Balancing innovation with ethical responsibility.牙科领域的人工智能:平衡创新与道德责任。
Bioinformation. 2025 Mar 31;21(3):489-494. doi: 10.6026/973206300210489. eCollection 2025.
2
Expert consensus on feasibility and application of automatic pain assessment in routine clinical use.自动疼痛评估在常规临床应用中的可行性与应用专家共识
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Jun 2;5(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00249-8.
3
AI for chronic pain in children: a powerful resource.人工智能用于儿童慢性疼痛:一种强大的资源。

本文引用的文献

1
Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases.人类继承了人工智能偏差。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 3;13(1):15737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42384-8.
2
FDA-cleared artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices and their 510(k) predicate networks.FDA 批准的人工智能和基于机器学习的医疗器械及其 510(k) 前序网络。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Sep;5(9):e618-e626. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00126-7.
3
Development of real-time individualized risk prediction models for contrast associated acute kidney injury and 30-day dialysis after contrast enhanced computed tomography.
BMC Pediatr. 2025 May 30;25(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05796-1.
4
Ethical Considerations in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pain Medicine.疼痛医学中人工智能应用的伦理考量
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Jan 6;29(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01330-7.
5
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Diagnostic Processes and Comprehensive Multimodal Models in Pain Medicine.疼痛医学中人工智能驱动的诊断过程与综合多模态模型
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 16;14(9):983. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090983.
开发对比剂相关急性肾损伤和增强 CT 后 30 天透析的实时个体化风险预测模型。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Oct;167:111034. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111034. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
4
ECMO PAL: using deep neural networks for survival prediction in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.ECMO PAL:使用深度神经网络预测静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合中的生存率。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Sep;49(9):1090-1099. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07157-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
5
Are two naïve and distributed heads better than one? Factors influencing the performance of teams in a challenging real-time task.两个单纯且分散的头脑会比一个更好吗?影响团队在具有挑战性的实时任务中表现的因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 12;14:1042710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1042710. eCollection 2023.
6
Algorithmic fairness audits in intensive care medicine: artificial intelligence for all?重症医学中的算法公平性审计:人工智能面向所有人吗?
Crit Care. 2022 Oct 18;26(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04197-5.
7
Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning.通过机器学习实现医疗保健中的公平性。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2022;24(3):39. doi: 10.1007/s10676-022-09658-7. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
8
Unsupervised segmentation and quantification of COVID-19 lesions on computed Tomography scans using CycleGAN.基于 CycleGAN 的 CT 扫描 COVID-19 病变的无监督分割与定量分析。
Methods. 2022 Sep;205:200-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
9
Shifting machine learning for healthcare from development to deployment and from models to data.将医疗保健领域的机器学习从开发转移到部署,从模型转移到数据。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2022 Dec;6(12):1330-1345. doi: 10.1038/s41551-022-00898-y. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
10
Presence of comorbidities alters management and worsens outcome of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the LUNG SAFE study.合并症的存在改变了急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的治疗方式并恶化了其预后:来自LUNG SAFE研究的见解。
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 May 21;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01015-7.