• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[创伤失血性休克患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素]

[Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock].

作者信息

Si Xiaoqian, Zhao Xiujuan, Zhu Fengxue, Wang Tianbing

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

Peking University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Apr 18;56(2):307-312. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.02.016.

DOI:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.02.016
PMID:38595249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11004962/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 314 patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock at Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital from December 2012 to August 2021, including 152 male patients and 162 female patients, with a median age of 63.00 (49.75-82.00) years. The demographic data, past medical history, injury assessment, vital signs, laboratory examination and other indicators of these patients during hospitalization were recorded. These patients were divided into two groups, ARDS group (=89) and non-ARDS group (=225) according to whether there was ARDS within 7 d of admission. Risk factors for ARDS were identified using Logistic regression. The C-statistic expressed as a percentage [area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve] was used to assess the discrimination of the model.

RESULTS

The incidence of ARDS after traumatic hemorrhagic shock was 28.34%. Finally, Logistic regression model showed that the independent risk factors of ARDS after traumatic hemorrhagic shock included male, history of coronary heart disease, high acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score, road traffic accident and elevated troponin Ⅰ. The and 95% confidence intervals () were 4.01 (95%: 1.75-9.20), 5.22 (95%: 1.29-21.08), 1.07 (95%: 1.02-1.57), 2.53 (95%: 1.21-5.28), and 1.26 (95%: 1.02-1.57), respectively; the values were 0.001, 0.020, 0.009, 0.014, and 0.034, respectively. The ROC curve was used to analyze the value of each risk factor in predicting ARDS. It was found that the AUC for predicting ARDS after traumatic hemorrhagic shock was 0.59 (95%: 0.51-0.68) for male, 0.55 (95%: 0.46-0.64) for history of coronary heart disease, 0.65 (95%: 0.57-0.73) for APACHE Ⅱ score, 0.58 (95%: 0.50-0.67) for road traffic accident, and 0.73 (95%: 0.66-0.80) for elevated troponin Ⅰ, with an overall predictive value of 0.81 (95%: 0.74-0.88).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ARDS in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock is high, and male, history of coronary heart disease, high APACHE Ⅱ score, road traffic accident and elevated troponin Ⅰ are independent risk factors for ARDS after traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Timely monitoring these indicators is conducive to early detection and treatment of ARDS after traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

摘要

目的

探讨创伤失血性休克后急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的危险因素。

方法

这是一项对2012年12月至2021年8月北京大学人民医院创伤医学中心314例创伤失血性休克患者的回顾性队列研究,其中男性患者152例,女性患者162例,中位年龄为63.00(49.75 - 82.00)岁。记录这些患者住院期间的人口统计学数据、既往病史、损伤评估、生命体征、实验室检查及其他指标。根据入院7 d内是否发生ARDS将这些患者分为两组,即ARDS组(n = 89)和非ARDS组(n = 225)。采用Logistic回归分析确定ARDS的危险因素。用C统计量[以受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)表示的百分比]评估模型的判别能力。

结果

创伤失血性休克后ARDS的发生率为28.34%。最终,Logistic回归模型显示创伤失血性休克后ARDS的独立危险因素包括男性、冠心病史、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)升高、道路交通事故及肌钙蛋白Ⅰ升高。比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)分别为4.01(95%:1.75 - 9.20)、5.22(95%:1.29 - 21.08)、1.07(95%:1.02 - 1.57)、2.53(95%:1.21 - 5.28)和1.26(95%:1.02 - 1.57);P值分别为0.001、0.020、0.009、0.014和0.034。用ROC曲线分析各危险因素预测ARDS的价值。结果发现,男性预测创伤失血性休克后ARDS的AUC为0.59(95%:0.51 -

相似文献

1
[Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock].[创伤失血性休克患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Apr 18;56(2):307-312. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.02.016.
2
[An early warning model for sepsis complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome based on synthetic minority oversampling technique algorithm].基于合成少数过采样技术算法的脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征早期预警模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):358-363. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230925-00821.
3
[Analysis of risk factors of acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to severe multiple trauma].[严重多发伤继发急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):299-304. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201023-00685.
4
[Risk factors analysis of acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care unit traumatic patients].[重症监护病房创伤患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Oct;30(10):978-982. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.010.015.
5
[Establishment and verification of LIPS score combined with APACHE II score and oxygenation index to predict the occurrence model of ARDS].[建立LIPS评分联合APACHE II评分及氧合指数预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征发生模型并验证]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Oct;34(10):1048-1054. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220930-00883.
6
[A new warning scoring system establishment for prediction of sepsis in patients with trauma in intensive care unit].[一种用于预测重症监护病房创伤患者脓毒症的新预警评分系统的建立]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Apr;31(4):422-427. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.04.010.
7
[Prognostic value of microRNA-122 combined with APACHE II score in patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome].[微小RNA-122联合急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Jun;31(6):694-698. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.06.007.
8
[Establishment of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome early warning score in patients with severe trauma and its clinical significance: a multicenter study].[严重创伤患者多器官功能障碍综合征预警评分的建立及其临床意义:一项多中心研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jan;30(1):41-46. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.01.008.
9
[Dynamic measurement of volume of atelectasis area in the evaluation of the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome].[动态测量肺不张面积在中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后评估中的应用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Sep;32(9):1056-1060. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20191219-00056.
10
[Establishment of risk prediction nomograph model for sepsis related acute respiratory distress syndrome].[脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险预测列线图模型的建立]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):714-718. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230215-00088.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征。
Lancet. 2021 Aug 14;398(10300):622-637. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00439-6. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
Cardiac biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的心脏生物标志物:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Intensive Care. 2021 Apr 26;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00548-6.
3
[Analysis of risk factors of acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to severe multiple trauma].[严重多发伤继发急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):299-304. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201023-00685.
4
Is restrictive fluid resuscitation beneficial not only for hemorrhagic shock but also for septic shock?: A meta-analysis.限制液体复苏不仅对失血性休克有益,对感染性休克也有益吗?一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 26;100(12):e25143. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025143.
5
Nationwide cohort study of independent risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome after trauma.创伤后急性呼吸窘迫综合征独立危险因素的全国性队列研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Feb 15;4(1):e000249. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000249. eCollection 2019.
6
Progressive myocardial injury is associated with mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.进行性心肌损伤与急性呼吸窘迫综合征的死亡率相关。
J Crit Care. 2018 Dec;48:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
7
Mild to Moderate to Severe: What Drives the Severity of ARDS in Trauma Patients?轻度至中度再到重度:是什么导致创伤患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的严重程度?
Am Surg. 2018 Jun 1;84(6):808-812.
8
Definition and epidemiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的定义与流行病学
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jul;5(14):282. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.62.
9
Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.急性呼吸窘迫综合征:柏林定义。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.
10
Cardiac troponin I and acute lung injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage.心脏肌钙蛋白 I 与蛛网膜下腔出血后的急性肺损伤。
Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(2):177-82. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9223-y. Epub 2009 Apr 30.